• Leung Wing-Fai Email author
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)


The introduction explains the significance of digital entrepreneurs in the East Asian context, before focusing on the case of Taiwan. It details women’s changing roles and their involvement as business owners in recent Taiwanese history. The economic conditions of the Asian Tiger countries—Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore—can be characterised by restructuring and political intervention by the respective states. This chapter describes how the Internet and mobile technology startups are a response to social, political and economic changes. The introduction analyses existing literature on entrepreneurship and discusses the focus of this monograph on individual entrepreneurs and their personal characteristics. It details the importance of the concept of intersectionality in understanding the life and work of startup entrepreneurs, and justifies the use of qualitative ethnographic research of the startup ecosystem.


  1. Abbas, Ackbar. “(H)Edge City: A Response to ‘Becoming (Postcolonial) Hong Kong’.” Cultural Studies 15, no. 3/4 (2001): 621–26.Google Scholar
  2. Acker, Joan. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organization.” Gender and Society 4, no. 2 (1990): 139–58.Google Scholar
  3. Acker, Joan. “Gendering Organizational Theory.” In Gendering Organizational Analysis, edited by Albert J. Mills and Peta Tancred, 248–60. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. Acker, Joan. “Gender, Capitalism and Globalization.” Critical Sociology 30, no. 1 (2004): 17–41.Google Scholar
  5. Anthias, Floya. “New Hybridities, Old Concepts: The Limits of ‘Culture’.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24, no. 4 (2001a): 619–41.Google Scholar
  6. Anthias, Floya. “The Material and the Symbolic in Theorizing Social Stratification: Issues of Gender, Ethnicity and Class.” The British Journal of Sociology 52, no. 3 (2001b): 367–90.Google Scholar
  7. Anthias, Floya. “Hierarchies of Social Location, Class and Intersectionality: Towards a Translocational Frame.” International Sociology 28, no. 1 (2012): 121–38.Google Scholar
  8. Anzaldúa, Gloria, ed. Making Face, Making Soul, Haciendo Caras: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Women of Color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Banks, Mark, and Katie Milestone. “Individualization, Gender and Cultural Work.” Gender, Work and Organization 18, no. 1 (2011): 73–89.Google Scholar
  10. Barbrook, Richard. “The High-Tech Gift Economy.” First Monday 3, no. 12 (1998).
  11. Bathelt, Harald. “Knowledge-Based Clusters: Regional Multiplier Models and the Role of “Buzz” and “Pipelines.” In Handbook of Research on Cluster Theory, edited by Charlie Karlsson, 78–92. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, Ulrich. The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson, 241–58. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  14. Brah, Avtar, and Ann Phoenix. “Ain’t I A Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 5, no. 3 (2004): 75–86.Google Scholar
  15. Brookfield, Jonathan. “The Network Structure of Big Business in Taiwan.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 27, no. 2 (2010): 257–79.Google Scholar
  16. Browne, Irene, and Joya Misra. “The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market.” Annual Review of Sociology 29 (2003): 487–513.Google Scholar
  17. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London and New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. Camagni, Roberto. “On the Concept of Territorial Competitiveness: Sound or Misleading?” Urban Studies 39, no. 13 (2002): 2395–411.Google Scholar
  19. Carastathis, Anna. “The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory.” Philosophy Compass 9, no. 5 (2014): 304–14.Google Scholar
  20. Carbin, Maria, and Sara Edenheim. “The Intersectional Turn in Feminist Theory: A Dream of a Common Language?” European Journal of Women’s Studies 20, no. 3 (2013): 233–48.Google Scholar
  21. Castaño, Cecilia, and Juliet Webster. “Understanding Women’s Presence in ICT: The Life Course Perspective.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3, no. 2 (2011): 365–86.Google Scholar
  22. Chang, Chin-fen. “The Employment Discontinuity of Married Women in Taiwan: Job Status, Ethnic Background and Motherhood.” Current Sociology 54, no. 2 (2006): 209–28.Google Scholar
  23. Chang, Shirley L. “Causes of Brain Drain and Solutions: The Taiwan Experience.” Studies in Comparative International Development 27, no. 1 (1992): 27–43.Google Scholar
  24. Chu, Yun-han. “State Structure and Economic Adjustment of the East Asian Newly Industrializing Countries.” International Organization 43, no. 4 (1989): 647–72.Google Scholar
  25. Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. London & New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Crenshaw, Kimberle. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43, no. 6 (1991): 1241–99.Google Scholar
  27. Crenshaw, Kimberle. “Why Intersectionality Can’t Wait.” Washington Post, September 24, 2015.
  28. Culpan, Tim. “Foxconn Said to Target Wearables with New Startup Fund.” Bloomberg, December 11, 2013.–12-10/foxconn-said-to-target-wearables-with-new-startup-fund.
  29. Damm, Jens. “Gender and Women Studies in Taiwan: From ‘New Feminism’ to Intersectionality.” Paper presented at The 2nd World Congress of Taiwan Studies, SOAS, London, June 18, 2015.Google Scholar
  30. Daniels, Jessie. “Race and Racism in Internet Studies: A Review and Critique.” New Media & Society 15, no. 5 (2012): 695–719.Google Scholar
  31. Diamond, Norma. “Women and Industry in Taiwan.” Modern China 5, no. 3 (1979): 317–40.Google Scholar
  32. Dill, Bonnie Thornton, and Ruth Enid Zambrana. “Critical Thinking about Inequality: An Emerging Lens.” In Emerging Intersections: Race, Class, and Gender in Theory, Policy and Practice, edited by Bonnie Thornton Dill and Ruth Enid Zambrana, 1–21. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  33. Drucker, Peter. Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.Google Scholar
  34. English-Lueck, J., Charles N. Darrah, and Andrea Saveri. “Trusting Strangers: Work Relationships in Four High-Tech Communities.” Information, Communication & Society 5, no. 1 (2002): 90–108.Google Scholar
  35. Ernst, Dieter. “Small Firms Competing in Globalized High-Tech Industries: The Co-evolution of Domestic and International Knowledge Linkages in Taiwan’s Computer Industry.” In The Global Challenge to Industrial Districts: Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Italy and Taiwan, edited by Guerrieri, Paolo, Simona Iammarino, and Carlo Pietrobelli, 95–130. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2001.Google Scholar
  36. Faulkner, Wendy. “The Technology Question in Feminism: A View from Feminist Technology Studies.” Women’s Studies International Forum 24, no. 1 (2001): 79–95.Google Scholar
  37. Florida, Richard. “Cities and the Creative Class.” City & Community 2, no. 1 (2003): 3–19.Google Scholar
  38. Gill, Rosalind. “Cool, Creative and Egalitarian? Exploring Gender in Project-Based New Media Work in Europe.” Information, Communication & Society 5, no. 1 (2002): 70–89.Google Scholar
  39. Gill, Rosalind. “Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 10, no. 2 (2007): 147–66.Google Scholar
  40. Gill, Rosalind, and Keith Grint. “The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research.” In The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research, 1–28. London: Taylor & Francis, 1995.Google Scholar
  41. Gregg, Melissa. “Thanks for the Ad(d): Neoliberalism’s Compulsory Friendship.” Talk given at Goldsmiths College, University of London, July 2006.
  42. Guerrier, Yvonne, Christina Evans, Judith Glover, and Cornelia Wilson. “‘Technical, but Not Very….’: Constructing Gendered Identities in IT-Related Employment.” Work, Employment & Society 23, no. 3 (2009): 494–511.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, Stuart. “The West and the Rest.” In Formations of Modernity, edited by Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben, 232–75. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, Stuart. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Milton Keynes: Open University Press and Sage, 1997.Google Scholar
  45. Harrison, Mark. “The Sunflower Movement in Taiwan.” April 18, 2014.
  46. Henry, Colette, Lene Foss, and Helene Ahl. “Gender and Entrepreneurship Research: A Review of Methodological Approaches.” International Small Business Journal 34, no. 3 (2016): 217–41.Google Scholar
  47. Hitt, Michael A., Ho-Uk Lee, and Emre Yucel. “The Importance of Social Capital to the Management of Multinational Enterprises: Relational Networks among Asian and Western Firms.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19, no. 2, 3 (2002): 353–72.Google Scholar
  48. Holvino, Evangelina. “Intersections: The Simultaneity of Race, Gender and Class in Organization Studies.” Gender, Work & Organization 17, no. 3 (2010): 248–77.Google Scholar
  49. Hsieh, Michelle Fei-yu. “Adapting SMEs in a Globalizing World: The Case from Taiwan.” Paper presented at Globalisation, Market Transformation and Taiwan Corporations Conference, Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, June 3, 2014.Google Scholar
  50. Jayawarna, Dilani, Oswald Jones, and Allan Macpherson. “Entrepreneurial Potential: The Role of Human and Cultural Capitals.” International Small Business Journal 32, no. 8 (2014a): 918–43.Google Scholar
  51. Jayawarna, Dilani, Julia Rouse, and Allan Macpherson. “Life Course Pathways to Business Start-Up.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 26, no. 3–4 (2014b): 282–312.Google Scholar
  52. Kalleberg, Arne L., and Kevin Hewison. “Confronting Precarious Work in Asia: Politics and Policies.” In Policy Responses to Precarious Work in Asia, edited by Michael Hsing-Huang Hsiao, Arne L. Kalleberg, and Kevin Hewison, 13–47. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, 2015.Google Scholar
  53. Kraemer, Kenneth L., and Jason Dedrick. “Entrepreneurship, Flexibility, and Policy Coordination: Taiwan’s Computer Industry.” The Information Society 12, no. 3 (1996): 215–49.Google Scholar
  54. Landry, Charles. Creative Cities: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan, 2000.Google Scholar
  55. Lee, Anru. “Stand by the Family: Gender and Taiwan’s Small-Scale Industry in the Global Context.” Anthropology of Work Review XXI, no. 3 (2000): 5–9.Google Scholar
  56. Leng, Tse-kang. “Economic Globalisation and IT Talent Flows Across the Taipei/Shanghai/ Silicon Valley Triangle.” Asian Survey 42, no. 2 (2002): 230–50.Google Scholar
  57. Lerman, Nina E., Arwen Palmer Mohun, and Ruth Oldenziel. “Versatile Tools: Gender Analysis and the History of Technology.” Technology and Culture 38, no. 1 (1997): 1.Google Scholar
  58. Leung, Wing-Fai. “The Strengths of Close Ties: Taiwanese Online Entrepreneurship, Gender and Intersectionality.” Information, Communication & Society 19, no. 8 (2016): 1046–60.Google Scholar
  59. Lin, Thung-hong. “Size Matters: The Causes and Consequences of the Expansion of Taiwanese Business Groups.” Paper presented at Globalisation, Market Transformation and Taiwan Corporations Conference, Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, June 3, 2014.Google Scholar
  60. Lu, Yu-hsia. “The Boss’s Wife and Taiwanese Small Family Business.” In Women’s Working Lives in East Asia, edited by Mary C. Brinton, 263–98. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  61. Marlow, Susan, and Maura McAdam. “Incubation or Induction? Gendered Identity Work in the Context of Technology Business Incubation.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39, no. 4 (2015): 791–816.Google Scholar
  62. Martinez Dy, Angela, Lee Martin, and Susan Marlow. “Developing a Critical Realist Positional Approach to Intersectionality.” Journal of Critical Realism 13, no. 5 (2014): 447–66.Google Scholar
  63. Martinez Dy, Angela, Susan Marlow, and Lee Martin. “A Web of Opportunity or the Same Old Story? Women Digital Entrepreneurs and Intersectionality Theory.” Human Relations 70, no. 3 (2016): 286–311.Google Scholar
  64. McCall, Leslie. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs 30, no. 3 (2005): 1771–800.Google Scholar
  65. McRobbie, Angela. (2016). Be Creative. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  66. Michie, Susan and Debra L. Nelson. “Barriers Women Face in Information Technology Careers: Self-Efficacy, Passion and Gender Biases.” Women in Management Review 21, no. 1 (2006): 10–27.Google Scholar
  67. Myers, Ramon H. “The Economic Transformation of the Republic of China on Taiwan.” The China Journal 99 (1984): 500–528.Google Scholar
  68. Neff, Gina. Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries. Boston, MA: MIT, 2012.Google Scholar
  69. Ong, Aihwa. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  70. Packer, George. “Change the World.” New Yorker Magazine, May 27, 2013.
  71. Panteli, Niki, Janet Stack, and Harvie Ramsay. “Gendered Patterns in Computing Work in the Late 1990s.” New Technology, Work and Employment 16, no. 1 (2001): 3–16.Google Scholar
  72. Pratt, Andy C. “New Media, the New Economy and New Spaces.” Geoforum 31, no. 4 (2000): 425–36.Google Scholar
  73. Pratt, Andy C. “Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B—Human Geography 90, no. 2 (2008): 107–17.Google Scholar
  74. Ross, Andrew. Nice Work if You can Get It: Life and Labor in Precarious Times. New York: New York University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  75. Sabel, Charles, and AnnaLee Saxenian. “Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography Venture Capital in the ‘Periphery’: The New Argonauts, Global Search, and Local Institution Building.” Economic Geography 84, no. 4 (2008): 379–94.Google Scholar
  76. Saxenian, AnnaLee. “Inside-Out: Regional Networks and Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 2, no. 2 (1996): 41–60.Google Scholar
  77. Saxenian, AnnaLee. “Transnational Communities and the Evolution of Global Production Networks: The Cases of Taiwan, China and India.” Industry & Innovation 9, no. 3 (2002): 183–202.Google Scholar
  78. Saxenian, AnnaLee. The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  79. Saxenian, AnnaLee, and Jinn-yuh Hsu. “The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10, no. 4 (2001): 893–921.Google Scholar
  80. Scholz, Trebor. “Platform Cooperativism vs. the Sharing Economy.” 2014. Accessed March 10, 2017.
  81. Scott, Allen J. New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion, 1988.Google Scholar
  82. Shane, Scott, and Jonathan Eckhardt. “The Individual-Opportunity Nexus.” In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, edited by Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch, 161–94. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 2003.Google Scholar
  83. Shih, Johanna. “Circumventing Discrimination: Gender and Ethnic Strategies in Silicon Valley.” Gender and Society 20, no. 2 (2006): 177–206.Google Scholar
  84. Simon, Scott. Sweet and Sour: Life-Worlds of Taipei Women Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.Google Scholar
  85. Stanworth, Celia. “Women and Work in the Information Age.” Gender, Work and Organization 7, no. 1 (2000): 20–32.Google Scholar
  86. Stearns, Timothy M., and Gerald E. Hills. “Entrepreneurship and New Firm.” Journal of Business Research 36, no. 1 (1996): 1–4.Google Scholar
  87. Storper, Michael, and Antony J. Venables. “Buzz: Face-to-Face Contact and the Urban Economy.” Journal of Economic Geography 4, no. 4 (2004): 351–70.Google Scholar
  88. Sui, Cindy. “Taiwan’s Struggle to Become an Innovation Leader.” BBC, September 18, 2013.
  89. Sung, Wen-Ti. “Campaign Ads and Taiwan’s Electoral Demography.” 2014. Accessed April 27, 2018.
  90. The Government of ROC. White Paper on SMEs in Taiwan, 2004. Taipei, Taiwan: 2004.Google Scholar
  91. Thorbecke, Erik, and Henry Wan. “Taiwan’s Development Experience: Stability with Growth, 1950–2002.” In Taiwan in the 21st Century: Aspects and Limitations of a Development Model, edited by M. Megan Greene, and Robert Ash, 54–73. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
  92. Trauth, Eileen M. “Odd Girl Out: An Individual Differences Perspective on Women in the IT Profession.” Information Technology & People 15, no. 2 (2002): 98–118.Google Scholar
  93. Up Global. Fostering a Startup and Innovation Ecosystem. Seattle, WA: Up Global, 2014.Google Scholar
  94. Vecchio, Robert P. “Entrepreneurship and Leadership: Common Trends and Common Threads.” Human Resource Management Review 13, no. 2 (2003): 303–28.Google Scholar
  95. Wajcman, Judy. “From Women and Technology to Gendered Technoscience.” Information, Communication & Society 10, no. 3 (2007): 287–98.Google Scholar
  96. Wennekers, Sanders, and Roy Thurik. “Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth.” Small Business Economics 13, no. 1 (1999): 27–56.Google Scholar
  97. Wittel, Andreas. “Towards a Network Sociality.” Theory Culture & Society 18, no. 6 (2001): 51–76.Google Scholar
  98. Wong, Siu-lun. “The Chinese Family Firm: A Model.” The British Journal of Sociology 36, no. 1 (2014): 58–72.Google Scholar
  99. Yuval-Davis, Nira. “Intersectionality and Feminist Politics.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 13, no. 3 (2006): 193–209.Google Scholar
  100. Zhang, X., and Richard Whitley. “Changing Macro-structural Varieties of East Asian Capitalism.” Socio-economic Review 11, no. 2 (2013): 301–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations