Advertisement

Digital Disability Divide in Finland

  • Anne-Marie Tuikka
  • Hannu Vesala
  • Antti Teittinen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 907)

Abstract

The modern societies have become more and more digitalized during recent years. Owning a digital device and accessing internet at home are part of everyday life, while many essential services, such as banking, are offered through internet. However, advances in digital technologies have not affected everybody similarly and there can still be groups of people who do not use internet on daily bases. Hence, we concentrates on studying the digital divide from specific viewpoint – the one of people with disabilities. Prior studies indicate that their possibilities to access and use internet are lower than for people without disabilities. This gap is referred as digital disability divide.

This study employs a quantitative approach to analyse digital disability divide in technologically advanced society. Our data is retrieved from a nationwide survey, which was conducted in Finland during years 2012–2015 by National Institute for Health and Welfare. The data was analysed regarding two main aspects: access to internet and use of internet. The analyses focused on people with disabilities and their family members. The results indicate that both access rate and usage of internet are lower among them than the rest of the population.

Keywords

People with disabilities Disabled people Digital divide Disability divide Digital disability divide Finland 

References

  1. 1.
    Watling, S.: Digital exclusion: coming out from behind closed doors. Disabil. Soc. 26(4), 491–495 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Näslund, R., Gardelli, Å.: ‘I know, i can, i will try’: youths and adults with intellectual disabilities in Sweden using information and communication technology in their everyday life. Disabil. Soc. 28(1), 28–40 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Højberg, A.-L., Jeppesen, J.: Examining the effect of networks for students with special educational needs. Scand. J. Disabil. Res. 14(2), 26–147 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F.: Digital divide across the European union. Inf. Manag. 49, 278–291 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scholz, F., Yalcin, B., Priestley, M.: Internet access for disabled people: understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychology: J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 11(1), 13 p. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-4
  6. 6.
    Çilan, Ç., Bolat, B.A., Coşkun, E.: Analyzing digital divide within and between member and candidate countries of European union. Gov. Inf. Q. 26, 98–105 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cruz-Jesus, F., Vicente, M.R., Bacao, F., Oliveira, T.: The education-related digital divide: an analysis for the EU-28. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 72–82 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandtzæg, P.B.: Understanding the new digital divide—a typology of Internet users in Europe. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69, 123–138 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: The disability divide in internet access and use. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9(3), 313–334 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sachdeva, N., Tuikka, A.-T., Kimppa, K.K., Suomi, R.: Digital disability divide in information society: a framework based on a structured literature review. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 13(3/4), 283–298 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nam, S.-J., Park, E.-Y.: The effects of the smart environment on the information divide experienced by people with disabilities. Disabil. Health J. 10, 257–263 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newman, L., Browne-Yung, K., Raghavendra, P., Wood, D., Grace, E.: Applying a critical approach to investigate barriers to digital inclusion and online social networking among young people with disabilities. Inf. Syst. J. 27, 559–588 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare: Still unequal – living conditions for people with functional impairments (2010). http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2010/2010-6-21. Accessed 27 Mar 2018
  14. 14.
    Chiner, E., Gómez-Puerta, M., Cardona-Moltó, M.C.: Internet use, risks and online behaviour: the view of internet users with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 45, 190–197 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duplaga, M.: Digital divide among people with disabilities: analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online. PLoS One 16(6), 1–19 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramsten, C., Hammar, L.M., Martin, L., Göransson, K.: ICT and intellectual disability: a survey of organizational support at the municipal level in Sweden. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 30, 705–713 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Kela. Kelan tilastollinen vuosikirja (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Marie Tuikka
    • 1
  • Hannu Vesala
    • 2
  • Antti Teittinen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Turku (Turun yliopisto)TurkuFinland
  2. 2.Finnish Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities FAIDDHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations