Advertisement

Bulking Agents for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence

  • Michele Pennisi
  • Antonio Luigi Pastore
  • Filippo La Torre
Chapter
  • 10 Downloads
Part of the Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions book series (UNPFD)

Abstract

Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is most commonly a consequence of prostatic surgery except when symptoms are driven by a neurological concomitant condition. Hence, compared to what urologists know about current clinical practice in female SUI, the diagnostic phase in men is a very particular and important step in the management of the disease, with accurate evaluation of the clinical context, SUI cause, quality of life assessment, and patient complaints [1, 2]. Improvements in urinary leakage after prostatic surgery (RP and TURP) may occur spontaneously or with conservative measures within the first 12 months after surgery. However, management of persistent incontinence is often challenging and may be frustrating for both a patient and his doctor, and as a consequence, it can negatively affect patients’ quality of life and doctor–patient relationship [3]. Urinary incontinence causes problems, such as poor hygiene and loss of self-confidence that directly affect the quality of life of patients. The mechanism for male SUI after prostate surgery appears to be internal sphincter deficiency. The probable mechanism for internal sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery includes rhabdo-sphincter injury during apical dissection, large and deep sutures during vesico-urethral anastomosis, or injury of the neurovascular bundles [3].

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank, DIEGO COLETTA, NORMA DEPALMA and ILARIA CLEMENTI for contributing to the realization of this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, et al. EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012a;62:1130–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, et al. EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012b;62:1118–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crivellaro S, Morlacco A, Bodo G, Agro’ EF, Gozzi C, Pistolesi D, Del Popolo G, Ficarra V. Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(8):875–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta S, Peterson AC. Stress urinary incontinence in the prostate cancer survivor. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(4):395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hubner W, et al. Contemporary management of post prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011;59:985–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Appell RA. Collagen injection therapy for urinary incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21:177–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stenberg A, Larsson E, Lindholm A, Ronneus B, Stenberg A, Läckgren G. Injectable dextranomer-based implant: histopathology, volume changes and DNA analysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999;33:355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malizia AA Jr, Reiman HM, Myers RP, et al. Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon). JAMA. 1984;251:3277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Onur R, Singla A. Comparison of bone-anchored male sling and collagen implant for the treatment of male incontinence. Int J Urol. 2006;13:1207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McGuire EJ. Urethral bulking agents. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006;3:234–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poon SA, Silberstein JL, Savage C, et al. Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists. J Urol. 2012;188:205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim PH, Pinheiro LC, Atoria CL, et al. Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2013;189:602–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith D, Appell R, Rackley R, et al. Collagen injection therapy for post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 1998;160:364–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Westney O, Bevan-Thomas R, Palmer J, et al. Transurethral collagen injections for male intrinsic sphincter deficiency: the University of Texas-Houston experience. J Urol. 2005;174:994–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shafik A. Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence. Int Surg. 1993;78:159–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Altomare DF, La Torre F, Rinaldi M, Binda G, Pescatori M. Carbon-coated microbeads anal injection in outpatient treatment of minor fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;5:432–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hussain ZI, Lim M, Stojkovic SG. Systematic review of perianal implants in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1526–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    La Torre F, de la Portilla F. Long-term efficacy of dextranomer in stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA/dx) for treatment of faecal incontinence. Color Dis. 2013;15:569–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ratto C, Parello A, Dionisi L, et al. Novel bulking agent for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1644–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Kerrebroeck P, ter Meulen F, Farrelly E, et al. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence: recent developments in the role of urethral injection. Urol Res. 2003;30:356–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pycha A, Klinger CH, Haitel A, et al. Implantable microballoons: an attractive alternative in the management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol. 1998;33:469–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menard S, Porta GD. Incidence, growth and antigenicity of fibrosarcomas induced by Teflon disc in mice. Tumori. 1976;62:565–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Witherspoon P, Bryson G, Wright DM, et al. Carcinogenic potential of commonly used hernia repair prostheses in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2004;91:368–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tjandra J, Tan JJ, Lim F, Murray-Green C. Long-term results of injectable silicone biomaterial for passive fecal incontinence – a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:730–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Pennisi
    • 1
  • Antonio Luigi Pastore
    • 2
  • Filippo La Torre
    • 3
  1. 1.Urology DepartmentCannizzaro HospitalCataniaItaly
  2. 2.Department Medico-Surgical Sciences and BiotechnologiesSapienza University of RomeLatinaItaly
  3. 3.Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery Unit Emergency Department“Sapienza” Rome UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations