Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Gemma K. Bird
Chapter
Part of the International Political Theory book series (IPoT)

Abstract

This final chapter ties the book together, reiterating the arguments of the other chapters that the claims of many of the thinkers engaged with are underpinned by a foundational belief in the value of internal and external self-law giving. By establishing evidence for this a priori claim within a range of African political movements the chapter reiterates the argument for a weak universalism able to recognise both the universality of self-law giving as well as the culturally specific approaches to achieving it. The chapter concludes by reiterating the key claim of the book, that respect for internal and external self-law giving should be viewed foundationally and thus respected if we are going to engage in just and fair cross-cultural dialogue in the process of international norm formation.

References

  1. Dallmayr, F. (2010). Comparative Political Theory: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gyekye, K. (1992). Person and Community in African Thought. In K. Gyekye & K. Wiredu (Eds.), Person and Community. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  4. Ireland, S. (2004). Narratives of Return. In S. Ireland & P. Proulx (Eds.), Textualising the Immigrant Experience in Contemporary Quebec. Westport, CT: Prager Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Kant, I. (2006/1784). An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In P. Kleingeld (Ed.), Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kant, I. (2009/1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Paton, H. Trans.). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  7. Mosser, K. (1999). Kant and Feminism. Kant-Studien, 90, 322–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nagel, T. (1987). Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16(3), 215–240.Google Scholar
  9. Nkrumah, K. (2006). Revolutionary Path. London: Panaf Books.Google Scholar
  10. Parekh, B. (2002). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Pogge, T. (2012). Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism?’. In E. Ellis (Ed.), Kant’s Political Theory. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Saul, J. (1991). Mozambique: The Failure of Socialism. Transformations, 14(1), 104–110.Google Scholar
  13. Schneider, L. (2004). Freedom and Unfreedom in Rural Development: Julius Nyerere, Ujamaa Vijijini, and Villagisation. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 38(2), 344–392.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gemma K. Bird
    • 1
  1. 1.PoliticsUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations