Advertisement

Readback Error Classification of Radiotelephony Communication Based on Convolutional Neural Network

  • Fangyuan Cheng
  • Guimin Jia
  • Jinfeng Yang
  • Dan Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10996)

Abstract

The readback errors of radiotelephony communication result in serious potential risk to the air transportation safety. Therefore, it is essential to establish a proper model to identify and also to classify the readback errors automatically so as to improve the flight safety. In this paper, a new scheme, which has two channels to process the instructions and the readbacks (I-R pairs) respectively based on one-layer convolutional neural network (CNN), is proposed for the readback error classification. The semantics of the I-R pairs are learned by the one-layer CNN encoder. Then, the classification decision is made according to a matching vector of the I-R pairs. A new method of input is also tested. Extensive experiments have been conducted and the results show that the proposed scheme is effective for automatic readback error classification and the average classification accuracy on a Chinese civil radiotelephony communication dataset is up to 95.44%.

Keywords

Radiotelephony communication One-layer convolutional neural network Semantic vector  Readback error classification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1433120, No. 61502498, No. 61379102) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3122017001).

References

  1. 1.
    National Transportation Safety Board: Review of U.S. Civil Aviation Accident, Calender Year 2010. Annual Review NTSB/ARA-12/01, Washington, DC (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Billings, C.E., Cheaney, E.D.: Information transfer problems in the aviation system, Technical report 1875, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cardosi, K., Falzarano, P., Han, S.: Pilot-controller communication errors: an analysis of Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) reports. Aviat. Saf. 119, S518–S519 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    US Federal Aviation Administration: Altitude deviation study: a Descriptive Analysis of Pilot and Controller incidents, Final report, October 1992Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morrow, D., Lee, A., Rodvold, M.: Analysis of problems in routine controller-pilot communication. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(4), 285–302 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pope, J.A.: Research identifies common errors behind altitude deviations. Flight Saf. Digest. 12, 1–13 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luan, S.Z., Chen, C., Zhang, B.C., Han, J.G., Liu, J.Z.: Gabor convolutional networks. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27, 4357–4366 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, B.T., Lu, Z.D., Li, H., Chen, Q.C.: Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2042–2050 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qiu, X., Huang, X.: Convolutional neural tensor network architecture for community-based question answering. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1305–1311 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yin, W., Schütze, H.: Convolutional neural network for paraphrase identification. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 901–911 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yin, W., Schütze, H.: MultiGranCNN: an architecture for general matching of text chunks on multiple levels of granularity. In: International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 63–73 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Doha, Qatar, pp. 1746–1751 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, Y., Roller, S., Wallace, B.: MGNC-CNN: a simple approach to exploiting multiple word embeddings for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.00968 (2016)
  14. 14.
    Lu, Y.J.: Semantic Representation and Verification of Aviation Radiotelephony Communication Based on RNN. Civil Aviation University of China (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jia, G.M., Lu, Y.J., Lu, W.B., et al.: Verification method for Chinese aviation radiotelephony readbacks based on LSTM-RNN. Electron. Lett. 53(6), 401–403 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I.: Learning to execute. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.4615 (2014)
  17. 17.
    Liu, Y., Sun, C.J., Lin, L., Wang, X.L.: Learning natural language inference using bidirectional LSTM model and inner-attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.09090 (2016)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fangyuan Cheng
    • 1
  • Guimin Jia
    • 1
  • Jinfeng Yang
    • 1
  • Dan Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Tianjin Key Lab for Advanced Signal ProcessingCivil Aviation University of ChinaTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations