Advertisement

Simulation in Plastic Surgery

  • Tanisha HutchinsonEmail author
  • Gregory Kelts
  • Peter A. Hilger
Chapter
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

The following chapter provides an overview of the several types of simulation being employed in plastic surgery education and medical practice. Modes of simulation range from inanimate two-dimensional models, to animal models, to fresh perfused human cadaver. Simulation models used in plastic surgery allow for practice of skin and soft tissue techniques, as well as detailed microsurgery. Advances over the years have allowed simulation to be useful not only in conceptual teaching but also in presurgical preparation. Simulation in plastic surgery continues to be explored as an assessment tool for medical trainees. The use of simulation in plastic surgery is still in its fairly early stages and will likely have vast implications in the future.

Keywords

Simulation Plastic surgery Facial plastic surgery Microsurgery Benchtop model Craniosynostectomy Mammoplasty Virtual surgery 3-D printing 

References

  1. 1.
    Kazan R, et al. The evolution of surgical simulation: the current state and future avenues for plastic surgery education. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):533e–43e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loukas M, et al. Anatomy in ancient India: a focus on the Susruta Samhita. J Anat. 2010;217(6):646–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Majumder S, Southern SJ, Stoker J. The microvascular simulator. (0007-1226 (Print)). Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(3):242–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senior MA, Southern SJ, Majumder S. Microvascular simulator--a device for micro-anastomosis training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(5):358–60.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vadodaria S, et al. The first cleft palate simulator. (1529-4242 (Electronic)). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(1):259–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamilton EC, et al. Improving operative performance using a laparoscopic hernia simulator. (0002-9610 (Print)). Am J Surg. 2001;182(6):725–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott DJ, et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? (1072-7515 (Print)). J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(3):272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denadai R, et al. Training on synthetic ethylene-vinyl acetate bench model allows novice medical students to acquire suture skills. (1678-2674 (Electronic)). Acta Cir Bras. 2012;27(3):271–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Denadai R, et al. Acquisition of suture skills during medical graduation by instructor-directed training: a randomized controlled study comparing senior medical students and faculty surgeons. Updat Surg. 2013;65(2):131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Denadai R, Toledo AP, Martinhão Souto LR. Basic plastic surgery skills training program on inanimate bench models during medical graduation. Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012:651863.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sillitoe AT, Platt A. The Z-plasty simulator. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004;86(4):304–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nicolaou M, et al. An inexpensive 3-D model for teaching local flap design on the face and head. (1478–7083 (Electronic)). Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(3):320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liew SH, et al. A non-animal facial model for teaching local flaps to trainees. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57(4):374–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis CR, Fell M, Khan U. Facial reconstruction using a skull and foam training model. (1878-0539 (Electronic)). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(1):126–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ross GL, et al. Manoeuvring a-head in plastic surgery. (0007-1226 (Print)). Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(8):812–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taylor SR, Chang CW. Gelatin facial skin simulator for cutaneous reconstruction. (1097-6817 (Electronic)). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(2):279–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sajan JA. et al. A 3-dimensional organosilicate validated model for facial reconstruction. 2012. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu MM, Kim J, Jabbour N. Teaching Furlow palatoplasty: the sticky note method. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(11):1849–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Podolsky DJ, et al. Evaluation and implementation of a high-fidelity Cleft Palate simulator. (1529–4242 (Electronic)). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):85e–96e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hicdonmez T, Parsak T, Cobanoglu S. Simulation of surgery for craniosynostosis: a training model in a fresh cadaveric sheep cranium. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2006;105(2):150–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coelho G, et al. Anatomical pediatric model for craniosynostosis surgical training. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(12):2009–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kazan R, et al. A novel mammoplasty part-task trainer for simulation of breast augmentation: description and evaluation. (1559-713X (Electronic)). Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):60–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zucca-Matthes G, Lebovic G, Lyra M. Mastotrainer new version: realistic simulator for training in breast surgery. (1532-3080 (Electronic)). Breast. 2017;31:82–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eggleston TA, et al. Comparison of two porcine (Sus scrofa domestica) skin models for in vivo near-infrared laser exposure. (1532-0820 (Print)). Comp Med. 2000;50(4):391–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Isaacson DS, Edmonds PR, Isaacson G. The galliform (Turkey thigh) model for resident training in facial plastic surgery. (1531-4995 (Electronic)). Laryngoscope. 2014;124(4):866–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bauer F, et al. Reconstruction of facial defects with local flaps – a training model for medical students? Head Face Med. 2015;11(1):30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Camelo-Nunes JM, Hiratsuka J, et al. Ox tongue: an alternative model for surgical training. (1529–4242 (Electronic)). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(1):352–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hassan Z, Hogg F, Graham K. A 3-dimensional model for teaching local flaps using porcine skin. (1536-3708 (Electronic)). Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(4):362–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wanzel KR, et al. Teaching technical skills: training on a simple, inexpensive, and portable model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Denadai R, Oshiiwa M, Saad-Hossne R. Does bench model fidelity interfere in the acquisition of suture skills by novice medical students? (1806–9282 (Electronic)). Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2012;58(5):600–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Denadai R, Oshiiwa M, Saad-Hossne R. Teaching elliptical excision skills to novice medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing low- and high-Fidelity bench models. Indian J Dermatol. 2014;59(2):169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Denadai R, Saad-Hossne R, Raposo-Amaral CE. Simulation-based rhomboid flap skills training during medical education: comparing low- and high-fidelity bench models. (1536-3732 (Electronic)). J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(6):2134–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Al-Bustani S, Halvorson EG. Status of microsurgical simulation training in plastic surgery: a survey of United States program directors. (1536-3708 (Electronic)). Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(6):713–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ghanem AM, et al. A systematic review of evidence for education and training interventions in microsurgery. (2234-6163 (Print)). Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40(4):312–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Uson J, Calles MC. Design of a new suture practice card for microsurgical training. (0738-1085 (Print)). Microsurgery. 2002;22(8):324–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lannon DA, Atkins JA, Butler PE. Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training. (0738-1085 (Print)). Microsurgery. 2001;21(8):389–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ilie VG, et al. Training of microsurgical skills on nonliving models. (1098-2752 (Electronic)). Microsurgery. 2008;28(7):571–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chan WY, Matteucci SJ, Southern SJ. Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: a review. (0738-1085 (Print)). Microsurgery. 2007;27(5):494–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leclère FMP, et al. Is there good simulation basic training for end-to-side vascular microanastomoses? Aesthet Plast Surg. 2013;37(2):454–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Di Cataldo A, et al. Experimental models in microsurgery. (0738-1085 (Print)). Microsurgery. 1998;18(8):454–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Carey JN, et al. Simulation of plastic surgery and microvascular procedures using perfused fresh human cadavers. (1878-0539 (Electronic)). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(2):e42–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grober ED, et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. (0003-4932 (Print)). Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    de Sena DP, et al. Computer-assisted teaching of skin flap surgery: validation of a mobile platform software for medical students. (1932-6203 (Electronic)). PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e65833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Diaz-Siso JR, et al. Computer simulation and digital resources for plastic surgery psychomotor education. (1529-4242 (Electronic)). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):730e–8e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pfaff MJ, Steinbacher DM. Plastic surgery resident understanding and education using virtual surgical planning. (1529-4242 (Electronic)). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(1):258e–9e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    VanKoevering KK, Hollister SJ, Green GE. Advances in 3-dimensional printing in otolaryngology: a review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(2):178–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bauermeister AJ, Zuriarrain MI, Newman MI. Three-dimensional printing in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review. (1536-3708 (Electronic)). Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(5):569–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanisha Hutchinson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gregory Kelts
    • 2
  • Peter A. Hilger
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Minnesota Medical CenterMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of Minnesota Hospital and Clinics, Phillips-Wangensteen BuildingMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Division of Facial Plastic SurgeryDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota Fairview HospitalMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations