Advertisement

Heart Failure pp 255-259 | Cite as

Acute Rejection

  • Michelle M. Kittleson
  • Jon A. KobashigawaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cardiovascular Medicine book series (CVM)

Abstract

Rejection in heart transplant recipients is diagnosed via the endomyocardial biopsy. The management of rejection proceeds in a stepwise fashion based on the severity of rejection detected on biopsy and the patient’s presentation, from asymptomatic to hemodynamic compromise with cardiogenic shock. While cellular rejection is often successfully treated with corticosteroids and cytolytic therapy, resulting in a resolution of heart failure and normalization of the ejection fraction, management of antibody-mediated rejection is often more complicated. Patients may have a persistent reduction in ejection fraction, restrictive physiology with recurrent heart failure, and accelerated progression of transplant coronary artery disease requiring ongoing therapy directed against antibody production and function.

Keywords

Immunosuppression Antibody-mediated rejection Acute cellular rejection 

References

  1. 1.
    Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: thirty-second official adult heart transplantation report-2015; focus theme: early graft failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:1244–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kemnitz J, Cremer J, Restrepo-Specht I, et al. Hyperacute rejection in heart allografts. Case studies. Pathol Res Pract. 1991;187:23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sethi GK, Kosaraju S, Arabia FA, et al. Is it necessary to perform surveillance endomyocardial biopsies in heart transplant recipients? J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995;14:1047.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bestetti R, Theodoropoulos TA, Burdmann EA, et al. Switch from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus-induced renal recovery in heart transplant recipients in the midterm follow-up. Transplantation. 2006;81:692–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stehlik J, Starling RC, Movsesian MA, et al. Utility of long-term surveillance endomyocardial biopsy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:1402–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Billingham ME, Cary NR, Hammond ME, et al. A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: heart rejection study group. The international society for heart transplantation. J Heart Transplant. 1990;9:587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stewart S, Winters GL, Fishbein MC, et al. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:1710–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kobashigawa J, Crespo-Leiro MG, Ensminger SM, et al. Report from a consensus conference on antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:252–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berry GJ, Angelini A, Burke MM, et al. The ishlt working formulation for pathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation: evolution and current status (2005–2011). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:601–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zeevi A, Lunz J, Feingold B, et al. Persistent strong anti-hla antibody at high titer is complement binding and associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, Vernerey D, et al. Complement-binding anti-hla antibodies and kidney-allograft survival. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deng MC, Eisen HJ, Mehra MR, et al. Noninvasive discrimination of rejection in cardiac allograft recipients using gene expression profiling. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:150–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pham MX, Teuteberg JJ, Kfoury AG, et al. Gene-expression profiling for rejection surveillance after cardiac transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1890–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kobashigawa J, Patel J, Azarbal B, et al. Randomized pilot trial of gene expression profiling versus heart biopsy in the first year after heart transplant: early invasive monitoring attenuation through gene expression trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:557–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kobashigawa JA, Patel J, Furukawa H, et al. Five-year results of a randomized, single-center study of tacrolimus vs microemulsion cyclosporine in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:434–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eisen HJ, Kobashigawa J, Starling RC, et al. Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplantation: a randomized, multicenter trial. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keogh A, Richardson M, Ruygrok P, et al. Sirolimus in de novo heart transplant recipients reduces acute rejection and prevents coronary artery disease at 2 years: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2004;110:2694–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobashigawa JA, Stevenson LW, Moriguchi JD, et al. Is intravenous glucocorticoid therapy better than an oral regimen for asymptomatic cardiac rejection? A randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1142–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu GW, Kobashigawa JA, Fishbein MC, et al. Asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplantation predicts poor outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kfoury AG, Hammond ME, Snow GL, et al. Cardiovascular mortality among heart transplant recipients with asymptomatic antibody-mediated or stable mixed cellular and antibody-mediated rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:781–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kfoury AG, Stehlik J, Renlund DG, et al. Impact of repetitive episodes of antibody-mediated or cellular rejection on cardiovascular mortality in cardiac transplant recipients: defining rejection patterns. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:1277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arbustini E, Roberts WC. Morphological observations in the epicardial coronary arteries and their surroundings late after cardiac transplantation (allograft vascular disease). Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:814–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fishbein MC, Kobashigawa J. Biopsy-negative cardiac transplant rejection: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004;19:166–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kittleson MM, Patel JK, Moriguchi JD, et al. Heart transplant recipients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: outcomes from a single-center experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:1250–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Michaels PJ, Espejo ML, Kobashigawa J, et al. Humoral rejection in cardiac transplantation: risk factors, hemodynamic consequences and relationship to transplant coronary artery disease. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22:58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Patel J, Everly M, Chang D, et al. Reduction of alloantibodies via proteosome inhibition in cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:1320–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirklin JK, Brown RN, Huang ST, et al. Rejection with hemodynamic compromise: objective evidence for efficacy of photopheresis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:283–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kittleson MM, Kobashigawa JA. Long-term care of the heart transplant recipient. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014;19:515–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart InstituteLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations