Advertisement

An Organisational Perspective on Regulatory Capacity Building in the EU

  • Eva Heims
Chapter
Part of the Executive Politics and Governance book series (EXPOLGOV)

Abstract

The chapter develops the analytical framework of the book. It suggests that an organisational perspective that is rooted in a bureaucratic politics approach can help us to understand variation in patterns of support of EU agencies’ work on part of national regulators, which previous literature is unable to do. The chapter suggests that national regulators support EU agencies’ work when they perceive this to add value to their core work by helping them to handle key regulatory challenges. Regulatory challenges are conceptualised as institutionally embedded in specific policy sectors and countries. To substantiate this empirically the study focuses on sectors and countries with varying regulatory challenges, namely, drug safety monitoring, maritime safety, food safety and banking regulation in the UK and Germany.

Keywords

Bureaucratic politics Organisational approach Core mission Regulatory challenges 

References

  1. Alexander, E. R. (1995). How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R., & Black, J. (2016). Driving Priorities in Risk-Based Regulation: What’s the Problem? Journal of Law and Society, 43(4), 565–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Bekke, H. A., & Van Der Meer, F. M. (Eds.). (2001). Civil Service Systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Black, J. (2008). Form and Paradoxes of Principles-Based Regulation. Capital Markets Law Journal, 3(4), 425–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, D. P. (2010). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dunsire, A. (1978). Control in a Bureaucracy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gilad, S. (2015). Political Pressures, Organizational Identity, and Attention to Tasks: Illustrations From Pre-Crisis Financial Regulation. Public Administration, 93(3), 593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilardi, F. (2005). The Formal Independence of Regulators: A Comparison of 17 Countries and 7 Sectors. Swiss Political Science Review, 11(4), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gunningham, N. (2010). Enforcement and Compliance Strategies. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, & M. Lodge (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (pp. 120–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, P.A. (2009). Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heims, E. (2018). Why Cooperation Between Agencies Is (Sometimes) Possible: Turf Protection as Enabler of Regulatory Cooperation in the European Union. In T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination (pp. 113–131). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knill, C. (1998). European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2011). The Policy-Making Structure of European Regulatory Networks and the Domestic Adoption of Standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 830–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moran, M. (2003). The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller, M. (2002). The New Regulatory State in Germany. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  22. Nelissen, N. (2002). The Administrative Capacity of New Types of Governance. Public Organization Review, 2(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niskanen, W. A. (1994 [1971]). Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Brookfield: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Ogus, A. I. (2004). Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (Eds.). (2010). Tradition and Public Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing Horizontal Management: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  28. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  29. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy Networks: A British Perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richardson, J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  31. Ringbom, H. (2008). The EU Maritime Safety Policy and International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothstein, H., Borraz, O., & Huber, M. (2013). Risk and the Limits of Governance: Exploring Varied Patterns of Risk-Based Governance Across Europe. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  34. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, C. (2010). Standard-Setting in Regulatory Regimes. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, & M. Lodge (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (pp. 104–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Shapiro, S., & Rabinowitz, R. (1997). Punishment versus Cooperation in Regulatory Enforcement: A Case Study of OSHA. Administrative Law Review, 14(4), 713–762.Google Scholar
  37. Simon, H. (1957). Models of Man. Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Tan, A. K.-J. (2006). Vessel-Source Marine Pollution: The Law and Politics of International Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCartaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and Control of State Agencies: Comparing States and Agencies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Waller, P. (2010). An Introduction to Pharmacovigilance. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, J. Q. (2000 [1989]). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Heims
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations