Advertisement

Why Full-Thickness Penetrating Keratoplasty and Not Deep Anterior Lamelar Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Keratoconus

  • Hadas Ben-Eli
  • Abraham Solomon
Chapter

Abstract

Over the past decade Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) has been proposed as a preferred surgical option over Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP) for the management of keratoconus (KC) and other anterior stromal diseases. However DALK is associated with a considerable number of problems which still prevent its acceptance by most corneal surgeons. DALK is a time consuming procedure, technically demanding, and is associated with a long and steep learning curve, even for experienced corneal surgeons. At the same time patients after DALK have comparable visual results to those of PKP, as well as comparable results in terms of refractive errors and residual astigmatism. In addition DALK is more costly compared to PKP as a result of the longer surgical time and higher number of follow-up visits. On a long-term follow-up PKP is associated with higher rates of graft rejection, while in DALK there is more interface haze as a result of retained host stroma. Whereas DALK is a procedure limited for anterior stromal corneal disorders with an intact descemet’s membrane, PKP can be used for all corneal pathologies that require replacement of the cornea, including descemet abnormalities such as hydrops in severe KC, penetrating trauma and herpetic infections where the endothelium is likely to be involved. The consistent reports of comparable visual outcomes for both PKP and DALK suggest there is no preference in choosing DALK over PKP. As long as more efficient, reproducible and easy to perform steps in DALK are developed, PKP will remain a valid and more popular option in corneal transplantation for keratoconus and other anterior stromal disorders.

Keywords

Keratoconus Cornea Corneal transplantation Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) 

References

  1. 1.
    Amayem AF, Hamdi IM, Hamdi MM. Refractive and visual outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with hydrodissection for treatment of keratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32(4):30–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Röck T, Landenberger J, Bramkamp M, Bartz-Schmidt KURD. The evolution of corneal transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2017;22:749–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crawford AZ, Mckelvie J, Craig JP, Mcghee CNJ, Patel DV. Corneal transplantation in Auckland, New Zealand, 1999–2009: indications, patient characteristics, ethnicity, social deprivation, and access to services. Cornea. 2017;36(5):546–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rezaei Kanavi M, Javadi MA, Motevasseli T, Chamani T, Rezaei Kanavi M, Kheiri BSS. Trends in indications and techniques of corneal transplantation in Iran from 2006 to 2013; an 8-year review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(2):146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen AW, Goins KM, Sutphin JE, Wandling GR, Wagoner MD. Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30:675–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Javadi MA, Feizi S, Yazdani S, Mirbabaee F. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating. Cornea. 2010;29(4):365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khattak A, Nakhli FR, Abdullah KMA. Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;38:992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jafarinasab MR, Feizi S, Javadi MA, Hashemloo A. Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36:417–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu H, Chen Y, Wang P, et al. Efficacy and safety of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty vs. penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a meta-analysis. Taylor AW, ed. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0113332.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113332.
  10. 10.
    Feizi S, Javadi MA, Kanavi MR. Cellular changes of donor corneal tissue after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus : a confocal study. Cornea. 2010;29(8):866–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keane M, Coster D, Ziaei M WK. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD009700.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamdi IM, Hamdi MM. Quality of vision after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (fluid dissection ) compared to penetrating keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:7–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kubaloglu A, Coskun E, Sari ES, et al. Comparison of astigmatic keratotomy results in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(4):637–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oh BL, Kim MK, Wee WR. Comparison of clinical outcomes of same-size grafting between deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013;27(5):322–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shimazaki J, Ishii N, Shinzawa M, Yamaguchi T. How much progress has been made in corneal. Cornea. 2015;34(11):105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kasbekar SA, Jones MNA, Ahmad S, et al. Corneal transplant surgery for keratoconus and the effect of surgeon experience on deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(6):1239–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Den Biggelaar FJHM, Cheng YYY, Nuijts RMMA, et al. Economic evaluation of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the Netherlands. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(3):449–59.e2.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koytak A, Kubaloglu A, Sari ES, Atakan M, Culfa SOY. Changes in central macular thickness after uncomplicated corneal transplantation for keratoconus: penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(12):2009–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gonzalez-salinas R, Hernandez-zimbron LF, Hernandez-quintela E, Sanchez-huerta V. Indications and outcomes of pediatric keratoplasty in a tertiary eye care center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hadas Ben-Eli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abraham Solomon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyHadassah-Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Optometry and Vision ScienceHadassah Academic CollegeJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations