Advertisement

Experimental Evaluation of the Components of Cognitive-Behavioural Training Using Illusory Motion in an Optokinetic Drum

  • Thomas G. DobieEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Naval Architecture, Marine Engineering, Shipbuilding and Shipping book series (NAMESS, volume 6)

Abstract

When I first proposed my course of cognitive-behavioural desensitisation training, it generated its fair share of adverse comments. For a start, the naysayers believed that I was only putting off the evil day and all of my clients would fall by the wayside sooner or later with a resumption of motion sickness. The programme would simply waste time and money. Others believed that it was merely a behavioural desensitising programme and there was no point in the so-called cognitive component. I would very much like to have addressed the latter issue at that time, but was convinced that both were necessary and above all, my clients only had one shot for success. As to the former question, only time would tell. Finally, there was no question of having a control group for ethical reasons. I am pleased to tell you that I have been able to address these issues since then and the answers are to be found in this chapter.

References

  1. Banks RD, Salisbury DA, Ceresia PJ (1992) The Canadian Forces airsickness rehabilitation program. Aviat Space Environ Med 63:1098–1101Google Scholar
  2. Benson AJ (1988) Motion sickness. In: Ernsting J, King P (eds) Aviation medicine, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bower EA, Clark JB, McCoy JG, Rupert AH (1993) Recent Navy experience in self paced airsickness. Aviat Space Environ Med. In: 64th. Annual Scientific Meeting Program Abstract #15Google Scholar
  4. Cowings PS, Malmstrom FV (1984) What you thought you knew about motion sickness isn’t necessarily so. Flying Saf 53:570–575Google Scholar
  5. Dichgans J, Brandt T (1973) Optokinetic motion sickness as pseudo-Coriolis effects induced by moving visual stimuli. Acta Otolaryngol 76:339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobie TG (1974) Airsickness in aircrew. AGARDOGRAPH No. 177, North Atlantic Treaty Organization Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly-sur-Seine, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobie TG, May JG (1995) The effectiveness of a motion sickness counseling program. Br J Clin Psychol 34:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobie TG, May JG (1996) The optimal number of counseling sessions for the prevention of motion sickness. NBDL-96R001, Naval Biodynamics Laboratory, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobie TG, May JG, Fisher WD, Elder ST, Kubitz KA (1987) A comparison of two methods of training resistance to visually-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 58(9, Suppl.):A34–41Google Scholar
  10. Dobie TG, May JG, Fisher WD, Bologna NB (1989) An evaluation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for training resistance to visually-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 60:307–314Google Scholar
  11. Elder ST, Geoffray DJ, McAfee RD (1981) Essential hypertension: a behavioral perspective. In: Haynes SM, Gannon L (eds) Psychosomatic disorders: a psychophysiological approach to etiology and treatment. Praeger Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. Flanagan MB, May JG, Dobie TG (2002) Optokinetic nystagmus, vection and motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 73:1067–1073Google Scholar
  13. Gamble EH, Elder ST (1983) Multimodal biofeedback in the treatment of migraine. Biofeedback Self Regul 8:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu S, Grant WF, Stern RM, Koch KL (1991) Motion sickness severity and physiological correlates during repeated exposures to a rotating optokinetic drum. Aviat Space Environ Med 62:308–314Google Scholar
  15. Hu S, Glaser KM, Hoffman TS, Stanton TM, Gruber MB (1996) Motion sickness susceptibility to optokinetic rotation correlates to past history of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 667:320–324Google Scholar
  16. Kimmel HD (1974) Instrumental conditioning of autonomically mediated responses in human beings. Am Psychol 29:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lashley J, Elder ST (1982) Selected case studies in clinical biofeedback. J Clin Psychol 38:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lashley JK, Elder ST (1984) Some biofeedback successes and failures. Am J Biofeedback 7:49–58Google Scholar
  19. Levy RA, Jones DR, Carlson EH (1981) Biofeedback rehabilitation of airsick aircrew. Aviat Space Environ Med 52(2):118–121Google Scholar
  20. Miller NE (1969) Learning visceral and glandular responses. Science 163:434–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reason JT, Brand JJ (1975) Motion sickness. Academic Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  22. Stern RM, Hu S, Vasey MW, Koch KL (1989) Adaption to vection-induced symptoms of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 60:566–572Google Scholar
  23. Stern RM, Hu S, Anderson RB, Leibowoitz HW, Koch KL (1990) The effects of fixation and restricted visual field on vection-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 61:712–715Google Scholar
  24. Yang T, Pei J (1991) Motion sickness severity under interaction of vection and head movements. Aviat Space Environ Med 62:141Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Biodynamics Laboratory, College of EngineeringUniversity of New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations