Advertisement

The Portuguese Party System: Evolution in Continuity?

  • Carlos Jalali
Chapter

Abstract

The ‘third wave of democratization’ generated renewed interest in party systems. As the first of these ‘third wave’ democracies, Portugal represents an interesting yet relatively understudied case, contributing to the study of how party systems develop over time in more recent democracies. As this chapter highlights, the Portuguese party system became institutionalised quickly after democratisation, despite the absence of mass parties or of a pre-existing party system that was restored with democratisation. Likewise, it has remained remarkably stable over time, be it in terms of the main parties of the party system, be it in terms of the main patterns of interaction. This stability has largely endured even with the bailout that Portugal underwent from 2011 to 2014. Unlike other bailout countries—and, indeed, many Western European party systems—the Portuguese party system has not seen major electoral earthquakes and realignments. However, the post-bailout period has seen a change in interparty interactions, with an unprecedented level of cooperation between the parties of the left that has been dubbed the “contraption”. The chapter examines the potential implications of this cooperation for the party system, and explores some of the systemic factors that helped bring it about.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation FCT), by the Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (COMPETE 2020) and by the Programa Operacional Regional de Lisboa (PO Lisboa), in its European Community Fund FEDER component, as part of the ‘Changing European Elections’ project (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016887; PTDC/IVC-CPO/3481/2014).

I am grateful to João Moniz for assistance in collecting data for this chapter.

References

  1. Aguiar, J. (1996). A história múltipla. Análise Social, XXXI(139), 1235–1281.Google Scholar
  2. Avillez, M. (1996). Soares: Democracia. Lisbon: Público.Google Scholar
  3. Bértoa, F. C. & Enyedi, Z. (2014). Party System Closure and Openness Conceptualization, Operationalization and Validation. Party Politics, Epub ahead of print 9 September 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruneau, T. (1997). Introduction. In T. Bruneau (org.), Political Parties and Democracy in Portugal (pp. 1–22). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  5. Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Londres: Methuen Press.Google Scholar
  6. Frain, M. (1998). PPD/PSD e a Consolidação do Regime Democrático. Lisbon: Notícias Editorial.Google Scholar
  7. Freire, A. (2009). Mudança do sistema partidário em Portugal, 1974–2009: o papel dos factores políticos, sociais e ideológicos. In M. A. Cruz (org.), Eleições e sistemas eleitorais: perspectivas históricas e políticas (pp. 215–261). Porto: Universidade do Porto Editorial.Google Scholar
  8. Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldey, D. (1992). The Portuguese Elections of 1987 and 1991 and Presidential Elections of 1991. Electoral Studies, 11(2), 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jalali, C. (2007). Partidos e Democracia em Portugal, 1974–2005: da Revolução ao Bipartidarismo? Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  12. Jalali, C., & Lobo, M. C. (2006). The Trials of a Socialist Government: Right-Wing Victories in Local and Presidential Elections in Portugal, 2005–2006. South European Society & Politics, 2(11), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khan, M. (2015). Portugal’s ‘Berlin Wall Moment’: Communists and Anti-Euro Leftists Set to Enter Government. The Telegraph (online). Accessed 28 May 2018. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11944954/Communists-and-Leftists-set-to-enter-Portuguese-government-hailing-Berlin-wall-moment.html.
  14. Lehmann, P, Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., & Werner, A. (2015). Manifesto Corpus. Version MPDS2015a. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.Google Scholar
  15. Lobo, M. C. (2000). Governos partidários numa democracia recente: Portugal, 1976–1995. Análise Social, XXXV(154–5), 147–174.Google Scholar
  16. Mainwaring, S. (1999). Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. R. (1995). Introduction. In S. Mainwaring & T. Scully (Orgs.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America (pp. 1–34). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006). Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Orgs.), Handbook of Political Parties (pp. 204–227). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Mainwaring, S., & Zoco, E. (2007). Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies. Party politics, 13(2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mair, P. (1990). Introduction. In P. Mair (org.), The West European Party System (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mair, P. (1997). Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Morlino, L. (1995). Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe. In R. Gunther, H.-J. Puhle, & P. N. Diamandouros (Orgs.), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective (pp. 315–388). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Morlino, L. (1998). Democracy Between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups and Citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sartori, G. (1968). Political Development and Political Engineering. Public Policy, XVII, 261–298.Google Scholar
  25. Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems—A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. TVI24. (2015). Isto não é bem um Governo, é uma geringonça. Accessed 28 May 2018. http://www.tvi24.iol.pt/videos/politica/isto-nao-e-bem-um-governo-e-uma-geringonca/5641ea120cf243cfb2f11b46.
  27. von Beyme, K. (1985). Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ware, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DCSPT & GOVCOPPUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations