Advertisement

Possibility of Identification of Modeling in Complex Analysis Geological and Geophysical Data

  • O. M. MuravinaEmail author
  • E. I. Davudova
  • I. A. Ponomarenko
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)

Abstract

The possibilities of the method of group accounting of arguments for the analysis geological and geophysical data are considered. Examples of the use of the method in the procedure for the formation of petrophysical models of sedimentary and crystalline rocks of Voronezh anteclise are given.

Keywords

Method of group accounting of arguments Petrophysics Identification modeling Voronezh anteclise 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The main results of the research were obtained in the framework of scientific research under the RFBR grant No. 18-05-00226.

References

  1. Glaznev, V. N, M. V. Mints and O. M. Muravina (2016). Density modeling of the central part of the East European platform. Vestnik KRAUNTS, Series of “Earth Sciences” T. 29, p. 53–63.Google Scholar
  2. Ivakhnenko, A G (1982). Inductive method of self-organization of models of complex systems: Kiev, Nauk. Dumka, 296 p.Google Scholar
  3. Kapitsa, SP, SP Kurdyumov and GG Malinetsky (1997). Synergetics and forecasts of the future: M., Nauka, 39p.Google Scholar
  4. Muravina, О.М. (2012). The method of group accounting of arguments in the analysis of geophysical data. Geophysics, № 6, p. 16–20.Google Scholar
  5. Muravina OM Identification analysis of petrophysical characteristics of sedimentary cover rocks of Voronezh anteclise (2013). Vestnik KRAUNTS, Series of “Earth Sciences” T. 29, p. 20–25.Google Scholar
  6. Muravina, OM, Glaznev VN (2013) Some results of a statistical analysis of the petrophysical parameters of sedimentary cover rocks of the Voronezh anteclise. Collection of materials of the XIV International Conference “Physical-Chemical and Petrophysical Studies in Earth Sciences”. Moscow, pp. 190–193.Google Scholar
  7. Muravina, O. M., Glaznev V. N. (2014). Structural and parametric models of petrophysical parameters of the sedimentary cover of the Voronezh anteclise. News of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences , 44, № 1, pp. 81–87.Google Scholar
  8. Muravina, О. М., E.I. Davudova and I.A. Ponomarenko (2016). Separation of the rocks of mikhailovsky series of the Voronezh crystalline massif for petrophysical and spatial parameters. Collection of materials of the XVII International Conference “Physical-Chemical and Petrophysical Studies in Earth Sciences”, Moscow, pp. 235–237.Google Scholar
  9. Muravina, О. М., E.I. Davudova and I.A. Ponomarenko (2017). Use of the method of group accounting of the arguments for detecting emissions in experimental petrophysical data. Collection of materials of the XVIII International Conference “Physical-Chemical and Petrophysical Studies in Earth Sciences”. Moscow, pp. 200–203.Google Scholar
  10. Muravina, О. М. (2016). Density model of the crust of the Voronezh crystalline massif. Bulletin of VSU, Series Geology, No. 1, pp. 108–114.Google Scholar
  11. Muravina, О. М. and I.A. Ponomarenko (2016). Program implementation of the group account method for arguments in identification modeling of geological-geophysical data. Bulletin of VSU, Series Geology, No. 2, pp. 107–110.Google Scholar
  12. Strakhov, VN, (2000). Geophysics and Mathematics. Methodological foundations of mathematical geophysics. Geophysics, №1, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. M. Muravina
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. I. Davudova
    • 1
  • I. A. Ponomarenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Voronezh State UniversityVoronezhRussia
  2. 2.Russian State University of Oil and Gas Named After I.M. GubkinMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations