Advertisement

Management of Keratoconus with Scleral Contact Lenses

  • David P. PiñeroEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Scleral contact lenses have always been considered suitable for the correction of irregular astigmatism in keratoconus, as they are able to neutralize irregularities with the tear film meniscus that form with the cornea, while maintaining high levels of comfort. Most of clinical studies on scleral contact lenses in keratoconus report a significant improvement of visual acuity, although this improvement is more limited in advanced keratoconus. The follow-up of all these clinical studies is short in the great majority of cases, being generally of less than 1 year. Therefore, longer-term studies are necessary to know the true behavior of the scleral lens over time and to characterize the possible complications that may appear in the long term. Most of designs of scleral contact lenses that are currently available are rotationally symmetrical, with spherical geometry in the optical zone. The fitting criteria are different depending if the contact lens has a sclero-corneal or fully scleral design. In the case of corneo-scleral lenses, the fitting process is commonly guided by keratometry or topography, with very variable criteria for a good fitting among designs. Concerning fully scleral lenses, the fitting is guided by sagital height.

Keywords

Scleral contact lens Keratoconus Corneo-scleral contact lens Fully scleral contact lens Corneal topography Sagital height Optical coherence tomography 

Suggested Reading

  1. Alipour F, Rahimi F, Hashemian MN, Ajdarkosh Z, Roohipoor R, Mohebi M. Mini-scleral contact lens for management of poor visual outcomes after intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation in keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11:252–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asena L, Altınörs DD. Clinical outcomes of scleral Misa lenses for visual rehabilitation in patients with pellucid marginal degeneration. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39:420–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett M, Lien V, Li JY, Durbin-Johnson B, Mannis MJ. Use of scleral lenses and miniscleral lenses after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42:185–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleshoy H, Pullum KW. Corneal response to gas permeable impression scleral lenses. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1988;11:31–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray C, Britton S, Yeung D, Haines L, Sorbara L. Change in over-refraction after scleral lens settling on average corneas. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruce AS, Nguyen LM. Acuted red eye (non-ulcerative keratitis) associated with mini-scleral contact lens wear for keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom. 2013;96:245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carracedo G, Serramito-Blanco M, Martin-Gil A, Wang Z, Rodriguez-Pomar C, Pintor J. Post-lens tear turbidity and visual quality after scleral lens wear. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100(6):577–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carracedo G, Wang Z, Serramito-Blanco M, Martin-Gil A, Carballo-Alvarez J, Pintor J. Ocular surface temperature during scleral lens wearing in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;43(6):346–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carracedo G, Blanco MS, Martin-Gil A, Zicheng W, Alvarez JC, Pintor J. Short-term effect of scleral lens on the dry eye biomarkers in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:150–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalton K, Sorbana L. Fitting and MSD (Mini Scleral Design) rigid contact lens in advanced keratoconus with INTACS. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011;34:274–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Domínguez-Vicent A, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Recchioni A. Power profiles and in vitro optical quality of scleral contact lenses: effect of the aperture and power. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(3):149–58.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Esen F, Toker E. Influence of apical clearance on mini-scleral lens settling, clinical performance, and corneal thickness changes. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43:230–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harthan J, Nau CB, Barr J, Nau A, Shorter E, Chimato NT, Hodge DO, Schornack MM. Scleral lens prescription and management practices: the SCOPE study. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000387. [Epub ahead of print].
  14. Jedlicka J, Johns LK, Byrnes SP. Scleral contact lens fitting guide. Cont Lens Spec. 2010;3:0–36.Google Scholar
  15. Jimenez RM, Rodríguez PF. Utility of a semi-scleral lens design in the management of the irregular cornea. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36:146–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim S, Lee JS, Park YK, Lee SU, Park YM, Lee JH, Lee JE. Fitting miniscleral contact lenses in Korean patients with keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100:375–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Navascues-Cornago M, Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB. Mechanical sensitivity of the human conjunctiva. Cornea. 2014;33:855–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nixon AD, Barr JT, VanNasdale DA. Corneal epithelial bullae after short-term wear of small diameter scleral lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40:116–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Otchere H, Jones LW, Sorbara L. Effect of time on scleral lens settling and change in corneal clearance. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(9):908–13.  https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pecego M, Barnett M, Mannis MJ, Durbin-Johnson B. Jupiter scleral lenses: the UC Davis Eye Center experience. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38:179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Ruiz-Fortes P, Piñero DP. Reverse geometry hybrid contact lens fitting in a case of donor-host misalignment after keratoplasty. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. 2013;2:69–72.Google Scholar
  22. Piñero DP, Soto-Negro R. Anterior eye profilometry-guided scleral contact lens fitting in keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. 2017;6:1–4.Google Scholar
  23. Piñero DP. Full scleral lens fitting in an eye with high corneal astigmatism after radial keratotomy and several retreatments. I-Site Newsl. 2017.Google Scholar
  24. Piñero DP. Fitting of a new design of full scleral contact lens in advanced keratoconus with previous implantation of intracorneal ring segments. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. 2015;4:56–9.Google Scholar
  25. Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Ruiz-Fortes P, Blanes-Mompó FJ. New-generation hybrid contact lens for the management of extreme irregularity in a thin cornea after unsuccessful excimer laser refractive surgery. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40:e16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Piñero DP. Um novo conceito de lentes de contacto: a lente de apoio completamente escleral. Look Vision Portugal. 2014;29:44–6.Google Scholar
  27. Porcar E, Montalt JC, España-Gregori E, Peris-Martínez C. Corneo-scleral contact lenses in an uncommon case of keratoconus with high hyperopia and astigmatism. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017. 40(5):351–6. pii: S1367-0484(17)30035-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.07.004.
  28. Porcar E, Montalt JC, España-Gregori E, Peris-Martínez C. Corneo-scleral contact lens in a piggyback system for keratoconus: a case report. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40:190–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Porcar E, España E, Montalt JC, Benlloch-Fornés JI, Peris-Martínez C. Post-LASIK visual quality with a corneoscleral contact lens to treat irregular corneas. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43:46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pullum KW, Whiting MA, Buckley RJ. Scleral contact lenses: the expanding role. Cornea. 2005;24:269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pullum KW, Stapleton FJ. Scleral lens induced corneal swelling: what is the effect of varying Dk and lens thickness? CLAO J. 1997;23:259–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pullum KW, Hobley AJ, Davison C. 100 + Dk: does thickness make much difference? J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1991;6:158–61.Google Scholar
  33. Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Dumpati S, Sangwan VS. Change in vault during scleral lens trials assessed with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40:157–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Dumpati S, Vaddavalli PK, Sangwan VS. Boston ocular surface prosthesis: an Indian experience. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59:279–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rocha GA, Miziara PO, Castro AC, Rocha AA. Visual rehabilitation using mini-scleral contact lenses after penetrating keratoplasty. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017;80:17–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Segal O, Barkana Y, Hourovitz D, Behrman S, Kamun Y, Avni I, Zadok D. Scleral contact lenses may help where other modalities fail. Cornea. 2003;22:308–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Severinsky B, Behrman S, Pery JF, Solomon A. Scleral contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty: long term outcomes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schornack MM, Patel SV. Scleral lenses in the management of keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suarez C, Madariaga V, Lepage B, Malecaze M, Fournié P, Soler V, Galiacy S, Mély R, Cassagne M, Malecaze F. First experience with the ICD 16.5 mini-scleral lens for optic and therapeutic purposes. Eye Contact Lens. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  40. Tomalla M, Cagnolati W. Modern treatment options for the therapy of keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30:61–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van der Worp E, Bornman D, Ferreira DL, Faria-Ribeiro M, Garcia-Porta N, González-Meijome JM. Modern scleral contact lenses: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:240–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van der Worp E. A guide to scleral lens fitting. Books and monographs. Book. Forest Grove: Pacific University; 2011. (http://commons.pacificu.edu/mono/54).
  43. Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ. The temporal dynamics of miniscleral contact lenses: central corneal clearance and centration. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017. pii: S1367-0484(17)30171-6. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.07.002. [Epub ahead of print].
  44. Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ, Beanland A, Lam L, Lim CC, Loke A, Nguyen N. Hypoxic corneal changes following eight hours of scleral contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:293–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Visser ES, Soeters N, Tahzib NG. Scleral lens tolerance after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:318–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Visser ES, Van der Linden BJJJ, Otten HM, Van der Lelij A, Visser R. Medical applications and outcomes of bitangential scleral lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:1078–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Visser ES, Visser R, van Lier HJ, Otten HM. Modern scleral lenses part I: clinical features. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker MK, Bergmanson JP, Miller WL, Marsack JD, Johnson LA. Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39:88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weber SL, de Souza RB, Gomes JÁ, Hofling-Lima AL. The use of the esclera scleral contact lens in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;163:167–73.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weber SL, Ambrósio R Jr, Lipener C, Coral-Ghanem C, Hofling-Lima AL. The use of ocular anatomical measurements using a rotating Scheimpflug camera to assist in the Esclera® scleral contact lens fitting process. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39:148–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yuksel E, Bilgihan K, Novruzlu Ş, Yuksel N, Koksal M. The management of refractory dry eye with semi-scleral contact lens. Eye Contact Lens. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Optics, Pharmacology and AnatomyUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.Department of Ophthalmology (OFTALMAR)Vithas Medimar International HospitalAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations