Advertisement

Understanding (Neo)liberalism: The Relationship Between the Liberal State and Free Market Capitalism

  • Alen Toplišek
Chapter
Part of the The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy book series (PSTCD)

Abstract

This chapter constructs a critical political economy approach through which the author analyses the impact liberalism has had on structuring the role of the state in Western market economies in the nineteenth century and after the 1970s. Through Michel Foucault’s notion of governmentality, the author traces the development of liberalism and the key transformations of the state, ultimately leading to its crises. Karl Polanyi’s theory of the dynamics between liberal elites and the social counter-movement is then employed to account for the emergence of alternative governmentalities that protect the ordinary people from the deleterious effects of market liberalisation. The author argues that this novel theoretical approach can provide insights for the contemporary crisis of liberal democracy.

References

  1. Balibar, Étienne. 1992. Foucault and Marx: The Question of Nominalism. In Michel Foucault, Philosopher, ed. Timothy J. Armstrong. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, Andrew, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, eds. 1996. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  3. Birchfield, Vicki. 1999. Contesting the Hegemony of Market Ideology: Gramsci’s ‘Good Sense’ and Polanyi’s ‘Double Movement’. Review of International Political Economy 6 (1): 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Block, Fred. 2003. Karl Polanyi and the Writing of “The Great Transformation”. Theory and Society 32 (3): 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, Patrick. 2005. Gramsci, Polanyi and Impressions from Africa on the Social Forum Phenomenon. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (2): 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brännström, Linda. 2014. Law, Objectives of Government, and Regimes of Truth: Foucault’s Understanding of Law and the Transformation of the Law of the EU Internal Market. Foucault Studies 18 (October): 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, Wendy. 2003. Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy. Theory & Event 7 (1). Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/48659. 21 June 2016.
  8. ———. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’ Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  9. Burawoy, Michael. 2003. For a Sociological Marxism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics & Society 31 (2): 193–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2014. Marxism After Polanyi. In Marxisms in the 21st Century: Crisis, Critique & Struggle, ed. Michelle Williams and Vishwas Satgar, 34–52. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burchell, Graham. 1991. Peculiar Interests: Civil Society and Governing “The System of Natural Liberty”. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, eds. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller, 119–150. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 1996. Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self. In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government, ed. Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, 19–36. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  13. Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cangiani, Michele. 2011. Karl Polanyi’s Institutional Theory: Market Society and Its “Disembedded” Economy. Journal of Economic Issues 45 (1): 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daldal, Asli. 2014. Power and Ideology in Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci: A Comparative Analysis. Review of History and Political Science 2 (2): 149–167.Google Scholar
  16. Dale, Gareth. 2010. Karl Polanyi: The Limits of the Market. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2014. The Iron Law of Democratic Socialism: British and Austrian Influences on the Young Karl Polanyi. Economy and Society 43 (4): 650–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deane, Phyllis. 1979. The First Industrial Revolution. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Flew, Terry. 2012. Michel Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics and Contemporary Neo-liberalism Debates. Thesis Eleven 108 (1): 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fontana, Alessandro, and Mauro Bertani. 2003. Situating the Lectures. In Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975–76, ed. Alessandro Fontana and Mauro Bertani, 273–293. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Ed. Michel Senellart. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2009. Security, Territory, Population, Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978. Ed. Michel Senellart. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Gane, Nicholas. 2014. The Emergence of Neoliberalism: Thinking Through and Beyond Michel Foucault’s Lectures on Biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (4): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey, David. 1982. The Limits of Capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2011. The Enigma of Capital: And the Crises of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  28. Holmes, Cristopher. 2014. Introduction: A Post-Polanyian Political Economy for Our Times. Economy and Society 43 (4): 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jessop, Bob. 2004. Poulantzas and Foucault on Power and Strategy. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/16356111/Poulantzas_and_Foucault_on_power_and_strategy. 25 August 2018.
  30. ———. 2007. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kenway, Jane. 1990. Education and the Right’s Discursive Politics: Private vs. State Schooling. In Foucault and Education: Discipline and Knowledge, ed. Stephen J. Ball, 167–206. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Kreps, David, ed. 2015. Gramsci and Foucault: A Reassessment. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. Lemke, Thomas. 2002. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism 14 (3): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2007. An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 8 (2): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2014. The Risks of Security: Liberalism, Biopolitics, and Fear. In The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism, ed. Vanessa Lemm and Miguel Vatter, 59–74. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lemm, Vanessa, and Miguel Vatter, eds. 2014. The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Luebbert, Gregory M. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  39. Maucourant, Jerome, and Sebastien Plociniczak. 2013. The Institution, the Economy and the Market: Karl Polanyi’s Institutional Thought for Economists. Review of Political Economy 25 (3): 512–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Niemi, William L. 2011. Karl Marx’s Sociological Theory of Democracy: Civil Society and Political Rights. The Social Science Journal 48 (1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ong, Aihwa. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Polanyi, Karl. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1980. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  44. Rose, Nikolas. 1996. Governing “Advanced” Liberal Democracies. In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government, ed. Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, 37–64. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rose, Nikolas, and Peter Miller. 1992. Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. The British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sayers, Sean. 2007. Individual and Society in Marx and Hegel: Beyond the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. Science & Society 71 (1): 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Selwyn, Benjamin, and Satoshi Miyamura. 2014. Class Struggle or Embedded Markets? Marx, Polanyi and the Meanings and Possibilities of Social Transformation. New Political Economy 19 (5): 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smart, Barry. 1999. The Politics of Truth and the Problem of Hegemony. In Foucault: A Critical Reader, ed. David C. Hoy, 157–174. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2002. Michel Foucault: Critical Assessments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Zamora, Daniel, and Michael C. Behrent, eds. 2016. Foucault and Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alen Toplišek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Politics and International StudiesSOAS University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations