Advertisement

The Duty of Personal Diligence and Integrity

  • Katia Fach Gómez
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter aims to define the contours of the duty of personal diligence and integrity. This duty is highly complex, and this chapter deals with three different facets of this duty individually: non-delegation of responsibilities; time-related availability, and appropriate behaviour. Each section of this chapter examines the way in which these concepts have been shaped, in both commercial arbitration and in other contexts, such as the judicial, when necessary. The final aim is to put forward practical ideas on the specific content that should be attributed to these notions in the investment arbitration environment. It is also argued that these issues will need to be defined more clearly in the future, in contexts such as ICSID, the ICS, and a possible MIC.

References

  1. Altenkirch M, Schmeil B (2015) The Substantial involvement of arbitral secretaries. Global Arbitration News. https://globalarbitrationnews.com/the-substantial-involvement-of-arbitral-secretaries-20150917/
  2. Andersson S (2015) A Fourth Arbitrator or an Administrative Secretary? A Study on the Appointment and Authority of Arbitral Secretaries in Swedish Arbitral Proceedings. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:817193/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  3. Baker McKenzie (2017) Submissions to the ICSID Secretariat on amendments to the ICSID Rules and Regulations. https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/about/Public%20Comments%20to%20Amendment%20to%20ICSID%20Rules%20and%20Regulations.pdf
  4. Benson L (2016) HKIAC pioneers accreditation of tribunal secretaries. https://afiaasiablog.wordpress.com/2016/04/19/hkiac-pioneers-accreditation-of-tribunal-secretaries/
  5. Berger KP (2015) 27 Scenario: deliberation of the tribunal and rendering of the award. In: Berger KP (ed) Private dispute resolution in international business. Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, 3rd rev edn. Wolter Kluwers, Alphen ann den Rijn, pp 1–38Google Scholar
  6. Berwin, Leighton, Paisner (2015) Research based report on the use of tribunal secretaries in international commercial arbitration. http://www.blplaw.com/media/International_Arbitration/BLP_International_Arbitration_Survey_2015.pdf
  7. Bobek M (2014) The Court of Justice of the European Union, Research Papers in Law. College of Europe. https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/.../researchpaper_2_2014_bobek.pdf
  8. Brauch MB (2014) Yukos v. Russia: The issues and legal reasoning behind US$50 billion awards. Investment Treaty News. https://www.iisd.org/itn/2014/09/04/yukos-v-russia-issues-and-legal-reasoning-behind-us50-billion-awards/
  9. Brower CN, Melikian S, Daly MP (2015) Tall and small tales of a challenged arbitrator. In: Giorgetti C (ed) Challenges and Recusals of Judges and arbitrators in international courts and tribunals. Brill, Leiden Boston, pp 320–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daele K (2012) Challenge and disqualification of arbitrators in international arbitration. Kluwer, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. EFILA (2017) Response of the European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration to the Invitation to File Suggestions for ICSID Rules Amendments. https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/about/Public%20Comments%20to%20Amendment%20to%20ICSID%20Rules%20and%20Regulations.pdf
  12. Egger PW (2010) Independence, impartiality and disclosure in international arbitration: recent developments. Yearb Int Arbitr 1:103–113Google Scholar
  13. Freshfields, Bruckhaus, Deringer LLP (2017) Proposals from the International Arbitration Group. https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/about/Public%20Comments%20to%20Amendment%20to%20ICSID%20Rules%20and%20Regulations.pdf
  14. Galagan D, Živković P (2015) The Challenge of the Yukos Award: an Award Written by Someone Else – a Violation of the Tribunal’s Mandate? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/02/27/the-challenge-of-the-yukos-award-an-award-written-by-someone-else-a-violation-of-the-tribunals-mandate/
  15. Hanotiau B (2003) Misdeeds, wrongful conduct and illegality in arbitral proceedings. In: Van den Berg AJ (ed) International commercial arbitration: important contemporary questions. Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London/New York, pp 261–287Google Scholar
  16. Hong-Lin Y, Masood A (2016) Keeping the invisible hand under control? Arbitrator’s mandate and assisting third parties. Vindobona J Int Commer Law Arbitr 19(2):1–38Google Scholar
  17. Howse R (2015) Courting the Critics of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: the EU proposal for a judicial system for investment disputes. https://cdn-media.web-view.net/i/fjj3t288ah/Courting_the_Criticsdraft1.pdf
  18. Howse R (2017) The Fourth Man: an intriguing sub-plot in the Yukos arbitration. ISDS Platform. http://isds.bilaterals.org/?the-fourth-man-an-intriguing-sub
  19. Hutcheon P (2012) High-profile QC kicked out of disputes body. The Herald. http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13046496.High-profile_QC_kicked_out_of_disputes_body/
  20. ICC Institute of World Business Law (2018) Training for Court Secretaries. https://iccwbo.org/event/icc-institute-training-tribunal-secretaries-miami/#1489599116575-1e41f4d5-9907
  21. Kenney S (2000) Beyond principals and agents-seeing courts as organizations by comparing Référendaires at the European Court of Justice and Law Clerks at the U.S. Supreme Court. Comp Polit Stud 33(5):593–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Law Council of Australia (2017) Potential rule amendments or improvements to the arbitration and conciliation procedures of the ICSID. https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/about/Public%20Comments%20to%20Amendment%20to%20ICSID%20Rules%20and%20Regulations.pdf
  23. LCIA (last accessed June 2018) Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.lcia.org/frequently_asked_questions.aspx#Secretaries.
  24. Levine J (2015) Late-in the-day arbitrator challenges and resignations. In: Giorgetti C (ed) Challenges and Recusals of Judges and arbitrators in international courts and tribunals. Brill, Leiden Boston, pp 247–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McAuliffe K (2012) Language and law in the European Union. In: Tiersma PM, Solan L (eds) The Oxford handbook of language and law. OUP, Oxford, pp 203–209Google Scholar
  26. Park WW (2009) Arbitrator integrity and investor-state disputes. Contemp Issues Int Arbitr Mediation 3:100–129Google Scholar
  27. Park WW (2012) Investment claims and arbitrator comportment. Transnl Dispute Manage 9(1)Google Scholar
  28. Partasides C (2002) The Fourth Arbitrator? The role of secretaries to tribunals in international arbitration. Arbitr Int 18(2):147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paulsson J (2010) Moral Hazard in international dispute resolution. ICSID Rev - Foreign Invest Law J 25(2):339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polkinghorne M, Rosenberg CB (2014) The role of the tribunal secretary in international arbitration: a call for a uniform standard. Dispute Resol Int 8(2):107–128Google Scholar
  31. Restemayer CJ (2012) Secretaries always get a bad rep: identifying the controversy surrounding administrative secretaries, current guidelines, and recommendations. Yearb Arbitr Mediation 4:328–342Google Scholar
  32. Richman DJ (2008) How to be a great law clerk. Litigation 35(4):16Google Scholar
  33. Rivkin DW (2015) HKIAC Arbitration Week Keynote Address. A new Contract Between Arbitrators and Parties. http://www.sccinstitute.com/media/93206/1000973790v2-hkiac-keynote-address.pdf
  34. Schneider ME (2011) Forbidding unilateral appointments of arbitrators- a case of vicarious hypochondria? ASA Bull 29(2):275Google Scholar
  35. Schwartz E (1995) The Rights and Duties of ICC Arbitrators. ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin. Special Supplement. The Status of the ArbitratorGoogle Scholar
  36. Shetreet S, Forsyth C (2011) The culture of judicial independence: conceptual foundations and practical challenges. Brill Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  37. Titi C (2017) The European Unión’s proposal for an international investment court: significance, innovations and challenges ahead. Transnl Dispute Manage, 1Google Scholar
  38. White & Case and Queen Mary University (2012) International Arbitration Survey: Current and Preferred Practices in the Arbitral Process. www.whitecase.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Arbitration/Queen-Mary-University-London-International-Arbitration-Survey-2012.pdf
  39. White & Case (2018) International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration. https://www.whitecase.com/sites/whitecase/files/files/download/publications/2018-international-arbitration-survey-the-evolution-of-ia.pdf.
  40. Wilske S (2014) The ailing arbitrator-identification, abuse and prevention of a potentially dangerous delaying and obstruction tool. Contemp Asia Arbitr J 7(2):279–308, 301Google Scholar
  41. Wilske S (2016) Linguistic and language issues in international arbitration-problems, pitfalls and Paranoia. Contemp Asia Arbitr J 9(2):159–196Google Scholar
  42. Young International Council for Commercial Arbitration (2014) (ICCA)’s Guide on Arbitral Secretaries. https://pca-cpa.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/175/2016/01/ICCA-Reports-No.-1_Young-ICCA-Guide-on-Arbitral-Secretaries.pdf
  43. Young ICCA (last accessed June 2018) About Young ICCA. http://www.arbitration-icca.org/YoungICCA/AboutYoungICCA.html

Legal and Arbitration References

    International Conventions

    1. UNCITRAL (1985a) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/1985Model_arbitration.html
    2. UNCITRAL (1985b) Travaux Préparatoires. http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/case_law/digests.html

    Arbitration Acts, Institutional Arbitration Rules, and Codes of Conduct

    1. ABA, AAA, CPR Institute (2004) Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/dispute/commercial_disputes.authcheckdam.pdf
    2. CAS (2013) Statutes of the bodies working for the settlement of sports-related disputes. http://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Code20201320corrections20finales20_en_.pdf
    3. CIICA (2016) Code of Ethics for an Arbitrator. http://ciica.org/arbitration/code-of-ethics-for-an-arbitrator/
    4. DCCP (1986) Code of Civil Procedure of the Netherlands. http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/legislation/civilprocedure044.htm
    5. FAI (2016) Note on the Use of a Secretary. Proceedings conducted under the Finland Arbitration Institute (FAI) Arbitration Rules and FAI Expedited Arbitration Rules effective as of 1 June 2013. https://arbitration.fi/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2016/07/note-on-the-use-of-a-secretary.pdf
    6. ICC (2017b) Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the conduct of the arbitration under the ICC rules of arbitration. https://iccwbo.org/publication/note-parties-arbitral-tribunals-conduct-arbitration/
    7. ICDR (2014) International Dispute Resolution Procedures. https://www.adr.org/sites/default/files/ICDR%20Rules_0.pdf
    8. India (2015) The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance. http://www.adrassociation.org/pdf/acact2015.pdf
    9. India (2018) The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill. http://www.arbitrationindia.org/pdf/acbill2018.pdf
    10. KLRCA (2013) Revised Code of Conduct for Arbitrator. https://klrca.org/uploads/imguploadckc691e4fcd34a3f05e49b8eb477d2ec21.PDF
    11. SIAC (2015) Code of Ethics for an Arbitrator. http://www.siac.org.sg/our-rules/code-of-ethics-for-an-arbitrator
    12. SIAC (2017) Investment Arbitration Rules. http://www.siac.org.sg/our-rules/rules/siac-ia-rules-2017
    13. SCC (2017) Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Policy on Appointment of Arbitrators, amended by the SCC board on 8 September 2017. http://www.sccinstitute.com/media/220131/scc-policy-appointment-of-arbitrators-2017.pdf

    Legal Documents

    1. CJEU (2007) Code of Conduct for Members and former Members of the Court of Justice of the European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUri-Serv/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:223:0001:0002:EN:PDF
    2. CJEU (2016) Code of Conduct for Members and former Members of the Court of Justice of the European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C:2016:483:FULL&from=FR
    3. EC (2017) Commission Staff Working Document. Executive summary of the impact assessment. Accompanying the document. Recommendation for a Council Decision authorizing the opening of negotiations for a Convention establishing a multilateral court for the settlement of investment disputes. SWD (2017) 303 final. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/10102/2017/EN/SWD-2017-303-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF
    4. ECJ (2009) Décision de la Cour du 17 février 2009 portant adoption des règles de bonne conduite des Référendaires. https://www.amicuria.com/presentation
    5. Judicial Group on Strengthening Judicial Integrity (2002) Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf
    6. UNCITRAL (2016) Notes on organizing arbitral proceedings. http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-notes/arb-notes-2016-e.pdf
    7. WTO (1994) Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes. DSU. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/28-dsu_e.htm#17
    8. WTO (1996) Rules of Conduct for the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes. WT/DSB/RC/1 (96-5267), https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/rc_e.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katia Fach Gómez
    • 1
  1. 1.Tenured Professor (Profesora Titular) at the Law SchoolUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations