Advertisement

Congenital Hydrocephalus

  • Charuta Gavankar Furey
  • Prince Antwi
  • Kristopher Thomas Kahle
Chapter

Abstract

Congenital hydrocephalus (CH) is due to disordered cerebrospinal fluid homeostasis that results in clinically significant ventriculomegaly. It is the most common disease treated by pediatric neurosurgeons and represents a tremendous burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. CH may be primary (also called developmental) or secondary (also called acquired) based on its etiology. Our understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of CH remains nascent, but advances in Genetics and Molecular Biology have elucidated some mechanisms in the etiopathogenesis of this disease. Mutations in more than 100 human genes have been identified to cause syndromic forms of primary CH; mutations in much fewer genes have been identified in nonsyndromic forms of primary CH. Here, we review the molecular genetics of congenital hydrocephalus, drawing from studies in both humans and nonhuman vertebrates. A comprehensive understanding of the key genetic drivers and the associated molecular mechanisms of CH might help identify targets for the development of novel therapeutics for this disorder of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) homeostasis.

Keywords

Congenital hydrocephalus genetics Communicating hydrocephalus Noncommunicating hydrocephalus Syndromic hydrocephalus Nonsyndromic hydrocephalus Ventriculomegaly 

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang J, Williams MA, Rigamonti D. Genetics of human hydrocephalus. J Neurol. 2006;253:1255–66.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0245-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahle KT, Kulkarni AV, Limbrick DD, Warf BC. Hydrocephalus in children. Lancet. 2016;387:788–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60694-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    du Plessis AJ, Robinson S, Volpe JJ. Congenital hydrocephalus. In: Volpe’s neurology of the newborn. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. p. 58–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-42876-7.00003-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riva-Cambrin J, et al. Center effect and other factors influencing temporization and shunting of cerebrospinal fluid in preterm infants with intraventricular hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;9:473–81.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.1.PEDS11292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McAllister JP 2nd. Pathophysiology of congenital and neonatal hydrocephalus. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17:285–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2012.06.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindquist B, Persson EK, Uvebrant P, Carlsson G. Learning, memory and executive functions in children with hydrocephalus. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:596–601.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00747.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lacy M, Baldassarre M, Nader T, Frim D. Parent ratings of executive functioning in children with shunted hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012;48:73–9.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000339313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tully HM, Dobyns WB. Infantile hydrocephalus: a review of epidemiology, classification and causes. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:359–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.06.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kousi M, Katsanis N. The genetic basis of hydrocephalus. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2016;39:409–35.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-014023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wright Z, Larrew TW, Eskandari R. Pediatric hydrocephalus: current state of diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Rev. 2016;37:478–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oi S. Classification of hydrocephalus: critical analysis of classification categories and advantages of “Multi-categorical Hydrocephalus Classification”. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27:1523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP. An epidemiologic study of environmental and genetic factors in congenital hydrocephalus. Eur J Epidemiol. 1992;8:797–803.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00145322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Price JR Jr, Horne BM. Family history indicating hereditary factors in hydrocephalus. Ment Retard. 1968;6:40–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tipton RE. Familial hydrocephalus. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1971;7:231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munch TN, et al. Familial aggregation of congenital hydrocephalus in a nationwide cohort. Brain J Neurol. 2012;135:2409–15.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fernell E, Hagberg B, Hagberg G, von Wendt L. Epidemiology of infantile hydrocephalus in Sweden. III. Origin in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987;76:418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fernell E, Hagberg B, Hagberg G, von Wendt L. Epidemiology of infantile hydrocephalus in Sweden. II. Origin in infants born at term. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987;76:411–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haverkamp F, et al. Congenital hydrocephalus internus and aqueduct stenosis: aetiology and implications for genetic counselling. Eur J Pediatr. 1999;158:474–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Verhagen JM, et al. Congenital hydrocephalus in clinical practice: a genetic diagnostic approach. Eur J Med Genet. 2011;54:e542–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2011.06.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finckh U, Schroder J, Ressler B, Veske A, Gal A. L1CAM mutations in isolated and familial cases with clinically suspected L1-disease. Am J Med Genet. 2000;92:40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosenthal A, Jouet M, Kenwrick S. Aberrant splicing of neural cell adhesion molecule L1 mRNA in a family with X-linked hydrocephalus. Nat Genet. 1992;2:107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Willems PJ, Brouwer OF, Dijkstra I, Wilmink J. X-linked hydrocephalus. Am J Med Genet. 1987;27:921–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adle-Biassette H, et al. Neuropathological review of 138 cases genetically tested for X-linked hydrocephalus: evidence for closely related clinical entities of unknown molecular bases. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126:427–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1146-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maness PF, Schachner M. Neural recognition molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily: signal transducers of axon guidance and neuronal migration. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patzke C, Acuna C, Giam LR, Wernig M, Sudhof TC. Conditional deletion of L1CAM in human neurons impairs both axonal and dendritic arborization and action potential generation. J Exp Med. 2016;213:499–515.  https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20150951.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tully HM, et al. Two hundred thirty-six children with developmental hydrocephalus: causes and clinical consequences. J Child Neurol. 2016;31:309–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073815592222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Itoh K, Fushiki S. The role of L1cam in murine corticogenesis, and the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus. Pathol Int. 2015;65:58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.12245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Strain L, Wright AF, Bonthron DT. Fried syndrome is a distinct X linked mental retardation syndrome mapping to Xp22. J Med Genet. 1997;34:535–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tarpey PS, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the sigma 2 subunit of the adaptor protein 1 complex, AP1S2, cause X-linked mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:1119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cacciagli P, et al. AP1S2 is mutated in X-linked Dandy-Walker malformation with intellectual disability, basal ganglia disease and seizures (Pettigrew syndrome). Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:363–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saillour Y, et al. Mutations in the AP1S2 gene encoding the sigma 2 subunit of the adaptor protein 1 complex are associated with syndromic X-linked mental retardation with hydrocephalus and calcifications in basal ganglia. J Med Genet. 2007;44:739–44.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2007.051334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reusch U, Bernhard O, Koszinowski U, Schu P. AP-1A and AP-3A lysosomal sorting functions. Traffic. 2002;3:752–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Klezovitch K, Fernandez TE, Tapscott SJ, Vasioukhin V. Loss of cell polarity causes severe brain dysplasia in Lgl1 knockout mice. Genes Dev. 2004;18:559–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chae TH, Kim S, Marz KE, Hanson PI, Walsh CA. The hyh mutation uncovers roles for αSnap in apical protein localization and control of neural cell fate. Nat Genet. 2004;36:264–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ekici AB, et al. Disturbed Wnt signalling due to a mutation in CCDC88C causes an autosomal recessive non-syndromic hydrocephalus with medial diverticulum. Mol Syndromol. 2010;1:99–112.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000319859.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Drielsma A, et al. Two novel CCDC88C mutations confirm the role of DAPLE in autosomal recessive congenital hydrocephalus. J Med Genet. 2012;49:708–12.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ruggeri G, et al. Bi-allelic mutations of CCDC88C are a rare cause of severe congenital hydrocephalus. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:676–81.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38592.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ishida-Takagishi M, et al. The Dishevelled-associating protein Daple controls the non-canonical Wnt/Rac pathway and cell motility. Nat Commun. 2012;3:859.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ohata S, et al. Loss of Dishevelleds disrupts planar polarity in ependymal motile cilia and results in hydrocephalus. Neuron. 2014;83:558–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Al-Dosari MS, et al. Mutation in MPDZ causes severe congenital hydrocephalus. J Med Genet. 2013;50:54–8.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sotak BN, Gleeson JG. Can’t get there from here: cilia and hydrocephalus. Nat Med. 2012;18:1742–3.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Feldner A, et al. Loss of Mpdz impairs ependymal cell integrity leading to perinatal-onset hydrocephalus in mice. EMBO Mol Med. 2017;9:890–905.  https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201606430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shaheen R, et al. The genetic landscape of familial congenital hydrocephalus. Ann Neurol. 2017;81:890–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24964.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kielar M, et al. Mutations in Eml1 lead to ectopic progenitors and neuronal heterotopia in mouse and human. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:923–33.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bizzotto S, et al. Eml1 loss impairs apical progenitor spindle length and soma shape in the developing cerebral cortex. Sci Rep. 2017;7:17308.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15253-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gulsuner S, et al. Homozygosity mapping and targeted genomic sequencing reveal the gene responsible for cerebellar hypoplasia and quadrupedal locomotion in a consanguineous kindred. Genome Res. 2011;21:1995–2003.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.126110.111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Traka M, et al. WDR81 is necessary for purkinje and photoreceptor cell survival. J Neurosci. 2013;33:6834–44.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2394-12.2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cavallin M, et al. WDR81 mutations cause extreme microcephaly and impair mitotic progression in human fibroblasts and Drosophila neural stem cells. Brain. 2017;140:2597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shankar P, Zamora C, Castillo M. Congenital malformations of the brain and spine. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;136:1121–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53486-6.00058-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Copp AJ, Greene ND. Genetics and development of neural tube defects. J Pathol. 2010;220:217–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mitchell LE. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2005;135C:88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Balashova OA, Visina O, Borodinsky LN. Folate action in nervous system development and disease. Dev Neurobiol. 2018;78:391–402.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nikolopoulou E, Galea GL, Rolo A, Greene ND, Copp AJ. Neural tube closure: cellular, molecular and biomechanical mechanisms. Development. 2017;144:552–66.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.145904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    van Reeuwijk J, et al. Intragenic deletion in the LARGE gene causes Walker-Warburg syndrome. Hum Genet. 2007;121:685–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-007-0362-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shaheen R, Faqeih E, Ansari S, Alkuraya FS. A truncating mutation in B3GNT1 causes severe Walker-Warburg syndrome. Neurogenetics. 2013;14:243–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-013-0367-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bouchet-Seraphin C, Vuillaumier-Barrot S, Seta N. Dystroglycanopathies: about numerous genes involved in glycosylation of one single glycoprotein. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2015;2:27–38.  https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-140047.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Roscioli T, et al. Mutations in ISPD cause Walker-Warburg syndrome and defective glycosylation of alpha-dystroglycan. Nat Genet. 2012;44:581–5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2253.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yoshida A, et al. Muscular dystrophy and neuronal migration disorder caused by mutations in a glycosyltransferase, POMGnT1. Dev Cell. 2001;1:717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lesnik Oberstein SA, et al. Peters Plus syndrome is caused by mutations in B3GALTL, a putative glycosyltransferase. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:562–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Waters AM, et al. The kinetochore protein, CENPF, is mutated in human ciliopathy and microcephaly phenotypes. J Med Genet. 2015;52:147–56.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pennarun G, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in a human gene related to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii dynein IC78 result in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:1508–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Olbrich H, et al. Mutations in DNAH5 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia and randomization of left-right asymmetry. Nat Genet. 2002;30:143–4.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng817.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Smith UM, et al. The transmembrane protein meckelin (MKS3) is mutated in Meckel-Gruber syndrome and the wpk rat. Nat Genet. 2006;38:191–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kyttala M, et al. MKS1, encoding a component of the flagellar apparatus basal body proteome, is mutated in Meckel syndrome. Nat Genet. 2006;38:155–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kim J, Krishnaswami SR, Gleeson JG. CEP290 interacts with the centriolar satellite component PCM-1 and is required for Rab8 localization to the primary cilium. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:3796–805.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Valente EM, et al. Mutations in TMEM216 perturb ciliogenesis and cause Joubert, Meckel and related syndromes. Nat Genet. 2010;42:619–25.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.594.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gorden NT, et al. CC2D2A is mutated in Joubert syndrome and interacts with the ciliopathy-associated basal body protein CEP290. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:559–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.10.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hogue J, et al. Homozygosity for a FBN1 missense mutation causes a severe Marfan syndrome phenotype. Clin Genet. 2013;84:392–3.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12073.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Koenigstein K, et al. Chudley-McCullough syndrome: variable clinical picture in twins with a novel GPSM2 mutation. Neuropediatrics. 2016;47:197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Caron C, et al. CdGAP/ARHGAP31, a Cdc42/Rac1 GTPase regulator, is critical for vascular development and VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27485.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Simpson MA, et al. Mutations in NOTCH2 cause Hajdu-Cheney syndrome, a disorder of severe and progressive bone loss. Nat Genet. 2011;43:303–5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.779.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kibar Z, et al. Contribution of VANGL2 mutations to isolated neural tube defects. Clin Genet. 2011;80:76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Seo JH, et al. Mutations in the planar cell polarity gene, Fuzzy, are associated with neural tube defects in humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:4324–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wang M, et al. Role of the planar cell polarity gene Protein tyrosine kinase 7 in neural tube defects in humans. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015;103:1021–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Pappa L, et al. Exome analysis in an Estonian multiplex family with neural tube defects-a case report. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017;33:1575–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3491-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Allache R, De Marco P, Merello E, Capra V, Kibar Z. Role of the planar cell polarity gene CELSR1 in neural tube defects and caudal agenesis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94:176–81.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Yoon G, Rosenberg J, Blaser S, Rauen KA. Neurological complications of cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:894–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Gripp KW, Hopkins E, Doyle D, Dobyns WB. High incidence of progressive postnatal cerebellar enlargement in Costello syndrome: brain overgrowth associated with HRAS mutations as the likely cause of structural brain and spinal cord abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A:1161–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33391.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Dincer A, Yener U, Ozek MM. Hydrocephalus in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: MR imaging findings and the outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:643–6.  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Rauen KA. The RASopathies. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14:355–69.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153523.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Tos T, Alp MY, Aksoy A, Ceylaner S, Hanauer A. A familial case of Coffin-Lowry syndrome caused by RPS6KA3 C.898C>T mutation associated with multiple abnormal brain imaging findings. Genet Couns. 2015;26:47–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Rijken BF, Lequin MH, Van Veelen ML, de Rooi J, Mathijssen IM. The formation of the foramen magnum and its role in developing ventriculomegaly and Chiari I malformation in children with craniosynostosis syndromes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:1042–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Chen CP, et al. Rapid detection of K650E mutation in FGFR3 using uncultured amniocytes in a pregnancy affected with fetal cloverleaf skull, occipital pseudoencephalocele, ventriculomegaly, straight short femurs, and thanatophoric dysplasia type II. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;52:420–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2013.05.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Matsumoto A, et al. The presence of diminished white matter and corpus callosal thinning in a case with a SOX9 mutation. Brain and Development. 2017;40:325–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2017.09.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Lausch E, et al. TBX15 mutations cause craniofacial dysmorphism, hypoplasia of scapula and pelvis, and short stature in Cousin syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:649–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.10.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Papangeli I, Scambler P. The 22q11 deletion: DiGeorge and velocardiofacial syndromes and the role of TBX1. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2013;2:393–403.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Van Laer L, Dietz H, Loeys B. Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;802:95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Riviere JB, et al. De novo germline and postzygotic mutations in AKT3, PIK3R2 and PIK3CA cause a spectrum of related megalencephaly syndromes. Nat Genet. 2012;44:934–40.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Mirzaa G, et al. De novo CCND2 mutations leading to stabilization of cyclin D2 cause megalencephaly-polymicrogyria-polydactyly-hydrocephalus syndrome. Nat Genet. 2014;46:510–5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2948.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Capo-Chichi JM, et al. Disruption of TBC1D7, a subunit of the TSC1-TSC2 protein complex, in intellectual disability and megalencephaly. J Med Genet. 2013;50:740–4.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ohata S, et al. Mechanosensory genes Pkd1 and Pkd2 contribute to the planar polarization of brain ventricular epithelium. J Neurosci. 2015;35:11153–68.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0686-15.2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ibanez-Tallon I, et al. Dysfunction of axonemal dynein heavy chain Mdnah5 inhibits ependymal flow and reveals a novel mechanism for hydrocephalus formation. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:2133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Banizs B, et al. Dysfunctional cilia lead to altered ependyma and choroid plexus function, and result in the formation of hydrocephalus. Development. 2005;132:5329–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wallmeier J, et al. Mutations in CCNO result in congenital mucociliary clearance disorder with reduced generation of multiple motile cilia. Nat Genet. 2014;46:646–51.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2961.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Nunez-Olle M, et al. Constitutive Cyclin O deficiency results in penetrant hydrocephalus, impaired growth and infertility. Oncotarget. 2017;8:99261–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Yamamoto H, et al. Genetic deletion of afadin causes hydrocephalus by destruction of adherens junctions in radial glial and ependymal cells in the midbrain. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80356.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kim YH, et al. A complex of BBS1 and NPHP7 is required for cilia motility in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72549.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Cha JY, et al. The role of FoxC1 in early Xenopus development. Dev Dyn. 2007;236:2731–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Shibutani M, et al. Arid1b Haploinsufficiency causes abnormal brain gene expression and autism-related behaviors in mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18091872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Veleri S, et al. Knockdown of Bardet-Biedl syndrome gene BBS9/PTHB1 leads to cilia defects. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34389.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034389.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Hagenlocher C, Walentek P, Muller C, Thumberger T, Feistel K. Ciliogenesis and cerebrospinal fluid flow in the developing Xenopus brain are regulated by foxj1. Cilia. 2013;2:e1–e14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-2530-2-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Mori N, et al. Ccdc85c encoding a protein at apical junctions of radial glia is disrupted in hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (hhy) mice. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:314–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.09.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Liu J, et al. A betaPix Pak2a signaling pathway regulates cerebral vascular stability in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:13990–5.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700825104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Muntean BS, Jin X, Williams FE, Nauli SM. Primary cilium regulates CaV1.2 expression through Wnt signaling. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229:1926–34.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.24642.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Cardenas-Rodriguez M, et al. Characterization of CCDC28B reveals its role in ciliogenesis and provides insight to understand its modifier effect on Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Hum Genet. 2013;132:91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rachel RA, et al. CEP290 alleles in mice disrupt tissue-specific cilia biogenesis and recapitulate features of syndromic ciliopathies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:3775–91.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddv123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Lyons PJ, Sapio MR, Fricker LD. Zebrafish cytosolic carboxypeptidases 1 and 5 are essential for embryonic development. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:30454–62.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.497933.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Ying G, et al. Centrin 2 is required for mouse olfactory ciliary trafficking and development of ependymal cilia planar polarity. J Neurosci. 2014;34:6377–88.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0067-14.2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Ha S, Lindsay AM, Timms AE, Beier DR. Mutations in Dnaaf1 and Lrrc48 cause hydrocephalus, laterality defects, and sinusitis in mice. G3 (Bethesda). 2016;6:2479–87.  https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.030791.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Mo D, et al. Apical targeting and endocytosis of the sialomucin endolyn are essential for establishment of zebrafish pronephric kidney function. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:5546–54.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.111468.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Oji A, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing in ES cells and its application for chimeric analysis in mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31666.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31666.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Clement A, Solnica-Krezel L, Gould KL. Functional redundancy between Cdc14 phosphatases in zebrafish ciliogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2012;241:1911–21.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.23876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Zega K, et al. Dusp16 deficiency causes congenital obstructive hydrocephalus and brain overgrowth by expansion of the neural progenitor pool. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:372.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00372.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Shaheen R, et al. A founder CEP120 mutation in Jeune asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy expands the role of centriolar proteins in skeletal ciliopathies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:1410–9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Swetloff A, Ferretti P. Changes in E2F5 intracellular localization in mouse and human choroid epithelium and developmet. Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49:859–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Li X, et al. Concomitant activation of foxo3a and fancc or fancd2 reveals a two-tier protection from oxidative stress-induced hydrocephalus. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21:1675–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Schueler M, et al. DCDC2 mutations cause a renal-hepatic ciliopathy by disrupting Wnt signaling. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96:81–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.12.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Wang L, et al. Impaired methylation modifications of FZD3 alter chromatin accessibility and are involved in congenital hydrocephalus pathogenesis. Brain Res. 2014;1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Mitchison HM, et al. Mutations in axonemal dynein assembly factor DNAAF3 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Nat Genet. 2012;44(381–389):S381–2.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Davy BE, Robinson ML. Congenital hydrocephalus in hy3 mice is caused by a frameshift mutation in Hydin, a large novel gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:1163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Chandrasekar G, Vesterlund L, Hultenby K, Tapia-Paez I, Kere J. The zebrafish orthologue of the dyslexia candidate gene DYX1C1 is essential for cilia growth and function. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63123.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Moon H, et al. Intestinal cell kinase, a protein associated with endocrine-cerebro-osteodysplasia syndrome, is a key regulator of cilia length and hedgehog signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:8541–6.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323161111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Gonzalez AM, et al. Ecrg4 expression and its product augurin in the choroid plexus- impact on fetal brain development, cerebrospinal fluid homeostasis and neuroprogenitor cell response to CNS injury. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011;8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-8-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Bardella C, et al. Expression of Idh1(R132H) in the Murine subventricular zone stem cell niche recapitulates features of early Gliomagenesis. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:578–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.08.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Pathak N, Obara T, Mangos S, Liu Y, Drummond IA. The zebrafish fleer gene encodes an essential regulator of cilia tubulin polyglutamylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:4353–64.  https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Akbay EA, et al. D-2-hydroxyglutarate produced by mutant IDH2 causes cardiomyopathy and neurodegeneration in mice. Genes Dev. 2014;28:479–90.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.231233.113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Manzini MC, et al. Exome sequencing and functional validation in zebrafish identify GTDC2 mutations as a cause of Walker-Warburg syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91:541–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.07.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Muniz-Talavera H, Schmidt JV. The mouse Jhy gene regulates ependymal cell differentiation and ciliogenesis. PLoS One. 2017;12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Lee MS, et al. IFT46 plays an essential role in cilia development. Dev Biol. 2015;400:248–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.02.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Cesca F, et al. Kidins220/ARMS is an essential modulator of cardiovascular and nervous system development. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e226.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2011.108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Shen H, Bocksteins E, Kondrychyn I, Snyders D, Korzh V. Functional antagonism of voltage-gated K+ channel alpha-subunits in the developing brain ventricular system. Development. 2016;143:4249–60.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.140467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Tong CK, et al. Primary cilia are required in a unique subpopulation of neural progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:12438–43.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321425111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Gueneau L, et al. KIAA1109 variants are associated with a severe disorder of brain development and arthrogryposis. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102:116–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Yamazaki F, et al. The Lhx9 homeobox gene controls pineal gland development and prevents postnatal hydrocephalus. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220:1497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Teng Y, et al. Loss of zebrafish lgi1b leads to hydrocephalus and sensitization to pentylenetetrazol induced seizure-like behavior. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24596.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024596.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Hanington PC, et al. Analysis of leukemia inhibitory factor and leukemia inhibitory factor receptor in embryonic and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dev Biol. 2008;314:250–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.10.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Inaba Y, et al. Transport of the outer dynein arm complex to cilia requires a cytoplasmic protein Lrrc6. Genes Cells. 2016;21:728–39.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Chen HL, Yuh CH, Wu KK. Nestin is essential for zebrafish brain and eye development through control of progenitor cell apoptosis. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9318.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Ridge LA, et al. Non-muscle myosin IIB (Myh10) is required for epicardial function and coronary vessel formation during mammalian development. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1007068.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007068.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Zhou W, Dai J, Attanasio M, Hildebrandt F. Nephrocystin-3 is required for ciliary function in zebrafish embryos. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2010;299:F55–62.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00043.2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Jain N, et al. Conditional N-WASP knockout in mouse brain implicates actin cytoskeleton regulation in hydrocephalus pathology. Exp Neurol. 2014;254:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Vogel P, et al. Congenital hydrocephalus in genetically engineered mice. Vet Pathol. 2012;49:166–81.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985811415708.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Ferrante MI, et al. Convergent extension movements and ciliary function are mediated by ofd1, a zebrafish orthologue of the human oral-facial-digital type 1 syndrome gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:289–303.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Raveau M, et al. Brain ventriculomegaly in down syndrome mice is caused by Pcp4 dose-dependent cilia dysfunction. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:923–31.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Zizioli D, et al. Knock-down of pantothenate kinase 2 severely affects the development of the nervous and vascular system in zebrafish, providing new insights into PKAN disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;85:35–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2015.10.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Wodarczyk C, et al. A novel mouse model reveals that polycystin-1 deficiency in ependyma and choroid plexus results in dysfunctional cilia and hydrocephalus. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7137.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Mangos S, et al. The ADPKD genes pkd1a/b and pkd2 regulate extracellular matrix formation. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3:354–65.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.003194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Fant ME, Fuentes J, Kong X, Jackman S. The nexus of prematurity, birth defects, and intrauterine growth restriction: a role for plac1-regulated pathways. Front Pediatr. 2014;2:8.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Obara T, et al. Polycystin-2 immunolocalization and function in zebrafish. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2706–18.  https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006040412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Murga M, et al. POLD3 is Haploinsufficient for DNA replication in mice. Mol Cell. 2016;63:877–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Nornes S, et al. Interference with splicing of Presenilin transcripts has potent dominant negative effects on Presenilin activity. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:402–12.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddm317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Shimada IS, Acar M, Burgess RJ, Zhao Z, Morrison SJ. Prdm16 is required for the maintenance of neural stem cells in the postnatal forebrain and their differentiation into ependymal cells. Genes Dev. 2017;31:1134–46.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.291773.116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Grimes DT, Boswell CW, Morante NF, Henkelman RM, Ciruna B. Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature. Science. 2016;352:1341–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Roset R, et al. The Rad50 hook domain regulates DNA damage signaling and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2014;28:451–62.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.236745.113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Shi Y, Obert E, Rahman B, Rohrer B, Lobo GP. The retinol binding protein receptor 2 (Rbpr2) is required for photoreceptor outer segment morphogenesis and visual function in Zebrafish. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16207.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16498-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Xu P, et al. Conditional ablation of the RFX4 isoform 1 transcription factor: allele dosage effects on brain phenotype. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0190561.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190561.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Ghosh AK, et al. Human retinopathy-associated ciliary protein retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator mediates cilia-dependent vertebrate development. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:90–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Lin X, et al. Genetic deletion of Rnd3 results in aqueductal stenosis leading to hydrocephalus through upregulation of notch signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:8236–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Dash SN, et al. Sept7b is essential for pronephric function and development of left-right asymmetry in zebrafish embryogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:1476–86.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.138495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Ritter-Makinson SL, et al. Group II metabotropic glutamate receptor interactions with NHERF scaffold proteins: implications for receptor localization in brain. Neuroscience. 2017;353:58–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.060.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Hurd TW, et al. Mutation of the Mg2+ transporter SLC41A1 results in a nephronophthisis-like phenotype. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:967–77.  https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2012101034.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Lee K, et al. Congenital hydrocephalus and abnormal subcommissural organ development in Sox3 transgenic mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29041.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029041.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Treat AC, et al. The PDZ protein Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory Factor-1 (NHERF1) regulates planar cell polarity and motile cilia organization. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153144.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Lehti MS, et al. Cilia-related protein SPEF2 regulates osteoblast differentiation. Sci Rep. 2018;8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19204-5.
  165. 165.
    Brockschmidt A, et al. Neurologic and ocular phenotype in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome and a zebrafish model. Hum Genet. 2011;130:645–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-011-0999-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Nemajerova A, et al. Non-oncogenic roles of TAp73: from multiciliogenesis to metabolism. Cell Death Differ. 2017;25:144–53.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Xu Y, et al. Characterization of tetratricopeptide repeat-containing proteins critical for cilia formation and function. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124378.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124378.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Liu M, et al. Ulk4r is essential for ciliogenesis and CSF flow. J Neurosci. 2016;36:7589–600.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0621-16.2016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Liu M, et al. Ulk4 regulates neural stem cell pool. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2318–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Hirschner W, et al. Biosynthesis of Wdr16, a marker protein for kinocilia-bearing cells, starts at the time of kinocilia formation in rat, and wdr16 gene knockdown causes hydrocephalus in zebrafish. J Neurochem. 2007;101:274–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04500.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Heye N, Dunne JW. Noonan’s syndrome with hydrocephalus, hindbrain herniation, and upper cervical intracord cyst. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;59:338–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Thompson D, et al. RAF1 variants causing biventricular hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in two preterm infants: further phenotypic delineation and review of literature. Clin Dysmorphol. 2017;26:195–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MCD.0000000000000194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Gripp KW, et al. A novel rasopathy caused by recurrent de novo missense mutations in PPP1CB closely resembles Noonan syndrome with loose anagen hair. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170:2237–47.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37781.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Reinker KA, Stevenson DA, Tsung A. Orthopaedic conditions in Ras/MAPK related disorders. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Wilkie AO, et al. Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome. Nat Genet. 1995;9:165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Killer M, et al. Cytokine and growth factor concentration in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with hydrocephalus following endovascular embolization of unruptured aneurysms in comparison with other types of hydrocephalus. Neurochem Res. 2010;35:1652–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-010-0226-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Ohmiya M, et al. Administration of FGF-2 to embryonic mouse brain induces hydrocephalic brain morphology and aberrant differentiation of neurons in the postnatal cerebral cortex. J Neurosci Res. 2001;65:228–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Bristol RE, Lekovic GP, Rekate HL. The effects of craniosynostosis on the brain with respect to intracranial pressure. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2004;11:262–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Unger S, Scherer G, Superti-Furga A. Campomelic dysplasia. In: GeneReviews. Seattle: University of Washington; 2008. p. 1–17. [updated: 2013].Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Cheung M, Briscoe J. Neural crest development is regulated by the transcription factor Sox9. Development. 2003;130:5681–93.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Lee YH, Saint-Jeannet JP. Sox9 function in craniofacial development and disease. Genesis. 2011;49:200–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20717.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Gopakumar H, et al. Acampomelic form of campomelic dysplasia with SOX9 missense mutation. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81:98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Scott CE, et al. SOX9 induces and maintains neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1181–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Mirzaa GM, et al. Association of MTOR mutations with developmental brain disorders, including megalencephaly, focal cortical dysplasia, and pigmentary mosaicism. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:836–45.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Ryskalin L, et al. mTOR-dependent cell proliferation in the brain. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7082696.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7082696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Foerster P, et al. mTORC1 signaling and primary cilia are required for brain ventricle morphogenesis. Development. 2017;144:201–10.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.138271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Godfrey C, et al. Refining genotype phenotype correlations in muscular dystrophies with defective glycosylation of dystroglycan. Brain. 2007;130:2725–35.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    van Reeuwijk J, Brunner HG, van Bokhoven H. Glyc-O-genetics of Walker-Warburg syndrome. Clin Genet. 2005;67:281–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Currier SC, et al. Mutations in POMT1 are found in a minority of patients with Walker-Warburg syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;133A:53–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Satz JS, et al. Brain and eye malformations resembling Walker-Warburg syndrome are recapitulated in mice by dystroglycan deletion in the epiblast. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10567–75.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2457-08.2008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Sironen A, et al. Loss of SPEF2 function in mice results in spermatogenesis defects and primary ciliary dyskinesia. Biol Reprod. 2011;85:690–701.  https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.091132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    May-Simera HL, Kelley MW. Cilia, Wnt signaling, and the cytoskeleton. Cilia. 2012;1:7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-2530-1-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Schrander-Stumpel C, Fryns JP. Congenital hydrocephalus: nosologyand guidelines for clinical approach and genetic counselling. Eur J Pediatr. 1998;157:355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Limbrick DD Jr, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of infantile congenital hydrocephalus. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172353.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charuta Gavankar Furey
    • 1
  • Prince Antwi
    • 1
  • Kristopher Thomas Kahle
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Neurosurgery, Pediatrics, and Cellular and Molecular PhysiologyYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations