Advertisement

The Issue of Deploying Technology

  • Girish Gujar
  • Adolf K. Y. Ng
  • Zaili Yang
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Maritime Economics book series (PSME)

Abstract

This chapter considers maritime security as it appears at headquarters, considering how container security relates to the national security calculus, and how it is (not) pursued by the responsible state agencies in different national contexts with an emphasis on how to methodologically deploy technology to reduce associated risks. In this context, it proposes the CRAVE (costs, risks, and values evaluation) framework for GTD decisions, including supply chain security. It discusses the role of technology in container security and illustrates the characteristics of container security strategic decisions. Also, it explains the CRAVE framework, including how it can be used to make good decisions in container security.

Keywords

CRAVE framework Technology Security decisions 

References

  1. Bernhard, C. (2009). Public private dialogue in security research. Directorate General Internal Policies of the Union, Policy Department C.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess, J. P. (2008). Security as Ethics. Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  4. Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Eriksson, J. (2001). Threat Politics: New Perspectives on Security, Risk and Crisis Management. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Henisz, W. J., Mansfield, E. D., & von Glinow, M. A. (2010). Conflict, security and political risk: International business in changing times. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holmes, C. (2012). Supply chains at an inflexion point—Will the use of new technologies offset increasing costs in the Asia Pacific region? Supply Chain Council.Google Scholar
  8. Joglekar, P., & Toraskar, K. (1994, January). Costs, risks and values evaluation: A methodology for global technology deployment decisions. In Proceedings of the Goldring Institute Symposium on Global Technology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  9. Kaplan, R. (1986). Must CIM is justified by faith alone? Harvard Business Review, 64(2), 87–95.Google Scholar
  10. Mansfield, E. D., & Pollins, B. M. (2003). Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCormack, K., Wilkerson, T., Marrow, D., Davey, M., Shah, M., & Yee, D. (2008). Managing risk in your organization with the SCOR methodology. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.668.3730&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  12. McFarland, R. G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Payan, J. M. (2008). Supply chain contagion. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Naslund, D., & Williamson, S. (2010). What is management in supply chain management? A critical review of definitions, frameworks and terminology. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 11(4), 231–252.Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (2004). Container Transport Security across Modes. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. Rothenberg, J. (1975). Cost-benefit analysis: A methodological exposition. In H. Guttentag & E. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of Evaluation Research (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Stein, A. A. (1993). Governments, economic interdependence, and international cooperation. In P. E. Tetlock, J. L. Husbands, R. Jervis, P. C. Stern, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Behaviour, Society and Nuclear War (pp. 241–324). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Thai, V. (2009). Effective maritime security: Conceptual model and empirical evidence. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vanany, I., Zailani, S., & Pujawan, N. (2009). Supply chain risk management: Literature review and future research. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van der Linden, J. A. (2001). The economic impact study of maritime policy issues: Application to the German case. Maritime Policy & Management, 28(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Girish Gujar
    • 1
  • Adolf K. Y. Ng
    • 2
  • Zaili Yang
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Business and ManagementBeijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International CollegeZhuhaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Supply Chain ManagementAsper School of Business St. John’s College University of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  3. 3.Department of Maritime & Mechanical EngineeringLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations