Coquetting with Dialectics

  • Robert X. Ware
Part of the Marx, Engels, and Marxisms book series (MAENMA)


Many have attributed a unique and uniquely successful methodology of dialectics to Marx. Others regard dialectics as a disaster of obscurity and confusion, if not meaninglessness. Many now hold that Engels foisted a rigid “formalization” of dialectics on Marx’s work, and yet Marx coquetted with dialectics making positive references here and there. Analytical Marxists have almost universally rejected dialectics in Marxism, turning to clear analyses instead. This chapter, from a perspective of analytical philosophy, begins with an analysis of Marx’s own methodology and then contests some core claims about methodology by analytical Marxists, with primary focus on philosophical questions about methodological individualism and about mechanisms. With a more open understanding, one can see the plausibility for Marx, and Marxists, to coquette with dialectics.


  1. Note: References to the work of Frederick Engels and Karl Marx are from Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, Collected Works. 50 Volumes, 1975–2004. New York, NY: International Publishers. (Referred to in text as “MECW” with volume and page).Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, Jeffrey C., Bernhard Giesen, Richard Münch, and Neil J. Smelser, eds. 1987. The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bottomore, Tom, ed. 1991. A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Carver, Terrell, ed. 1983. Marx & Engels: The Intellectual Relationship. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———, ed. 1991. The Cambridge Companion to Marx. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, Noam. 2016. What Kind of Creatures Are We? New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, G.A. 2001 [1978]. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Expanded ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Published in 1978 by Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Elster, Jon. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1989. Marxism and Individualism. In Knowledge and Politics: Case Studies in the Relationship between Epistemology and Political Philosophy, ed. M. Dascal and O. Gruengard. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, Margaret. 2000. Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Graham, Keith. 1992. Karl Marx Our Contemporary: Social Theory for a Post-Leninist World. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2002. Practical Reasoning in a Social World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvey, David. 2010. A Companion to Marx’s Capital. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Hedström, Peter, and Peter Bearman, eds. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hedström, Peter, and Richard Swedberg, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Levine, Andrew. 2003. A Future for Marxism?: Althusser, the Analytical Turn and the Revival of Socialist Theory. London, UK: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levine, Norman. 2012. Marx’s Discourse with Hegel. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levins, Richard, and Richard Lewontin. 1985. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lukács, Georg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Matthen, Mohan and R. X. Ware, eds. 1994. Biology & Society: Reflections on Methodology. Supplementary Volume 20 of Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, Richard W. 1984. Analyzing Marx: Morality Power and History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ollman, Bertell. 2003. Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx’s Method. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London, UK: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, Tony. 1990. The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1993. Dialectical Social Theory and Its Critics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tollefsen, Deborah Perron. 2015. Groups as Agents. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Tuomela, Raimo. 1995. The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2013. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uchida, Hiroshi. 1988. Marx’s Grundrisse and Hegel’s Logic. Ed. Terrell Carver. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Walker, David M. 2001. Marx, Methodology and Science. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Ware, Robert. 1988. Group Action and Social Ontology. Analyse & Kritik 10 (1): 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2004. Review of Dance of the Dialectic. Philosophy in Review xxiv (4): 281–283.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2014. Collective Responsibility. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, ed. Alex Michalos. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Wilde, Lawrence. 1991. Logic: Dialectic and Contradiction. In The Cambridge Companion to Marx, ed. Terrell Carver, 275–295. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wimsatt, William. 1980. Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy. In Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, ed. T. Nickles. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood, Allen W. 2004. Karl Marx. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright, Erik Olin, Andrew Levine, and Elliott Sober. 1992. Reconstructing Marxism: Essays on Explanation and the Theory of History. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert X. Ware
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations