Advertisement

Introduction

  • Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

In a context characterised by increased influxes of migrants in the European Union (EU), little attention has been paid to the EU’s policy on the integration of third country nationals. This book’s introduction formulates the research puzzle that guides subsequent chapters: can there be Europeanization without an EU competence? It starts by clarifying a number of points in order to better frame the puzzle at hand: why integrating, who integrating, how to integrate, who has the competence to integrate and integrating into what are the questions it answers. The introduction then reviews the literature on integration in a multilevel polity and proposes a definition for the concept of soft-Europeanization to be applied throughout this book.

Keywords

Europeanization Soft law Multilevel governance Third country nationals Political community Integration policy 

References

Scholarship and Expert References

  1. Acosta Arcarazo, D. (2014). EU Integration Policy: Between Soft Law and Hard Law (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Desk Research Paper, No. 1).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B., & Blinder, S. (2015). Who Counts as a Migrant? Definitions and Their Consequences. The Migration Observatory. Available at http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/who-counts-as-a-migrant-definitions-and-their-consequences/. Last Consulted November 12, 2016.
  3. Bache, I. (2005). Europeanization and Britain: Towards Multi-level Governance? Paper prepared for the EUSA 9th Biennial Conference in Austin, Texas, March 31–April 2.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, N. (2006). Time-Series–Cross-Section Methods. No. draft as of June 5.Google Scholar
  5. Bercusson, B. (2009). European Labour Law (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börzel, T. A. (2001). Non-compliance in the European Union: Pathology or Statistical Artefact? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(5), 803–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bӧrzel, T. A. (2002). Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to Europeanization. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bribosia, E. (2012). Les Politiques D’intégration de l’Union Européenne et Des Etats Membres à L’épreuve Du Principe de Non-Discrimination. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and its Member States (pp. 51–82). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R. (2001). The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caporaso, J. (2007). The Three Worlds of Integration Theory. In P. R. Graziano (Ed.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas (pp. 23–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Carens, J. H. (2000). Culture, Citizenship, and Community a Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carrera, S. (2006). A Comparison of Integration Programmes in the EU. Trends and Weaknesses. (Centre for European Policy Studies, Challenge, No. 1).Google Scholar
  14. Carrera, S. (2008). Benchmarking Integration in the EU: Analyzing the Debate on Integration Indicators and Moving It Forward. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Carrera, S. (2009). In Search of the Perfect Citizen? The Intersection Between Integration, Immigration and Nationality in the EU. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrera, S., & Faure Atger, A. (2011). Integration as a Two-Way Process in the EU? Assessing the Relationship Between the European Integration Fund and the Common Basic Principles. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  17. Carrera, S., & Wiesbrock, A. (2009). Civic Integration of Third-Country Nationals Nationalism versus Europeanization in the Common EU Immigration Policy. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Castles, S. (1995). How Nation-States Respond to Immigration and Ethnic Diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 21(3), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2013). The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Caviedes, A. (2004). The Open Method of Co-ordination in Immigration Policy: A Tool for Prying Open Fortress Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Checkel, J. T. (2005). It’s the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics (ARENA Centre for European Studies Working Papers No. 26), University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  22. Collett, E. (2011). Immigrant Integration in Europe in a Time of Austerity. Migration Policy Institute. Available at http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/TCM-immigrant-integration-europe-time-austerity. Last Consulted November 12, 2016.
  23. Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830.Google Scholar
  24. de Haas, H., & Czaika, M. (2013). Measuring Migration Policies: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Migration and Citizenship, 1(2), 40–47.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission. (2011). The 2012 Ageing Report: Underlying Assumptions and Projection Methodologies. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  26. Exadaktylos, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (2012). Looking for Causality in the Literature on Europeanization. In T. Exadaktylos & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Featherstone, K. (2003). Introduction: In the Name of “Europe”. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (pp. 3–26). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geddes, A. (2004). Britain, France, and EU Anti-discrimination Policy: The Emergence of an EU Policy Paradigm. West European Politics, 27(2), 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geddes, A., & Achtnich, M. (2015). Research-Policy Dialogues in the European Union. In P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, & S. Verbeek (Eds.), Integrating Immigrants in Europe. Research-Policy Dialogues (pp. 293–314). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.Google Scholar
  30. Gilardoni, G., D’odorico, M., & Carrillo, D. (2015). KING Knowledge for Integration Governance Evidence on Migrants’ Integration in Europe. Milan: Fondazione ISMU.Google Scholar
  31. Groenendijk, K. (2004). Legal Concepts of Integration in EU Migration Law. European Journal of Migration and Law, 6(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Groenendijk, K., Fernhout, R., van Dam, D., van Oers, R., & Strik, T. (2007). The Family Reunification Directive in EU Member States: The First Year of Implementation. Nijmegen: Centre for Migration Law.Google Scholar
  33. Guiraudon, V. (2003). The Constitution of a European Immigration Policy Domain: A Political Sociology Approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Designing Smart Regulation. OECD and International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  35. Hailbronner, K. (2010). Implications of the EU Lisbon Treaty on EU Immigration Law. Paper Prepared for the Transatlantic Exchange for Academics in Migration Studies, San Diego.Google Scholar
  36. Halleskov, L. (2005). The Long-Term Residents Directive: A Fulfilment of the Tampere Objective of Near-Equality? European Journal of Migration and Law, 7(2), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hammar, T. (1990). Democracy and the Nation State: Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Handoll, J. (2012). Integration Policy in the European Union: The Question of Competence. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and Its Member States (pp. 15–50). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for Conducting Elite Interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hauschild, C. (2008). Die Integration von Zuwanderern. Ein Neues Politikfeld Für Die Europäische Union. In S. Magiera, K.-P. Sommermann, & J. Ziller (Eds.), Verwaltungswissenschaft und Verwaltungspraxis in nationaler und transnationaler Perspektive (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Duncker & Humbliot.Google Scholar
  41. Helbling, M. (2013). Validating Integration and Citizenship Policy Indices. Comparative European Politics, 11(5), 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Helbling, M., Bjerre, L., Römer, F., & Zobel, M. (2013). The Immigration Policies in Comparison (IMPIC) Index: The Importance of a Sound Conceptualization. Migration and Citizenship, 1(2), 8–14.Google Scholar
  43. Hepburn, E. (2010). “Citizens of the Region”: Party Conceptions of Regional Citizenship and Immigrant Integration. European Journal of Political Research, 50(4), 504–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kate, M.-A., & Niessen, J. (2007). Locating Immigrant Integration Policy Measures in the Machinery of the European Commission. European Programme for Integration and Migration.Google Scholar
  45. Keating, M. (2009). Social Citizenship, Devolution and Policy Divergence. In S. L. Greer (Ed.), Devolution and Social Citizenship in the UK (pp. 97–116). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  46. Keman, H. (2011). Comparative Research Methods. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative Politics (2nd ed., pp. 50–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kostakopoulou, T. (2002a). “Integrating” Non-EU Migrants in the European Union: Ambivalent Legacies and Mutating Paradigms. Columbia Journal of European Law, 8(2), 181–201.Google Scholar
  48. Kostakopoulou, T. (2002b). Long-Term Resident Third-Country Nationals in the European Union: Normative Expectations and Institutional Openings. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(3), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kundnani, A. (2012). Multiculturalism and Its Discontents: Left, Right and Liberal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lanzieri, G. (2010). Fewer, Older and Multicultural? A Projection of the Populations of the European Union Member States by Foreign/National Background. (Eurostat Statistical Working Paper).Google Scholar
  52. López-Santana, M. (2007). Soft Europeanization? How the Soft Pressure from Above Affects the Bottom (Differently): The Belgian, Spanish and Swedish Experiences. (EUI Working Papers, Vol. 10).Google Scholar
  53. Mahoney, J. (2010). After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research. World Politics, 62(1), 120–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller, D. (2008). Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(4), 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mügge, L., & van der Haar, M. (2016). Who Is an Immigrant and Who Requires Integration? Categorizing in European Policies. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. Contexts, Levels and Actors. (pp. 77–90). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.Google Scholar
  56. Mulcahy, S. (2011). Europe’s Migrant Policies: Illusions of Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murphy, C. (2009). Immigration, Integration and Citizenship in European Union Law: The Position of Third Country Nationals. Hibernian Law Journal, 8, 155–177.Google Scholar
  58. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  59. OECD. (2016). Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Europe. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Oosterom-Staples, H. (2007). The Family Reunification Directive: A Tool Preserving Member State Interest or Conducive to Family Unity? In A. Baldaccini, H. Toner, & P. E. Guild (Eds.), Whose Freedom, Security and Justice? EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy (pp. 451–488). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. Penninx, R. (2009). Decentralising Integration Policies. Managing Integration in Cities, Regions and Localities. (Policy Network Paper).Google Scholar
  62. Penninx, R. (2013). Research on Migration and Integration in Europe: Achievements and Lessons. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA.Google Scholar
  63. Penninx, M., Garcés-Mascareñas, B., Protasiewicz, P. M., Schwarz, H., & Caponio, T. (2014). European Cities and Their Migrant Integration Policies A State of the Art Study for the Knowledge for Integration Governance (KING) Project. (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Overview Paper No. 5).Google Scholar
  64. Poppelaars, C., & Scholten, P. (2008). Two Worlds Apart: The Divergence of National and Local Immigrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands. Administration & Society, 40(4), 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pratt, S. (2015). EU Policymaking and Research: Case Studies of the Communication on a Community Immigration Policy and the Common Basic Principles for Integration. In P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, & S. Verbeek (Eds.), Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research-Policy Dialogues (pp. 117–131). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Radaelli, C. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policy. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Richardson, J. (2012). Supranational State Building in the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a Policy-Making State? Policy Dynamics in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenow, K. (2009). The Europeanization of Integration Policies. International Migration, 47(1), 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schain, M. (2010). Managing Difference: Immigrant Integration Policy in France, Britain, and the United States. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 77(1), 205–236.Google Scholar
  70. Scharpf, F. W. (1990). Games Real Actors Could Play: The Problem of Mutual Predictability. Rationality and Society, 2(4), 471–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  72. Scholten, P., & Penninx, R. (2016). The Multilevel Governance of Migration and Integration’. In Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. Contexts, Levels and Actors (pp. 91–108). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.Google Scholar
  73. Shachar, A., & Hirschl, R. (2007). Citizenship as Inherited Property. Political Theory, 35(3), 253–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Snyder, F. (1993). Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community. In S. Martin (Ed.), The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noel (pp. 197–225). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Szyszczak, E. (2006). Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination. European Law Journal, 12(4), 486–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thielemann, E. (2001). The “Soft” Europeanization of Migration Policy: European Integration and Domestic Policy Change. Paper Presented at the ECSA Seventh Biennial International Conference.Google Scholar
  77. Thränhardt, D. (2014). The State of European Integration Governance: A Comparative Evaluation. (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Desk Research Paper, No. 7).Google Scholar
  78. Tilly, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2011). Overview of Contextual Political Analysis It Depends. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. TNS Qual+. (2011). Migrant Integration. European Commission: Qualitative Eurobarometer.Google Scholar
  80. Treib, O. (2014). Implementing and Complying with EU Governance Outputs. Living Reviews in European Governance, 9, 5–47.Google Scholar
  81. Trimikliniotis, N. (2012). The Instrumentalisation of EU Integration Policy: Reflecting on the Dignified Efficient and Undeclared Policy Aspects. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and Its Member States (pp. 109–128). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  82. Urth, H. (2005). Building a Momentum for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law, 7(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Wolleghem, P. G. (2014). Inclusive Political Community: The Challenge of Liberal Polities. In E. Codini & M. D’Odorico (Eds.), Democracy and Citizenship in the 21st Century: Critical Issues and Perspectives (pp. 23–38). Milan: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  84. Velluti, S. (2007). What European Union Strategy for Integrating Migrants? The Role of OMC Soft Mechanisms in the Development of an EU Immigration Policy. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9(1), 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vennesson, P. (2008). Case Studies and Process Tracing Theories and Practices. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (4th ed., pp. 223–239). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

EU Acts and Other Official Documents

  1. COM. (2003). 336 Final—European Commission (2003). Communication from the Commission on Immigration, Integration and Employment.Google Scholar
  2. Council of the European Union 14776/04. (2004). Note.Google Scholar
  3. European Council. (1999). Tampere European Council 15 And 16 October 1999, Presidency Conclusions.Google Scholar
  4. European Court of Auditors. (2012). Do the European Integration Fund and European Refugee Fund Contribute Effectively to the Integration of Third-Country Nationals? (Luxembourg).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem
    • 1
  1. 1.Fondazione ISMU and University of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations