Advertisement

The International Human Right to a Healthy Environment, Human Right Obligations for Nature and Possible Difficulties of Implementations

  • Shelly Hiller Marguerat
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Environmental Policy and Regulation book series (PSEPR)

Abstract

This chapter will show the human right to a healthy environment and the international judicial development as to the need for formal recognition of clearer responsibilities while demonstrating case law that supports its indirect recognition in international law under Art. 8 of the ECHR and Art. 1(1) related to court’s rulings in favour of environmental protection measures and at the cost of limiting private property rights, also shown via the Inter-American Commission on human rights. The chapter will also show possible complications in the implications of environmental legislation with regard to property rights and other current propositions for social individual property rights related to the environment while giving the reader the basis on natural law principles, its historical background and use until today.

References

  1. Abbas, Kashif. ‘The Development of the Right to a Healthy Environment Through the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.’ Master Thesis, University of Oslo Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, 2013. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/38688/501.pdf?sequence=7.
  2. Aquinas, Thomas. (1265–1274). Summa Theologica. Translated 1917 ed.: Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns, Oates and Washbourne Ltd., 1917. http://archive.org/stream/thesummatheologi02thomuoft#page/n11/mode/2up.
  3. Banner, S. ‘Arbitral Law and Social Order.’ In Return to Reason, edited by Stephen Toulmin. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  4. Bayne, David C. ‘The Natural Law for Lawyers—A Primer.’ De Paul Law Review 5, no. 2 (1956): 159–208.Google Scholar
  5. Beutel, Frederick K. ‘Relationship of Natural Law to Experimental Jurisprudence.’ Ohio State Law Journal 13, no. 167 (1952): 167–169.Google Scholar
  6. Bodenheimer, Edgar. ‘Significant Developments in German Legal Philosophy Since 1945.’ American Journal of Comparative Law 3, no. 3 (1954): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bracton, Henry. Of the Laws and Customs of England. Vol. 2. London: Butterworths, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, David K. ‘The Nation’s Safeguard.’ In Proceedings of the New York Bar Association, Vol. 16. New York: Stumpf and Steurer, 1893.Google Scholar
  9. Brierly, James Leslie. The Law of Nations. 4th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, Brendan F. ‘Jurisprudential Aims of Church Law Schools in the United States, A Survey.’ Notre Dame Law Lawyer 13, no. 163 (1938): 89.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, Brendan F. ‘Natural Law and the Law-Making Function in American Jurisprudence.’ Notre Dame Law Lawyer 15, no. 9 (1939): 9–25.Google Scholar
  12. Brown 1951, ‘Human Rights and the State’, 17 Vital Speeches, 536–537, taken from: Stanford Law Review 1957, 505.Google Scholar
  13. Burke, E. M. ‘The Lawyers: The Practical Application of the Lectures on the Law and Civil Law. The Natural Law and the Legal Profession, Lectures Delivered Under the Auspices of the Catholic Lawyers’ Guide of Chicago in the Headquarters of the Chicago Bar Association. Chicago: Catholic Lawyers Guild of Chicago, 1949.Google Scholar
  14. Burlamaqui, Jean-Jacques. Principes du droit de la nature et des gens. Geneva: Barrillot and Fils, 1747.Google Scholar
  15. Burns, Anthony. ‘Aquinas’s Two Doctrines of Natural Law.’ Political Studies Association 48, no. 5 (2000): 929–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carson Rachel. Silent Spring. 40th Anniversary ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1962.Google Scholar
  17. Chroust, Anton-Hermann. ‘The Philosophy of Law from St. Augustine to St. Thomas Aquinas.’ The New Scholasticism 20, no. 1 (1946): 26–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chroust, Anton-Hermann. ‘St. Augustine’s Philosophical Theory of Law.’ Notre Dame Lawyer 25, no. 2 (1950): 285–315.Google Scholar
  19. CIEL. ‘States Must Recognize Human Right to a Healthy Environment, Says UN Expert.’ March 6, 2018. http://www.ciel.org/news/states-must-recognize-human-right-healthy-environment-says-un-expert/.
  20. Cochrane, Charles Norris. Christianity and Classical Culture: A Study of Thought and Action from Augustus to Augustine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  21. Coke, Sir Edward. The Selected Writings and Speeches of Sir Edward Coke in Three Volumes. Edited by Steve Sheppard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. Corbin, Henry. History of Islamic Philosophy. Translated by Liadain Sherrard and Philip Sherrard. London: Kegan Paul International, 1957.Google Scholar
  23. Coyle, Sean, and Karen Morrow. The Philosophical Foundation of Environmental Law, Property Rights and Nature. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
  24. Daston, Lorraine, and Michael Stolleis Daston, eds. Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. Demsetz, Harold. ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights.’ American Economic Review 57, no. 2 (1967): 347–359.Google Scholar
  26. D’Entrèves, Alessandro Passarin. Natural Law. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1951.Google Scholar
  27. Dietze, Gottfried. ‘Natural Law in the Modern European Constitutions.’ Natural Law Forum 1, no. 1 (1956): 73–91.Google Scholar
  28. Dietze, Gottfried. ‘Judicial Review in Europe.’ Michigan Law Review 55, no. 4 (1957): 539–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doe, Norman. Fundamental Authority in Late Medieval English Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. Donald, J. A. ‘Natural Law and Natural Rights.’ 2011. http://jim.com/rights.html.
  31. Doyle, James. ‘Socrates and Gorgias.’ Phronesis (Wisdom) 55, no. 1 (2010): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Epstein, Richard A. ‘The Allocation of the Commons: Parking on Public Roads.’ The Journal of Legal Studies 31, no. S2 (2002): S515–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Feeney, Bernard J. ‘Do American Catholic Law Schools Have a Distinctive Philosophy of Education?’ Notre Dame Lawyer 25, no. 646 (1950): 1–5.Google Scholar
  34. Fisher, Elizabeth, Bettina Lange, and Eloise Scotford. Environmental Law, Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  35. Fitzpatrick, Bernard H. ‘Morality of Right-to-Work Laws: Additional Comments.’ Catholic Lawyer 2 (1956): 308–319.Google Scholar
  36. Fortescue, John. De laudibus legum anglie. Edited and Translated by S. B. Chrimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  37. Frank, Jerome. Law and the Modern Mind. London: Stevens and Son, 1949.Google Scholar
  38. Fuller, Lon L. ‘Williston on Contracts.’ North Carolina Law Review 18, no. 1 (1939): 1–15.Google Scholar
  39. Fuller, Lon L. ‘American Legal Philosophy at Mid-Century.’ Journal of Legal Education 6, no. 457 (1954): 457–661.Google Scholar
  40. Gest, John. ‘Eugenic Sterilization: Justice Holmes vs. Natural law.’ Temple Law Quarterly 23 (1950): 306.Google Scholar
  41. Haines, Charles G. ‘The Law of Nature in State and Federal Judicial Decisions.’ The Yale Law Journal 25, no. 8 (1916): 617–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Handl, Günther. ‘Introductory Note on the Stockholm and Rio Declaration.’ 1992. http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/dunche/dunche.html.
  43. Hazeltine, Harold Dexter. ‘General Preface: The Age of Littleton and Fortescue.’ In De laudibus legum anglie, edited by Sir John Fortescue and translated by S. B. Chrimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  44. Hilson, Chris. ‘Greening Citizenship: Boundaries of Membership and the Environment.’ Journal of Environmental Law 13, no. 3 (2001): 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Howland, Jacob. The Republic: The Odyssey of Philosophy. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books, 1993.Google Scholar
  46. Humphreys, Stephen, ed. ‘Human Rights and Climate Change.’ Special Issue, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 38, no. 3 (2009).Google Scholar
  47. Hutcheson, Joseph C. ‘The Natural Law and the Right to Property.’ U Notre Dame Natural Law Institute Lawyer 4, no. 26 (1950): 640–648.Google Scholar
  48. Jefferson, Thomas. To J. Madison, the Writings. 1900 ed. 2 Vols. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Son, 1826. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxtandstaticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1934andchapter=118614andlayout=htmlandItemid=27.
  49. Knox, John. ‘Report of the Independent Expert on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment.’ Preliminary Report. 2012.Google Scholar
  50. Kunz, Josef L. ‘Natural-Law Thinking in the Modern Science of International Law.’ The American Journal of International Law 55, no. 4 (1961): 951–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Layard, Antonia. ‘Law and Localism: The Case of Multiple Occupancy Housing.’ Legal Studies 32, no. 4 (2012): 551–576.Google Scholar
  52. Layard, Antonia, and Jane Holder. ‘Seeking Spatial and Environmental Justice for People and Places Within the European Union.’ In Law and Ecology: New Environmental Foundations, edited by Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
  53. Le Bel, Maurice. ‘Natural Law in the Greek Period.’ In Natural Law Institute Proceedings. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1949.Google Scholar
  54. Lenaerts, Koen, and Kriestien Vanvoorden. ‘The Right to Property in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.’ In Propriété et droits de l’homme. Property and Human Rights, edited by Hugo Vandenberghe. Bruges: La Charte, 2006.Google Scholar
  55. Levy, Ernst. ‘Natural Law in the Roman Period.’ In Natural Law Institute Proceedings. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1949.Google Scholar
  56. Lewis, John Underwood. ‘Sir Edward Coke (1552–1634): His Theory of “Artificial Reason” as a Context for Modern Basic Legal Theory.’ In Law, Liberty, and Parliament: Selected Essays on the Writings of Sir Edward Coke, edited by A. D. Boyer. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004.Google Scholar
  57. Locke, John. Two treatises of government, 1764 ed. London Printed MDCLXXXVIIII, 1690. http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.txt and https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/politics/locke/ch00.htm.
  58. McIlwain, Charles Howard. The Growth of Political Thought in the West: From the Greeks to the End of the Middle Ages. New York: Macmillan and Co., 1932.Google Scholar
  59. McIlwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern. New York: Great Seal Books, 1947.Google Scholar
  60. McInerney-Lankford, Siobhan, Mac Darrow, and Lavanya Rajamani. Human Rights and Climate Change. A Review of the International Legal Dimensions. A World Bank Study. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Muddiman, Joseph George. Trial of King Charles the First. Edinburgh: William Hodge and Company, 1928.Google Scholar
  62. Novak, David. Natural Law and Judaism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  63. Osofsky, Hari M. ‘Multi-Dimensional Governance and the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.’ Florida Law Review 63, no. 5 (2011): 1077–1137.Google Scholar
  64. Pedersen, Ole W. ‘Pedersen, European Environmental Human Rights and Environmental Rights: A Long Time Coming?’ Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 21 (2008): 73–111.Google Scholar
  65. Perrez, Franz Xaver. ‘The World Summit on Sustainable Development: Environment, Precaution and Trade—A Potential for Success and/or Failure.’ Review of European and International Environmental Law 12, no. 1 (2003): 12–22.Google Scholar
  66. Pound, Nathan Roscoe. ‘The End of Law as Developed in Juristic Thought.’ Harvard Law Review 27, no. 7 (1914): 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Quirico, Ottavio, and Mouroud Boumghar, eds. ‘Climate Change and Human Rights: An International and Comparative Law Perspective.’ Special Issue, Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 34, no. 3 (2016).Google Scholar
  68. Rajamani, Lavanya. ‘The Increasing Currency and Relevance of Rights-Based Perspectives in the International Negotiations on Climate Change.’ Journal of Environmental Law 22, no. 3 (2010): 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reid, John Philip. In a Defiant Stance: The Conditions of Law in Massachusetts Bay, the Irish Comparison, and the Coming of the American Revolution. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  70. Rommen, H. A. The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy. 1998 ed. Translated by T. R. Hanley. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1936.Google Scholar
  71. Sandoz, Ellis. ‘Editor’s Introduction.’ In The Roots of Liberty: Magna Carta, Ancient Constitution, and the Anglo-American Tradition of Rule of Law, edited by Ellis Sandoz. Columbia, University of Missouri Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  72. Savaresi, Annalisa. Climate Change and Human Rights: Fragmentation, Interplay and Institutional Linkages. Edited by Sébastien Duyck, Sebastien Jodoin, and Alyssa Johl. London: Routledge, 2018. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2902662.
  73. Schulz, Fritz. Principles of Roman Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  74. Schwartz, Bernard. ‘Administrative Procedure and Natural Law.’ Notre Dame Lawyer 28, no. 2 (1953): 169–198.Google Scholar
  75. Silving, Helen. ‘The Twilight Zone of Positive and Natural Law.’ California Law Review 43, no. 3 (1955): 477–513. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stanford Law Review, ‘Natural Law for Today’s Lawyer.’ Stanford Law Review 9, no. 3: 455–514, 1957 (Cited as S.L.R. (1957), followed by page number).Google Scholar
  77. Stone, Julius. Legal Controls of International Conflicts. New York: Rinehart and Co., 1954.Google Scholar
  78. Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  79. The Committee on State and Federal Taxation (1948), Section of Real Property, Probate and Trust Law of the American Bar Association Issued Report (1949), The Moral Issue, 27 Taxes 9.Google Scholar
  80. Thorne, Samuel E. ‘Translator’s Introduction.’ In Of the Laws and Customs of England, translated by Henry de Bracton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  81. Vattel, Emeric. Le loisir philosophique ou pièces diverses de philosophie, de morale et d’amusement. Geneva: G.C. Walther Press, 1747.Google Scholar
  82. Watts, Jonathan. ‘UN Moves Towards Recognising Human Right to a Healthy Environment.’ The Guardian. March 9, 2018. Last Modified March 27, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/09/un-moves-towards-recognising-human-right-to-a-healthy-environment.
  83. Wild, John. Plato’s Modern Enemies and the Theory of Natural Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  84. Wormuth, Francis D. ‘Aristotle on Law.’ In Essays in Political Theory, edited by Milton R. Konvitz and Arthur E. Murphy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Legal References

  1. Case of Community of San Mateo de Huanchor and it’s members v Peru (2004), Case 504/03, Report No. 69/04, Inter-Am. C.H.R., OEA/Ser.L/V/II.122 Doc. 5 rev 1 at 487.Google Scholar
  2. Austrian General Civil Code 1812.Google Scholar
  3. Case of Fadeyeva v Russia, no. 55723/00, Strasbourg, 9 June 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Case of Fredin v Sweden, Judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A, no. 192.Google Scholar
  5. Case of Guerra and Others v Italy, no.14967/89 Strasbourg, 19 February 1998 (Grand Chamber Judgement).Google Scholar
  6. Case of Hamer v Belgium, Judgment of 27th of November 2007, ECHR application No. 21861/03.Google Scholar
  7. Case of Hatton v The United Kingdom, 34 EHRR 1, References: Times 10-Jul-2003, 36022/97, [2003] 37 EHRR 611, [2003] 37 EHRR 28, (Grand Chamber Judgement) Strasbourg, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. Case of Jacobsson v Sweden (1989), 12 EHRR 56.Google Scholar
  9. Case of James and Others v the United Kingdom (ECtHR) no. 8793/79 (1986) 8 EHRR 123, [1986] ECHR 2, Series A no. 98, [1986] RVR 139 (1986) 8 EHRR 123123 Series A no. 98-B.Google Scholar
  10. Case of Kyrtatos v Greece, no. 41666/9822, Strasbourg, 22, May 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Case of Lithgow v United Kingdom (1986), 8 EHRR 239.Google Scholar
  12. Case of López Ostra v Spain, Application no. 16798/90; ECtHR, 9 December 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Case of Moreno Gómez v Spain, no. 4143/02. Strasbourg, 16 November 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Case of Monsanto v Tilly (1999), EWCA Civ 3044.Google Scholar
  15. Case of Oerlemans v Netherlands (ECHR), Judgment of 27 November 1991, 15 EHRR 561, Series A, no. 219.Google Scholar
  16. Case of Netherlands v. Urgenda, The Hague Court of Appeal, Civil-law Division, Case number: 200.178.245/01, Case list number: C/09/456689/ HA ZA 13-1396, Ruling of 9 October 2018.Google Scholar
  17. Case of Pine Valley Development Ltd and Others v Ireland (1991), 14, EHRR, 319. Judgment of the 29th November 1991.Google Scholar
  18. Case of Sporrong and Lonnroth v Sweden (ECtHR), 5 EHRR 35, 7152/75, 7151/75, [1984] ECHR 18, [23 Sep 1982] ECHR, Series A no. 52, 5, 18 Dec 1984.Google Scholar
  19. Case of Taşkin and Others v Turkey, no. 46117/99, Strasbourg, 10 November 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Case of Trailer and Marina (Leven) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2004) EWCA Civ1580, (2005) 1WLR 1267 (Neuberger LJ).Google Scholar
  21. Case of Turgar and Others v Turkey, Judgment of 8th of July 2008, ECHR application No. 1411 /03.Google Scholar
  22. Children’s Hospital v Adkins (1922), D.C. Cir.Google Scholar
  23. Dennis v United States (1951), 341 U.S.Google Scholar
  24. Fisher and Another v English Nature Admn (2004), [2003] EWHC 1599 (Admin), Times 15-Sep-03, [2004] 1 WLR 503.Google Scholar
  25. Hayes v Crutcher (1952), 108 F.Supp. 582.Google Scholar
  26. Hunter v Canary Wharf (1997), AC 655, HL.Google Scholar
  27. Judgment of Bundesgerichtshof (December 19, 1952), 3 Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofes in Strafsachen 358.Google Scholar
  28. Kropp v Shepsky (1953), 305 N.Y. 113, 465, 468.Google Scholar
  29. Leith v Horgan (1953), 13 N.J.Google Scholar
  30. Liselotte Hauer v Land Rheinland-Pfalz (1979), C. 44/79, C.J.U.E.Google Scholar
  31. Localism Act UK, November 15, 2011.Google Scholar
  32. Plessy v Ferguson (1896), 163 U.S. 537.Google Scholar
  33. Portnoy v Strasser (1952), 303 N.Y.Google Scholar
  34. R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2003) 2 AC 295…226; (2001) UKHL 23; (2001) 2 WLR 1389…298, 655, 802, 806.Google Scholar
  35. Seidenberg v Seidenberg (D.D.C. 1954).Google Scholar
  36. Soderno v Soderno (Sup. Ct. 1945), 56 N.Y.S. 2d.Google Scholar
  37. The Queen v Secretary of State for the Environment and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Council Directive 91/676/EEC. 1999.Google Scholar
  38. The West River Bridge Company v Joseph Dix (1848), 47 U.S.Google Scholar
  39. UNGA Resolution 2398 (XXII) (1968).Google Scholar
  40. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘Analytical Study on the Relationship Between Human Rights and the Environment.’ Report: A/HRC/19/34. December 16, 2011.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson v First County Trust (No. 2) (2004) 1 AC 816 (68)–(70).Google Scholar
  42. World Summit on Sustainable Development: Johannesburg Plan of Implementation. 2002. http://www.johannesburgsummit.org.
  43. Yanomami v Brazil, Case No. 7615, Resolution No. 12/85, Case No. 7615, Within the Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, OAS Doc. OEA SER. L/V/II.66 Doc 10 rev1.24, 5 March 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelly Hiller Marguerat
    • 1
  1. 1.Forel (Lavaux)Switzerland

Personalised recommendations