Advertisement

Innovative Approaches in the Delivery of Eye Care: Refractive Errors (Including Presbyopia)

  • Kovin S. NaidooEmail author
  • Pirindhavellie Govender
  • Jyoti Naidoo
Chapter
Part of the Essentials in Ophthalmology book series (ESSENTIALS)

Abstract

The global prevalence of blindness and vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error amplifies the need for the delivery of refractive services. Effective strategies need to be employed in order to ensure that they leave an impression on the landscape of refractive error blindness and vision impairment. The approaches must be systematic and evidence-based. Recent studies which plot the refractive error challenges impress upon practitioners across the eye health gamut the need to effect change immediately in an effective, sustainable and equitable manner.

The approaches employed to reduce the burden of blindness and vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error can be categorised as public sector, NGO-driven, social entrepreneurship, private sector and public-private partnership. Contextual variations demand careful planning, implementation, evaluation and remediation of approaches used to achieve accessible refractive service delivery.

This chapter focuses on the different models of refractive service delivery used across the globe. It explores the strengths and weaknesses of each model and key factors for their success and challenges.

Keywords

Uncorrected refractive error Models of refractive service delivery Vision impairment 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

Compliance with ethical requirements: Kovin Naidoo, Prindha Govender and Jyothi Jaggernath declare that they have no conflict of interest.No human or animal studies were carried out by the authors for this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Bennet I. Optometric practice management. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bourne RR, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990—2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(6):e339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brien Holden Vision Institute. Academic vision centre handed over in Malawi. 2015. Available at: http://www.brienholdenvision.org/media-centre/latest-news/803-academic-vision-centre-handed-over-in-malawi.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
  4. 4.
    Brien Holden Vision Institute. Vision centre development. 2015. Available at: http://www.brienholdenvision.org/global-eye-care/vision-centre-development.html. Accessed 10 De 2015.
  5. 5.
    Businessdictionary.com. Social enterprise. Business Dictionary. 2015. p. 1–7. Available at: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/social-enterprise.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2015.
  6. 6.
    Chen S. Smartphone and tablet apps in eye care. Mivision. 2014;(88):59–3. Available at: http://www.gpce.com.au/RXAU/RXAU_GPCE_V2/documents/2014/SmartphoneAppsineyecare.pdf?v=635321744137370106.
  7. 7.
    Dandona R, et al. Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(3):615–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dias L, Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial Group, et al. The relationship between self-esteem of myopic children and ocular and demographic characteristics. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(11):688–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dirani M, et al. Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(8):997–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dusek W, et al. A survey of visual function in an Austrian population of school-age children with reading and writing difficulties. BMC Ophthal. 2010;10(16):1–10.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Essilor. Using mobile solutions to access all areas. See change. 2015. Available at: http://www.essilorseechange.com/using-mobile-solutions-to-access-all-areas/. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  12. 12.
    Frick KD, et al. The global burden of potential productivity loss from uncorrected presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2015. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26190438. Accessed 18 Jul 2015.
  13. 13.
    George J, et al. Apparatus and processes for preventing or delaying one or more symptoms of presbyopia. United States Patent. US 7252662 B2. 2007. http://www.google.com/patents/US7252662.
  14. 14.
    Gillani R. The eye health programme in Dera Ghazi Khan district, Pakistan. Commun Eye Health Int Cent Eye Health. 2005;18(54):94. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1705678&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 9 Dec 2015.
  15. 15.
    Goh PP, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in Gombak District, Malaysia. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):678–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gong JF, et al. Relevant factors of estrogen changes of myopia in adolescent females. Chin Med J. 2015;128:659–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    He M, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):374–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holden B, et al. Myopia, an underrated global challenge to vision: where the current data takes us on myopia control. Eye. 2014;28(2):142–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holden BA, et al. Challenges of providing spectacles in the developing world. Commun Eye Health J. 2000;13(33):9–10.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holden BA. Uncorrected refractive error: the major and most easily avoidable cause of vision loss. Commun Eye Health Int Cent Eye Health. 2007;20(63):37–9. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2040245&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holden BA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huon T. Experiences with optical centres in West Africa. Commun Eye Health J. 2007;20(63):53.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    International Finance Corporation. IFC support to health public-private partnerships. 2010. Available at: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/b10f4080498391e2865cd6336b93d75f/IFC_Support2Health_WEB.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=b10f4080498391e2865cd6336b93d75f.
  24. 24.
    Jones LA, et al. Parental history of myopia, sports and outdoor activities, and future myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(8):3524–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klein AP, et al. Support for polygenic influences on ocular refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(2):442–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumaran SE, et al. Refractive error and vision-related quality of life in Southern Indian children. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(3):272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Light for the World. Ophthalmology in development cooperation. Vision Dev. 2010;(2);14. Available at: National Intervention on Uncorrected Refractive Errors (NIURE) project in Uganda.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ma X, et al. Effect of providing free glasses on children’s educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349:g5740.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5740.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marmamula S, et al. Rapid assessment methods in eye care: an overview. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60:416–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mashige KP, Naidoo KS. Optometric practices and practitioners in KwaZu- lu-Natal, South Africa. Afr Vision Eye Health. 2010;69(2):77–85.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maul E, et al. Refractive error study in children: results from La Florida, Chile. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(4):445–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McBrien NA, et al. A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult-progression of myopia in an occupational group. Refractive and biometric findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(20):321–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Metlapally R, et al. Genetic association of insulin-like growth factor-1 polymorphisms with high-grade myopia in an international family cohort. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(9):4476–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mutti DO, et al. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(12):3633–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Murthy GV, et al. Refractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(3):623–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Naidoo KS, et al. Scaling up the delivery of refractive error services within a district health system: the KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa experience. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:361. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3852626&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 3 Aug 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Naidoo KS, et al. Global visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error: 1990–2010. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(3):227–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Naidoo KS, Jaggernath J. Uncorrected refractive errors. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(5):432–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Naidoo KS, Raghunandan A, Mashige KP, Govender P, Holden BA, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in African children in South Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(9):3764–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Negrel AD, et al. Refractive error study in children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(4):421–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patel I, et al. Change in function and spectacle-use 2 months after providing presbyopic spectacles in rural Tanzania. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(6):685–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Patel I, West SK. Presbyopia: prevalence, impact, and interventions. Commun Eye Health J. 2007;20(63):40–1.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peet JA, et al. Heritability and familial aggregation of refractive error in the Old Order Amish. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(9):4002–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pokharel GP, et al. Refractive error study in children: results from Mechi Zone, Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(4):436–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rao GN. The Barrie Jones lecture – Eye care for the neglected population: challenges and solutions. Eye (Basingstoke). 2015;29(1):30–45. Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84920556087&partnerID=40&md5=cf48b92010a4469fac7075fd1e2e15fd.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Resnikoff S, et al. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(1):63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Russo A, Semeraro F, Romano MR, Mastropasqua R, Dell’Omo R, Costagliola C. Myopia onset and progression: can it be prevented? Int Ophthalmol. 2014;34(3):693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Savur S. The perceptions regarding refractive errors and their psychosocial impact on youth in Dakshina Kannada. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5:746–8. Available at: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=emed10&AN=2011458173<1029.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Saw SM, et al. A cohort study of incident myopia in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(5):1839–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shashidhar S, et al. Factors affecting scholastic performances of adolescents. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76(5):495–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shankar S, Evans MA, Bobier WR, et al. Hyperopia and emergent literacy of young children: pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(11):1031–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shimizu N, et al. Refractive errors and factors associated with myopia in an adult Japanese population. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47(1):6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Srinivasan A. Driving down the cost of high-quality care: lessons from the Aravind Eye Care System. Health Int. 2011;18–7.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stevens GA, et al. Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990–2010. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2377–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wensor M, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(5):658–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Westling L, et al. Craniofacial manifestations in the Marfan syndrome: palatal dimensions and a comparative cephalometric analysis. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1998;18(4):211–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wojciechowski R, et al. Fine-mapping of candidate region in Amish and Ashkenazi families confirms linkage of refractive error to a QTL on 1p34-p35. Mol Vis. 2009;15:1398–406.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Education, socioeconomic status, and ocular dimensions in Chinese adults: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(9):963–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    World Health Organisation. Uncorrected refractive error, including presbyopia. Geneva; 2011.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    www.4lenses.org. Toward an integrated social enterprise methodology. The Four Lenses Strategic Framework. 2010. Available at: http://www.4lenses.org/setypology/ise. Accessed 8 Dec 2015.
  61. 61.
    Zhang M, et al. Population density and refractive error among Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(10):4969–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kovin S. Naidoo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pirindhavellie Govender
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jyoti Naidoo
    • 1
  1. 1.African Vision Research InstituteUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa
  2. 2.Brien Holden Vision InstituteSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations