Advertisement

The Portuguese Constitutional Court and Its Austerity Case Law

  • Teresa Violante
Chapter

Abstract

The Portuguese Constitutional Court (CC) played a pivotal role during the financial crisis that hit Portugal hard after 2008, especially during an international bailout that prevented the country’s bankruptcy. The strict conditionality imposed by the Memorandum of Understanding commanded national policies aimed at a sharp expenditure reduction that were brought under constitutional review by both political and legal litigants. The invalidation of some of these policies and the fiscal gap created by the rulings took by surprise not only the executive and the legislature but also the international institutions involved in the financial assistance programme. In this chapter I address the role of the CC during the financial crisis. I claim that the Government should have taken seriously the risk posed by the Constitution and its judicial interpretation to the financial assistance program. I also address the Court’s action in a comparative perspective. I conclude that the Court’s bold case law may present not only a future risk to the institution but also a shield of protection against temptations to restrict its scope of action.

References

  1. Almeida Ribeiro, G. d., & Pereira Coutinho, L. (Eds.) (2014). O Tribunal Constitucional e a Crise: Ensaios Críticos. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
  2. Amaral, M. L. (2012). Competências complementares do Tribunal Constitucional português. In Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho (Vol. II, pp. 43–55). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar
  3. Araújo, A., and Magalhães, P. (2000). A justiça constitucional: uma instituição contra as maiorias? Análise Social XXXV(154–155), 207–246.Google Scholar
  4. Balodis, R., and Pleps, J. (2013). Financial Crisis and the Constitution in Latvia. In X. Contiades (Ed.), Constitutions in the Global Financial Crisis. A Comparative Analysis. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Blanco de Morais, C. (2014). Curso de Direito Constitucional—Teoria da Constituição em tempo de crise do Estado social. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar
  6. Canotilho, M. (2018). Constitutional Law and Crisis: The Portuguese Constitutional Court under pressure? In Z. Szente & F. Gárdos-Orosz (Eds.). New Challenges to Constitutional Adjudication in Europe—A Comparative Perspective (pp. 144–163). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Canotilho, M., Violante, T., & Lanceiro, R. (2015). Austerity Measures Under Judicial Scrutiny: The Portuguese Constitutional Case Law. European Constitutional Law Review, 11, 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cappelletti, M. (1980). The Mighty Problem of Judicial Review and the Contribution of Comparative Analysis. Southern California Law Review 53, 409–445.Google Scholar
  9. Cisotta, R. and Gallo, D. (2014). The Portuguese Constitutional Court Case Law on Austerity Measures: A Reappraisal. In C. Kilpatrick & B. de Witte (Eds.), Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges (EUI Working Papers, 2014/05). At http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/31247.
  10. Contiades, X. (Ed.). (2013). Constitutions in the Global Financial Crisis. A Comparative Analysis. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. Contiades, X., & Tassopoulos, I. A. (2013). The Impact of the Financial Crisis on the Greek Constitution. In X. Contiades (Ed.), Constitutions in the Global Financial Crisis. A Comparative Analysis. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Coroado, S., Garoupa, N., & Magalhães, P. (2017). Judicial Behavior Under Austerity. An Empirical Analysis of Behavioral Changes in the Portuguese Constitutional Court, 2002–2016. Journal of Law and Courts, Fall, 2017, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabbrini, F. (2014). The Euro-Crisis and the Courts: Judicial Review and the Political Process in Comparative Perspective. Berkeley Jounral of International Law Publicist (online) 32(1), 101–160.Google Scholar
  14. Faraguna, P. (2016). The Economic Crisis as a Threat to the Stability of Law. Recent Developments in the Case Law of the Italian Constitutional Court. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 8, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galvão Teles, M. (1971). A concentração da competência para o conhecimento jurisdicional da inconstitucionalidade das leis. O Direito, ano 103, 173–210.Google Scholar
  16. Hinarejos, A. (2015). The Euro Area Crisis in Constitutional Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilpatrick, C. (2017). Constitutions, Social Rights and Sovereign Debt States in Europe: A Challenging New Area of Constitutional Inquiry. In T. Beukers (Ed.), Constitutional Change Through Euro-Crisis Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Maduro, M. P., & Frada, A., & Pierdominici, L. (2017, May). A Crisis Between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context. E-pública Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público, 4(1), 5–42.Google Scholar
  19. Nogueira de Brito, M. (2014). Putting Social Rights in Brackets? The Portuguese Experience with Welfare Challenges in Times of Crisis. In C. Kilpatrick and B. de Witte (Eds.), Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges (EUI Working Papers). At http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/31247.
  20. Novais, J. R. (2014). Em Defesa do Tribunal Constitucional: Resposta aos Críticos. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
  21. Santos, A. C. (2011). Papel político do Tribunal Constitucional. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar
  22. Scheppele, K. L. (2004). A Realpolitic Defense of Social Rights. Texas Law Review, 82, 1921–1961.Google Scholar
  23. Shapiro, M. (1998). The European Court of Justice: Of Institutions and Democracy. Israel Law Review, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stone Sweet, A. (1999). Judicialization and the Construction of Governance. Comparative Political Science, 31, 147–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Szente, Z. (2013). Breaking and Making Constitutional Rules: The Constitutional Effects of the Financial Crisis in Hungary. In X. Contiades (Ed.), Constitutions in the Global Financial Crisis. A Comparative Analysis. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. Szente, Z., & Gárdos-Orosz, F. (2018). Introduction: Contemporary Challenges of Constitutional Adjudication in Europe, in idem. New Challenges to Constitutional Adjudication in Europe—A Comparative Perspective (pp. 5–15). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players—How Political Institutions Work. New York: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tuori, K., & Tuori, K. (2014). The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Vlachogianis, A. (2018). From Submission to Reaction: The Greek Courts’ Stance on the Financial Crisis. In Z. Szente & F. Gárdos-Orosz (Eds.), New Challenges to Constitutional Adjudication in Europe—A Comparative Perspective (pp. 72–88). London: Routledge. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Violante
    • 1
  1. 1.Goethe-Universität FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations