Advertisement

Luxury Chairs and Pizzas: The Production of Social Spaces and Class

  • Leung Wing-Fai Email author
Chapter
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)

Abstract

This chapter contributes to our understanding of the social construction of the spaces used by virtual workers and digital entrepreneurs in Taiwan. It examines co-working and co-creation spaces. Through ethnography and interviews, the current research examines three co-working spaces in Taiwan and compares them with spaces in Hong Kong. The discussion combines Henri Lefebvre’s conceptualisation of the social production of space, Michel de Certeau’s notion of spatial stories, and seminal writings on conspicuous consumption and class in order to explain these work spaces. The places of work for these nascent entrepreneurs and co-workers can be explained through the articulation of social and cultural capital that marks the boundaries around an imagined community of the young, creative middle class. It concludes that there are two types of spatial arrangements: the spatial connection between traditional high-tech industries and the startup ecosystem, and co-working spaces as places of cultural and social networks.

References

  1. Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Aristocracy of Culture.” Media, Culture & Society 2 (1980): 225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson, 241–58. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. Brookfield, Jonathan. “The Network Structure of Big Business in Taiwan.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 7, no. 2 (2010): 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castells, Manuel. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Drucker, Peter. Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Ernst, Dieter. “Small Firms Competing in Globalized High-Tech Industries: The Co-evolution of Domestic and International Knowledge Linkages in Taiwan’s Computer Industry.” In The Global Challenge to Industrial Districts: Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Italy and Taiwan, edited by Paolo Guerrieri, Simona Iammarino, and Carlo Pietrobelli, 95–130. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Florida, Richard. “The Economic Geography of Talent.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92, no. 4 (2002a): 743–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Florida, Richard. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books, 2002b.Google Scholar
  11. Florida, Richard. “Cities and the Creative Class.” City & Community 2, no. 1 (2003): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottdiener, Mark. The Social Production of Urban Space. Austin: University of Texas, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. Gregg, Melissa. “Thanks for the Ad(d): Neoliberalism’s Compulsory Friendship.” Talk given at Goldsmiths College, University of London, July 2006. https://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/politicalfeeling/files/2007/09/thanks4adddraft.pdf.
  14. Kourtit, Karima, and Peter Nijkamp. “Impact of Cultural ‘Ambiance’ on the Spatial Distribution of Creative Professions: A Modeling Study on the Netherlands.” International Regional Science Review 41, no. 1 (2018): 103–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawton, Philip, Enda Murphy, and Declan Redmond. “Residential Preferences of the ‘Creative Class’?” Cities 31 (2013): 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lefebvre, Henri, and Donald Nicholson-Smith. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Leung, Wing-Fai, Rosalind Gill, and Keith Randle. “Getting in, Getting on, Getting Out? Women as Career Scramblers in the UK Film and Television Industries.” Sociological Review 63, no. SI (2015): 50–65.Google Scholar
  18. Leung, Wing-Fai. “The Strengths of Close Ties: Taiwanese Online Entrepreneurship, Gender and Intersectionality.” Information, Communication & Society 19, no. 8 (2016): 1046–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindtner, Silvia. “Hackerspaces and the Internet of Things in China: How Makers Are Reinventing Industrial Production, Innovation, and the Self.” China Information 28, no. 2 (2014): 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindtner, Silvia. “Hacking with Chinese Characteristics: The Promises of the Maker Movement Against China’s Manufacturing Culture.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40, no. 5 (2015): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moriset, Bruno. “Building New Places of the Creative Economy. The Rise of Coworking Spaces.” Paper presented at 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference. Utrecht University, the Netherlands, January 23–25, 2014. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00914075/document.
  22. Murphy, Enda, Linda Fox-Rogers, and Declan Redmond. “Location Decision Making of “Creative” Industries: The Media and Computer Game Sectors in Dublin, Ireland.” Growth and Change 46, no. 1 (2015): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neff, Gina. Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries. Boston, MA: MIT, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oakey, Raymond P. “Open Innovation and Its Relevance to Industrial Research and Development: The Case of High-Technology Small Firms.” International Small Business Journal 31, no. 3 (2013): 319–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pratt, Andy C. “New Media, the New Economy and New Spaces.” Geoforum 31, no. 4 (2000): 425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Randle, Keith, Wing-Fai Leung, and Juno Kurian. Creating Difference: Overcoming Barriers to Diversity in UK Film & Television Employment. Hatfield, Herts: University of Hertfordshire, 2007.Google Scholar
  27. Sabel, Charles, and AnnaLee Saxenian. “Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography Venture Capital in the ‘Periphery’: The New Argonauts, Global Search, and Local Institution Building.” Economic Geography 84, no. 4 (2008): 379–94.Google Scholar
  28. Saxenian, A. “Transnational Communities and the Evolution of Global Production Networks: The Cases of Taiwan, China and India.” Industry 9, no. 3 (2002): 183–202.Google Scholar
  29. Saxenian, AnnaLee, and Jinn-yuh Hsu. “The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10, no. 4 (2001): 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schön, Sandra, Martin Ebner, and Swapna Kumar. The Maker Movement. Implications of New Digital Gadgets, Fabrication Tools and Spaces for Creative Learning and Teaching. Barcelona: eLearning Papers, 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263655746_The_Maker_Movement_Implications_of_new_digital_gadgets_fabrication_tools_and_spaces_for_creative_learning_and_teaching.
  31. Shih, Chao-Ching, Tom M.Y. Lin, and Pin Luarn. “Fan-Centric Social Media: The Xiaomi Phenomenon in China.” Business Horizons 57, no. 3 (2014): 349–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Veblen, Thorstein. Theory of the Leisure Class. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1899.Google Scholar
  33. Wittel, A. “Towards a Network Sociality.” Theory Culture & Society 18, no. 6 (2001): 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang, Xiaoke, and Richard Whitley. “Changing Macro-Structural Varieties of East Asian Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 11, no. 2 (2013): 301–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zukin, Sharon. Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations