Advertisement

The Origin of Language

  • Felice Cimatti
Chapter
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 18)

Abstract

How does the transition between the proto-semiosic material relation, established between two molecules, and a historical-natural language happen, and what changes does it bring? How much in common do cellular semiosis and human semiosis have? It is necessary to understand how Prodi explains the evolution of semiosis, from its most simple forms to the more complex ones. The problem is how to maintain the continuity of the biological process without underplaying the radical discontinuities it constantly engenders.

Keywords

Evolution Discontinuity Transformation Origin of language 

BibliographyIn ItalianOther Works Cited

  1. Alač, M., & Violi, P. (Eds.). (2004). In the beginning: Origins of semiosis, Semiotic and Cognitive Studies 12. Bologna: Brepols.Google Scholar
  2. Barbieri, M. (1985). La teoria semantica dell’evoluzione. (Thom, René, preface.) (Saggi, Scienze.) Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  3. Barbieri, M. (2001). The organic codes: The birth of semantic biology. (Capire la vita 2.) Ancona: peQuod editore.Google Scholar
  4. Bardini, T. (2017). Relational ontology, Simondon, and the hope for a third culture inside biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 10(1), 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cimatti, F. (2000a). Nel segno del cerchio: L’ontologia semiotica di Giorgio Prodi. Roma: Il manifesto Libri.Google Scholar
  6. Cimatti, F. (2000b). The circular semiosis of Giorgio Prodi. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 351–379.Google Scholar
  7. Cobley, P. (2016). Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics, Biosemiotics 15. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eco, U. (1994). In memory of Giorgio Prodi: A challenge to the myth of two cultures. (Johnston, Marina, trans.) In: Jaworski, L. G (ed.), Lo studio bolognese: campi di studio, di insegnamento, di recerca, di divulgazione (pp. 75–78). Stony Brook: Forum Italicum (Center for Italian Studies, State University of New York at Stony Brook), [Translation of Eco 1988b.]Google Scholar
  9. Favareau, D., Kull, K., Ostdiek, G., Maran, T., Westling, L., Cobley, P., Stjernfelt, F., Anderson, M., Tønnessen, M., & Wheeler, W. (2017). How can the study of the humanities inform the study of biosemiotics? Biosemiotics, 10(1), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kockelman, P. (2013). Agent, person, subject, self: A theory of ontology, interaction, and infrastructure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kull, K. (2018). On the logic of animal umwelten: The animal subjective present and zoosemiotics of choice and learning. In M. Gianfranco & D. Mangano (Eds.), Semiotics of animals in culture: Zoosemiotics 2.0, Biosemiotics 17 (pp. 135–148). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lehman, N., Bernhard, T., Larson, B. C., Robinson, A., & Southgate, C. (2014). Empirical demonstration of environmental sensing in catalytic RNA: evolution of interpretive behavior at the origins of life. BioMed Central Evolutionary Biology, 14, 248.Google Scholar
  14. Merrell, F. (2013). Meaning making: It’s what we do; It’s who we are, Tartu Semiotics Library 12. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nöth, W. (Ed.). (1994). Origins of semiosis: Sign evolution in nature and culture, Approaches to Semiotics 116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Prodi, G. (1974). La preistoria del segno. Lingua e Stile, 9(1), 117–145.Google Scholar
  17. Prodi, G. (1983). Linguistica e biologia. In C. Segre (Ed.), Intorno alla linguistica (pp. 172–202). Milano: Feltrinelli (Discussione su “Linguistica e biologia”, 308–319).Google Scholar
  18. Prodi, G. (1989c). Biology as natural semiotics. In W. A. Koch (Ed.), For a semiotics of emotion, Bochumer Beiträge zur Semiotik; BBS 4 (pp. 93–110). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
  19. Sebeok, T. A., & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (Eds.). (1992). Biosemiotics: Semiotic web 1991, Approaches to Semiotics 106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, W. J. (1965). Message, meaning, and context in ethology. The American Naturalist, 99(908), 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prodi, G. (1983b). Lingua e biologia; Discussione su ‘Linguistica e biologia’. In C. Segre (Ed.), Intorno alla linguistica. Milano: Feltrinelli p. 172–202; p. 308–319.Google Scholar
  22. Prodi, G. (1986). Dove va la semiotica? Quaderni del circolo semiologico siciliano, 24, 121–132.Google Scholar
  23. Prodi, G. (1987b). Gli artifici della ragione. Milano: Edizioni del Sole 24 ore.Google Scholar
  24. Prodi, G. (1988d). Signs and codes in immunology In: Sercarz, E. E., Celada, F, Mitchison, N. A., & Tada, T. (eds.), The semiotics of cellular communication in the immune system (pp. 53–64). [NATO ASI Series, Series H: Cell Biology, vol. 23.] Berlin: Springer-Verlag (reprinted in: Favareau D. (ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary (pp. 323–336). Berlin: Springer 2010).Google Scholar
  25. Prodi, G. (1989a). Culture as natural hermeneutics. In W. Koch (Ed.), The nature of culture. Proceedings of the international and interdisciplinary symposium, October 7—11, 1986 in Bochum (pp. 215–239). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
  26. Aboitiz, F. (Ed.). (2017). A brain for speech. A view from evolutionary neuroanatomy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Antonello, P. (2012). Contro il materialismo. Le “due culture” in Italia: bilancio di un secolo. Torino: Aragno.Google Scholar
  28. Baker, L. (1989). Saving belief. A critique of physicalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Baslow, M. (2011). Biosemiosis and the cellular basis of mind. Biosemiotics, 4(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bekoff, M., & Pierce, J. (2009). Wild justice: The moral lives of animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chieco, B. L. (2011). Giorgio Prodi oncologo. Belfagor, 66(395), 609–612.Google Scholar
  32. D’Angelo, P. (2015). Il problema Croce. Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
  33. Deely, J., Petrilli, S., & Ponzio, A. (2005). The semiotic animal. New York: Legas.Google Scholar
  34. Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  36. Emmeche, C., & Kull, K. (Eds.). (2011). Towards a semiotic biology: Life is the action of signs. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felice Cimatti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Studi UmanisticiUniversità della CalabriaArcavacata di Rende CSItaly

Personalised recommendations