Advertisement

Urinary and Fecal Incontinence: Preoperative Considerations

  • Michele Pennisi
  • Alvise FrassonEmail author
Chapter
  • 10 Downloads
Part of the Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions book series (UNPFD)

Abstract

Male urinary incontinence (UI) is a multifactorial disease. Details of the type of UI as severity and voiding symptoms usually allow to define whether the patients are affected by stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Furthermore, patients with associated pain, hematuria, recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or with a history of prostate surgery or radiotherapy or suspected neurological disease need rapid referral to an appropriate specialist. In this way the patient should also be asked about medications and other diseases that may impact on symptoms of UI and medical history should be collected with the help of a voiding diary recording as follows:
  • the amount of liquid he drinks

  • frequency of micturition

  • micturition volume

  • frequency and amount of the leaks

  • whether he felt a strong urge to go before leaking

  • whether the leak occurred after a strain, or, coughing or sneeze

  • how long the symptoms have been occurring

References

  1. 1.
    Muñoz-Yagüe T, Solís-Muñoz P, Ciriza de los Ríos C, Muñoz-Garrido F, Vara J, Solís-Herruzo JA. Fecal incontinence in men: causes and clinical and manometric features. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(24):7933–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown SR, Wadhawan H, Nelson RL. Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD001757.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub4.
  3. 3.
    Mazor Y, Jones M, Andrews A, Kellow JE, Malcolm A. Novel insights into fecal incontinence in men. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;312(1):G46–51.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00362.2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mundet L, Ribas Y, Arco S, Clavé P. Quality of life differences in female and male patients with fecal incontinence. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(1):94–101.  https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm15088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg. 2008;247:224–37.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318142cdf4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lazarescu A, Turnbull GK, Vanner S. Investigating and treating fecal incontinence: when and how. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23(4):301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, 5–8 July 2008. Portsmouth: Health Publications Ltd; 2009.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang JY, Abbas MA. Current management of fecal incontinence. Perm J. 2013;17(3):65–73.  https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/12-064.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Medical Systems. Fecal incontinence scoring system. Minnetonka: American Medical Systems; 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ratto C, Doglietto GB, editors. Fecal incontinence diagnosis and treatment. Berlin: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Cottenden A, Davila W, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Drake M, Dubeau C, Fry C, Hanno P, Smith JH, Herschorn S, Hosker G, Kelleher C, Koelbl H, Khoury S, Madoff R, Milsom I, Moore K, Newman D, Nitti V, Norton C, Nygaard I, Payne C, Smith A, Staskin D, Tekgul S, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek D, Wein A, Wyndaele JJ, Members of Committees; Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:213–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee JT, Madoff RD, Rockwood TH. Quality-of-life measures in fecal incontinence: is validation valid? Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(3):352–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000290.
  14. 14.
    Santoro G, Wieczorek AP, Bartram CI, editors. Pelvic floor disorders, imaging and multidisciplinary approach to management. Berlin: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yeap ZH, Simillis C, Qiu S, Ramage L, Kontovounisios C, Tekkis P. Diagnostic accuracy of anorectal manometry for fecal incontinence: a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2017;117(6):347–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2017.1394674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cavallari F, Dodi G. Test della sfera solida: validazione metodologica e dati preliminari nella stipsi da anismo. PelviPerineologia. 2004;23:132–5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guerette N, Neimark M, Kopka SL, Jones JE, Davila GW. Initial experience with a new method for the dynamic assessment of pelvic floor function in women: the Kolpexin Pull Test. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15:39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE. Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:232–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Burkhard FC, Bosch JLHR, Cruz F, Lemack GE, Nambiar AK, Thiruchelvam N, Tubaro A. Guidelines associates: Ambühl D, Bedretdinova DA, Farag F, Lombardo R, Schneider MP. Non Oncology EAU Guidelines 2017.Google Scholar
  2. Cameron AP, Suskind AM, Neer C, Hussain H, Montgomery J, Latini JM, DeLancey JO. Functional and anatomical differences between continent and incontinent men post radical prostatectomy on urodynamics and 3T MRI: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(6):527–32.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung E, Katz DJ. Christopher Adult male stress and urge urinary incontinence – a review of pathophysiology and treatment strategies for voiding dysfunction in men. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46(9):661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dorflinger A, et al. Urethral pressure profile: is it affected by position? Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gravas S, et al. EAU Guidelines on the management of Non-Neurogenic Male LUTS. In: EAU Guidelines. Edn. published at the 33rd EAU Annual Congress, Copenhagen, E.G. Office, editor. The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office Arnhem; 2018.Google Scholar
  6. Hess R, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of questionnaire-based initiation of urgency urinary incontinence treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:244 e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huckabay C, Twiss C, Berger A, Nitti VW. A urodynamics protocol to optimally assess men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):622–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khandelwal C, Kistler C. Diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(8):543–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Krhut J, et al. Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nguyen L, et al. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2008;179:1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ouslander JG, et al. Use of a portable ultrasound device to measure post-void residual volume among incontinent nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paparel P, et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2009;55:629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Suskind AM, DeLancey JO, Hussain HK, Montgomery JS, Latini JM, Cameron AP. Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post-radical prostatectomy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(3):312–5.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Thiel DD, Young PR, Broderick GA, Heckman MG, Wehle MJ, Igel TC, Petrou SP. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence? Urology. 2007;69(2):315–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thiel DD, et al. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence? Urology. 2007;69:315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tran MG, et al. Patient reported outcome measures in male incontinence surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tse V, King J, Dowling C, et al. Conjoint Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) and Urogynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Guidelines on the management of adult non-neurogenic overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2016;117(1):34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Brummen HJ, et al. The association between overactive bladder symptoms and objective parameters from bladder diary and filling cystometry. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Leijsen SA, et al. Value of urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urology DepartmentCannizzaro HospitalCataniaItaly
  2. 2.USL 6 Euganea, Unit of SurgerySant’Antonio HospitalPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations