Advertisement

Introduction

  • Mohammed Dib
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

Contrastive linguistics is a field of linguistics which aims to compare linguistic systems of two or more languages in order to ease the task of teaching, learning and translation processes. It has a lot of concerns with teaching problems and therefore tries to provide problem-solving. It provides teaching programmes, on the one hand, and studies the system of each language (syntactic level, phonetic level, phonological level and morphological level) to help in translation on the other. Contrast can be done at several levels; in the syntactic semantic field, for instance, contrastive linguistics works according to universalities, i.e. to delimit how to realize a universal category in contrasted languages. In phonology, however, it deals with phonological characteristics and shows functions of this latter in languages to be compared, i.e. theoretical contrastive study is an independent study; it does not deal with a particular element that exists in language (A). However, it does deal with how a universal category (x) is realized in language (A) and (B). Contrastive linguistic studies, therefore, do not travel from A to B but rather from X to A and X to B (Dresher 2009, p. 1).

References

  1. Chitoran D (1972) The Romanian English contrastive. In: AILA 3rd Congress, Copenhagen Proceedings, vol 1Google Scholar
  2. Dresher BE (2009) The contrastive hierarchy in phonology, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fisiak J, Mikiewicz A (1981) Contrastive linguistics and the language teacher, 1st edn. Pergamon, Oxford. Reprinted 1985 ISBN 0-08-027230-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. González MÁG, Mackenzie JL, Álvarez EMG (eds) (2008) Current trends in contrastive linguistics functional and cognitive perspectives. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Lado R (1957) Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press ELT, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  6. Lass R (1984) Phonology an introduction to basic concept, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. McGraw-Hill (1966) Trends in language teaching. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Arabic Reference

  1. Hijazi MF (2013) Ilm allugha alarabiya: Madkhal Tarikhi fi Dawii Tutat wa allughat Samiya (The science of Aarabic language: a comparative, historical prelude in the light of patrimony and Semitic languages, 1st edn. Gharib Library)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Dib
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Tlemcen, Laboratory of Automatic Treatment of the Arabic LanguageTlemcenAlgeria

Personalised recommendations