Advertisement

The Basis for the Clear and Affordable Responsibilities to Property Rights

  • Shelly Hiller Marguerat
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Environmental Policy and Regulation book series (PSEPR)

Abstract

This chapter gives the basic legal grounds and understanding for the solutions of clear responsibilities to nature as proposed in this book. It shows the citations leading to the inference that the responsibilities are valid for our time as per the recognized main source of the absolute property rights in itself and supported by modern interpreters and other influential texts on property from the past. It also gives the basic philosophical understanding of property limits being; no harm done to others and equality.

References

  1. Ashcraft, Richard. Revolutionary Politics and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Ashcraft, Richard. Locke’s Two Treatises of Government. London: Unwin Hyman, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Bentham, Jeremy. Anarchical Fallacies, Being an Examination of the Declarations of Rights Issued During the French Revolution. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 2 of 11. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxtandstaticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1921andchapter=114226andlayout=htmlandItemid=27.
  4. Christman, John. ‘Locke’s Second Treatise of Government Called ‘of Property.’’ In Two Treatises of Government, edited by Thomas I. Cook. New York: Hafner Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Daston, Lorraine, and Michael Stolleis Daston, eds. Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the ‘Two Treatises of Government.’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, John. Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Forde, Steven. ‘Natural Law, Theology, and Morality in Locke.’ American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 2 (2001): 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forde, Steven. ‘What Does Locke Expect Us to Know?’ The Review of Politics 68, no. 2 (2006): 232–258.Google Scholar
  10. Grotius, Hugo. De jure belli ac pacis libri tres (The law of war and peace). Translated by A. C. Campbell. London: Clarendon Press, 1625. http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm.
  11. Hiller Marguerat, Shelly. ‘John Locke’s Concept of Property and His Natural Law Limits Based on Reason.’ Doctorate thesis. Geneva University Archives Online, Geneva, 2014. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:36849.
  12. Höpfner, Ludwig Julius Friedrich. Naturrecht des einzelnen Menschen, der Gesellschaften und der Völker. 3rd ed. Gießen: Johann Christian Krieger, 1780.Google Scholar
  13. Judge, Rebecca P. ‘Restoring the Commons: Toward a New Interpretation of Locke’s Theory of Property.’ Land Economics 78, no. 3 (2002): 331–338.Google Scholar
  14. Justinian (533 AD). Digest Book. 1932 ed. Translated by S. P. Scott. Cincinnati: The Central Trust Company, 1932. http://www.constitution.org/sps/sps.htm.
  15. Locke, John. Two treatises of government, 1764 ed. London Printed MDCLXXXVIIII, 1690. http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.txt or https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/politics/locke/ch00.htm.
  16. Locke, John. (1693). Some Thoughts Concerning Education. 2001 ed. of reprint 1909–1914. New York: P.F. Collier and Son, 2001. http://www.bartleby.com/37/1/3.html.
  17. Macpherson, Crawford Brough. ‘Locke on Capitalist Appropriation.’ The Western Political Quarterly 4, no. 4 (1951): 550–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mill, J. S. ‘Remarks on Bentham’s Philosophy. Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society.’ In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 10. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1833. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxtandstaticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=241andchapter=21491andlayout=htmlandItemid=27.
  19. Pitkin, Hanna. ‘Obligation and Consent—I.’ American Political Science Review 60, no. 1 (1966): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pufendorf, Samuel. The Law of Nature and of Nations. 5th ed. Edited by J. Barbeyrac. Translated by B. Kennett. London, 1749.Google Scholar
  21. Reeve, Andrew. Property. Houndmills: Macmillan and Co., 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rousseau, Jean Jacques. What Is the Origin of Inequality Among Men, and It Is Authorized by Natural Law. Translated by G. D. H. Cole. 1754. http://www.constitution.org/jjr/ineq_02.htm.
  23. Shapiro, Ian. The Evolution of Rights in Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. Simmons, A. John. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  25. Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  26. Vattel, Emeric. Le loisir philosophique ou pièces diverses de philosophie, de morale et d’amusement. Geneva: G. C. Walther Press, 1747.Google Scholar
  27. Von Leyden, Wolfgang. ‘John Locke and Natural Law.’ Philosophy 31, no. 116 (1956): 23–35.Google Scholar
  28. Waldron, Jeremy. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelly Hiller Marguerat
    • 1
  1. 1.Forel (Lavaux)Switzerland

Personalised recommendations