Advertisement

E-Learning Effectiveness: A Survey in Two Tunisian Higher Education Establishments Using an Educational Platform

  • Rabeb Mbarek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 325)

Abstract

This work seeks to identify the determinants of e-learning effectiveness. We have measured this effectiveness through three individual variables which are motivation, self effectiveness and anxiety towards technology. The objective is to make it possible to the various concerned actors to better understand the factors influencing e-learning effectiveness. Therefore, the research question is formulated as follow: What are the factors contributing to e-learning effectiveness?

The empirical validation of the model has been carried out through a sample of 350 learners registered in two Tunisian establishments. The empirical validation is ensured by factor analyses and structural equations models. Based on these analyses, we could partially validate the effect of motivation, and computer anxiety on the learners’ reaction. Moreover, we were able to check the important effect of motivation on learning.

Keywords

E-learning effectiveness Meta-analysis Self effectiveness Feedback Learning Structural equation 

References

  1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., Berndorff, D.: Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. J. Educ. Psychol. 94, 545–561 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, K., Salas, E., Garofan, C.M.: An integrated model of training evaluation and effectiveness. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 3(4), 385–416 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audet, L.: Regards sur l’évolution de la formation à distance au Canada francophone. Distances et savoirs 9(3), 313–330 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, T.T., Ford, J.K.: Transfer of training: a review and directions for future research. Pers. Psychol. 41(1), 63–105 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A.: Personal and collaborative efficacy in human adaptation and change. Adv. psychol. Sci. 1, 52–71 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. Ben Zammel, I., Chichti, F., Gharbi, J.E.: Comment favoriser le transfert d’apprentissage dans l’organisation par le biais de l’utilisation du e-learning? Réflexion à partir du contexte tunisien, @GRH, vol. 3, no. 20, pp. 81–101 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. Ben Romdhane, E.: La question de l’acceptation des outils de e-learning par les apprenants: quels dimensions et déterminants en milieu universitaire tunisien? Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire 10(1), 45–57 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfmam, S.V.: Facteurs de succès dans la mise en place d’un projet e-learning: une recherche action. In: Conférence de L’AIM, Grenoble (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Brosman, M.J.: The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 14, 223–234 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, S.E.: Computer anxiety and perception of task complexity in learning programming – related skills. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21, 713–728 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chou, H.W.: Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self efficacy. Comput. Hum. Behav. 17, 51–69 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colquitt, J.A., Lepine, J.A.: Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a Meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(5), 678–707 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A.: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19(2), 189–211 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cottier, P., Laneelle, X.: Enseignement et formation en régime numérique: nouveaux rythmes, nouvelles temporalités? Distances et médiations des savoirs 16, 1–26 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. Cybinski, P., Selvanathan, S.: Learning experience and learning effectiveness in undergraduate statistics: modelling performance in traditional and flexible learning environments. Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ. 3(2), 251–271 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Facteau, J.D., Dobbins, G.H., Russell, J.E.A., Ladd, R.T., Kudisch, J.D.: The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pre-training motivation and perceived training transfer. J. Manag. 21, 1–25 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Fenouillet, F., Dero, M.: Le e-learning est il efficace? Une analyse de la literature anglo-saxonnes. Savoirs 12, 87–100 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guillemet, P.: Les étudiants préfèrent Facebook. Distance et médiations des savoirs 6 (2014b).  https://doi.org/10.4000/dms.762
  19. Homan, G., Macpherson, A.: E-learning in the corporate university. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 29(1), 75–90 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houze, E., Meissonier, R.: Performance du e-learning: de l’amélioration des résultats de l’apprenant à la prise en compte des enjeux institutionnels. Systèmes d’Information et Manag. 10(4), 1–26 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. Imamoglu, Z.S.: An empirical analysis concerning the user acceptance of e-learning. J. Am. Acad. Bus. Camb. 11(1), 132–137 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, J.K., Lee, W.K.: The relationship of e-learner’s self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-learning environmental quality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 32–47 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim, H., Lee, S.G., Nam, K.: Validating e-learning affecting training effectiveness. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 27, 22–35 (2007a)Google Scholar
  24. Lim, J., Kim, M., Chen, S.S., Ryder, C.E.: An empirical investigation of student achievement and satisfaction in different learning environments. J. Instr. Psychol. 35(2), 113–119 (2007b)Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, J.P., Becker, T.E.: Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(6), 991–1007 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., Lent, R.W.: Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: a meta-analytic investigation. J. Couns. Psychol. 18, 30–38 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noe, R.A.: Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: neglected influences on training effectiveness. Acad. Manag. Rev. 11(4), 736–749 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noe, R.A., Schmitt, N.: The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: that of a model. Pers. Psychol. 39, 497–523 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noe, R.A., Wilk, S.L.: Investigation of the factors that influence employees’ participation in development activities. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(2), 291–302 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ozer, E.M., Bandura, A.: Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 472–486 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sitzmann, T., Brown, K.G., Caper, W.J., Ely, K., Zimmerma, R.D.: A review and meta – analysis of nomological network of trainee reactions. J. Appl. Psychol. 93(2), 280–295 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tai, W.T.: Effects of training framing, general self-efficacy and training motivation on trainees’ training effectiveness. Pers. Rev. 35(1), 51–65 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tastle, W.J., White, B.A., Shackleton, P.: E-learning in higher education: the challenge, effort, and return on investment. Int. J. E-learn. 4(2), 241–251 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. Wang, Y., Wang, H., Shee, D.Y.: Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: scale development and validation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 1792–1808 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warr, P., Bunce, D.: Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning. Pers. Psychol. 48(2), 347–375 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood, R., Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(3), 361–384 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zimmerman, J.B.: Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 82–91 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rabeb Mbarek
    • 1
  1. 1.NabeulTunisia

Personalised recommendations