Advertisement

Aesthetic Experience and the Problem of the Sacred

  • Felice Cimatti
Chapter
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 18)

Abstract

The human world is the world of language, i.e. of knowledge. To know means to formulate a hypothesis, to then be either verified or falsified. This also means that the “boundaries” of the world are not fixed but shift with the progress of knowledge. But this also entails that it is knowledge itself that produces the unknown. Prodi calls this movable field of experience, shifting along with the process of knowledge, “darkness” [buio]. The problem of “darkness” is the problem of the internal limits of language. Such “darkness”, indeed, is by definition unrecognizable, since it is an inevitable collateral effect of knowledge. There is no science of “darkness”, but this does not mean that it cannot be thinkable via other means. Aesthetic experience and the experience of the sacred are non-scientific ways to “think” the “darkness”.

Keywords

“Darkness” Hypothesis Limits of knowledge Aesthetic experience Experience of the sacred 

BibliographyIn ItalianOther Works Cited

  1. Alač, M., & Violi, P. (Eds.). (2004). In the beginning: Origins of semiosis, Semiotic and Cognitive Studies 12. Bologna: Brepols.Google Scholar
  2. Barbieri, M. (2001). The organic codes: The birth of semantic biology. (Capire la vita 2.) Ancona: peQuod editore.Google Scholar
  3. Barbieri, M. (Ed.). (2007). Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Cimatti, F. (2000a). Nel segno del cerchio: L’ontologia semiotica di Giorgio Prodi. Roma: Il manifesto Libri.Google Scholar
  5. Cimatti, F. (2000b). The circular semiosis of Giorgio Prodi. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 351–379.Google Scholar
  6. Emmeche, C., & Kull, K. (Eds.). (2011). Towards a Semiotic Biology: Life is the Action of Signs. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation, and prospects. Semiotica, 134(1/4), 61–78.Google Scholar
  8. Sharov, A. (2013). Minimal mind. In L. Swan (Ed.), Origins of mind, Biosemiotics 8 (pp. 343–360). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frege, G. (1984). Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (2000). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. New York: Basis Books.Google Scholar
  11. Gagneux, P., & Varki, A. (2001). Genetic differences between humans and great apes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 18, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felice Cimatti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Studi UmanisticiUniversità della CalabriaArcavacata di Rende CSItaly

Personalised recommendations