Advertisement

Solar Water Detoxification

  • Alejandro CabreraEmail author
  • Sara Miralles
  • Lucas Santos-Juanes
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

Persistent organic pollutants cannot be treated by biological processes as these compounds are non-biodegradable and mostly toxic. In this context, advanced oxidation processes (AOP) have evolved as an emerging alternative. Time is the independent variable used to represent the process of evolution in chemical engineering. Nevertheless, time is not an effective variable to represent the evolution of a solar driven process since solar irradiation is also changing during the operation of the solar photoreactor. For this reason, accumulated UV solar energy has become one of the typically used variables to represent process evolution. Besides, the modeling of photocatalytic reactors requires an analysis of the radiation field in the photoreactor. UV irradiation has to be monitored during the solar treatment by means of UV radiometer. The absorbance spectral range of the catalyst determines the measurement range; being 320–400 nm the most used one for solar photo-Fenton. Yearly and/or monthly average values are also needed for plant scaling up, consequently, solar UV monitoring is essential.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ph.D. Sara Miralles-Cuevas acknowledges MINECO for his Juan de la Cierva-formación grant (No. FJCI-2016-28965). Ph.D. Alejandro Cabrera wishes to thanks FONDECYT/Iniciación/11160680 and SERC Chile (FONDAP/15110019).

References

  1. Alfano OM, Negro AC, Cabrera MI, Cassano AE (1995) Scattering effects produced by inert particles in photochemical reactors. 1. Model and experimental verification. Ind Eng Chem Res.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00041a009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechtel Corporation (1991) Conceptual design of a photocatalytic wastewater treatment plant, Report SAND 91-7005Google Scholar
  3. Blanco J (2005) El reactor solar fotocatalítico: estado del arte. In: Solar safe water project bookGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanco J, Malato S, Fernández P et al (1999) Compound parabolic concentrator technology development to commercial solar detoxification applications. Sol Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-092x(00)00078-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabrera Reina A, Santos-Juanes Jordá L, García Sánchez JL et al (2012) Modelling photo-fenton process for organic matter mineralization, hydrogen peroxide consumption and dissolved oxygen evolution. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.02.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera Reina A, Casas López JL, Maldonado Rubio MI et al (2014) Effects of environmental variables on the photo-fenton plant design. Chem Eng J 237:469–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2013.10.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera Reina A, Santos-Juanes Jordá L, Casas López J et al (2015a) Biological oxygen demand as a tool to predict membrane bioreactor best operating conditions for a photo-Fenton pretreated toxic wastewater. J Chem Technol Biotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrera Reina A, Santos-Juanes L, García Sánchez JL et al (2015b) Modelling the photo-fenton oxidation of the pharmaceutical paracetamol in water including the effect of photon absorption (VRPA). Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabrera Reina A, Miralles-Cuevas S, Casas López JL, Sánchez Pérez JA (2017) Pyrimethanil degradation by photo-fenton process: influence of iron and irradiance level on treatment cost. Sci Total Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carra I, Santos-Juanes L, Acién Fernández FG et al (2014) New approach to solar photo-Fenton operation. Raceway ponds as tertiary treatment technology. J Hazard Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassano AE, Martin CA, Brandi RJ, Alfano OM (1995) Photoreactor analysis and design: fundamentals and applications. Ind Eng Chem Res.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00046a001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curcó D, Malato S, Blanco J, Giménez J (1996) Photocatalysis and radiation absorption in a solar plant. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0248(96)00059-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dillert R, Cassano AE, Goslich R, Bahnemann D (1999) Large scale studies in solar catalytic wastewater treatment. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5861(99)00188-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donati G, Paludetto R (1997) Scale up of chemical reactors. Catal Today 34:483–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00069-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández-García A, Zarza E, Valenzuela L, Pérez M (2010) Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Genthe B, Le Roux WJ, Schachtschneider K et al (2013) Health risk implications from simultaneous exposure to multiple environmental contaminants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.03.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goswami DY, Sharma SK, Mathur GD, Jotshi CK (1997) Analysis of solar detoxification systems. Sol Energy Eng 119Google Scholar
  18. Guillard C, Disdier J, Herrmann JM, et al (1999) Comparison of various titania samples of industrial origin in the solar photocatalytic detoxification of water containing 4-chlorophenol. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5861(99)00184-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta BP, Anderson JV (1991) Solar detoxification of hazardous waste—an overview of the U.S. Department of Energy program. Sol Energy Mater 24:40–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1633(91)90047-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrmann JM, Guillard C, Disdier J et al (2002) New industrial titania photocatalysts for the solar detoxification of water containing various pollutants. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-3373(01)00265-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiménez AE, Estrada CA, Cota AD, Román A (2000) Photocatalytic degradation of DBSNa using solar energy. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 60:85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(99)00066-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kusic H, Peternel I, Ukic S et al (2011) Modeling of iron activated persulfate oxidation treating reactive azo dye in water matrix. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Langenbach T (2013) Persistence and bioaccumulation of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). In: Applied bioremediation—active and passive approaches. InTechGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Puma G (2003) Modeling of thin-film slurry photocatalytic reactors affected by radiation scattering. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0300362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malato S, Blanco J, Richter C et al (1998) Enhancement of the rate of solar photocatalytic mineralization of organic pollutants by inorganic oxidizing species. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-3373(98)00019-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malato S, Caceres J, Agüera A et al (2001) Degradation of imidacloprid in water by photo-fenton and TiO2 photocatalysis at a solar pilot plant: a comparative study. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es000289kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malato S, Blanco J, Vidal A, Richter C (2002) Photocatalysis with solar energy at a pilot-plant scale: an overview. Appl. Catal. B EnvironGoogle Scholar
  28. Malato S, Blanco J, Vidal A, et al (2003) Applied studies in solar photocatalytic detoxification: an overview. Sol Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malato S, Fernández-Ibáñez P, Maldonado MI et al (2009) Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: recent overview and trends. Catal TodayGoogle Scholar
  30. Marugán J, van Grieken R, Cassano AE, Alfano OM (2009) Scaling-up of slurry reactors for the photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide with TiO2 and silica-supported TiO2 suspensions. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.12.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthews RW (1986) Photo-oxidation of organic material in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide. Water Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(86)90020-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Minero C, Pelizzetu E, Malato S, Blanco J (1996) Large solar plant photocatalytic water decontamination: effect of operational parameters. Sol Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(96)00029-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Motegh M, Van Ommen JR, Appel PW, Kreutzer MT (2014) Scale-up study of a multiphase photocatalytic reactor—Degradation of cyanide in water over TiO2. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es403378eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Navntoft C, Dawidowski L, Blesa MA et al (2009) UV-A (315–400 nm) irradiance from measurements at 380 nm for solar water treatment and disinfection: comparison between model and measurements in Buenos Aires. Sol Energy, Argentina and Almería, Spain.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Organization World Health (WHO), United United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2017) Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselinesGoogle Scholar
  36. Pacheco JE, Prairie MR, Yellowhorse L (1993) Photocatalytic destruction of chlorinated solvents in water with solar energy. J Sol Energy Eng 115:123.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2930038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parra S, Malato S, Pulgarin C (2002) New integrated photocatalytic-biological flow system using supported TiO2 and fixed bacteria for the mineralization of isoproturon. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-3373(01)00293-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piccinno F, Hischier R, Seeger S, Som C (2016) From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies. J Clean Prod.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rivas G, Carra I, García Sánchez JL et al (2015) Modelling of the operation of raceway pond reactors for micropollutant removal by solar photo-fenton as a function of photon absorption. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rivera-Utrilla J, Sánchez-Polo M, Ferro-García MÁ et al (2013) Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water a review. ChemosphereGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodriguez M, Timokhin V, Michl F et al (2002) The influence of different irradiation sources on the treatment of nitrobenzene. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5861(02)00227-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodríguez M, Malato S, Pulgarin C et al (2005) Optimizing the solar photo-Fenton process in the treatment of contaminated water. Determination of intrinsic kinetic constants for scale-up. Sol EnergyGoogle Scholar
  43. Satuf ML, Brandi RJ, Cassano AE, Alfano OM (2007) Scaling-up of slurry reactors for the photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spasiano D, Marotta R, Malato S et al (2015) Solar photocatalysis: materials, reactors, some commercial, and pre-industrialized applications. A comprehensive approach. Appl Catal B EnvironGoogle Scholar
  45. Toepfer B, Gora A, Li Puma G (2006) Photocatalytic oxidation of multicomponent solutions of herbicides: reaction kinetics analysis with explicit photon absorption effects. Appl Catal B Environ 68:171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Cabrera
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sara Miralles
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lucas Santos-Juanes
    • 4
  1. 1.Escuela Universitaria de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad de TarapacáAricaChile
  2. 2.Solar Energy Research Centre (CIESOL)AlmeríaSpain
  3. 3.Chemical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of AlmeríaAlmeríaSpain
  4. 4.Departamento de Ingeniería Textil, Papelera de la Universitat Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations