Advertisement

Monstrous Machines and Devilish Devices

  • Gwyneth Peaty
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, Peaty examines how the evolutions of science and technology have birthed a horde of literary horrors, from Mary Shelley’s “hideous progeny” to psychotic supercomputers. Starting with the Industrial Revolution, she explores the ongoing relationship between technology and horror, focusing on the links between science, technological innovation, and mechanised monstrosities in popular literature. Beginning with an overview of the historical context, the chapter outlines several key themes and novels of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries before shifting to consider how literary horror has responded to the networked technologies of the twenty-first century.

Bibliography

  1. Bann, Stephen, ed. 1994. Frankenstein, Creation, and Monstrosity. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bear, Greg. 2004. Dead Lines. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, Linnie, and Xavier Aldana Reyes. 2016. Introduction: Horror in the Digital Age. In Digital Horror: Haunted Technologies, Network Panic and the Found Footage Phenomenon, ed. Linnie Blake and Xavier Aldana Reyes, 1–13. London: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  4. Botting, Fred. 2005. Reading Machines. Romantic Circles. https://www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/gothic/botting/botting. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  5. Campbell, Norah, and Mike Saren. 2010. The Primitive, Technology and Horror: A Posthuman Biology. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 10 (2). http://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstream/handle/2262/56866/The%20?sequence=1. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  6. Duchaney, Brian N. 2015. The Spark of Fear: Technology, Society and the Horror Film. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  7. Ellison, Harlan. 2014/1967. I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. In The Harlan Ellison Collection: I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream, ed. Harlan Ellison, 13–29. New York: Open Road.Google Scholar
  8. Funk, Isaac K. 1911/1904. The Widow’s Mite and Other Psychic Phenomena. London: Funk and Wagnalls. https://archive.org/details/widowsmiteandot00funkgoog. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  9. Gelder, Ken. 2000. Introduction: The Field of Horror. In The Horror Reader, ed. Ken Gelder, 1–10. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Halberstam, Judith. 1995. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Home Recording of Copyrighted Works. 2002. US Government. House of Representatives Hearing, 1982. https://cryptome.org/hrcw-hear.htm. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  12. Huyssen, Andreas. 1986. After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jowett, Lorna, and Stacey Abbott. 2013. TV Horror: Investigating the Dark Side of the Small Screen. Kindle ed. London: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  14. King, Stephen. 2006. Cell. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  15. Koontz, Dean. 1997/1973. Demon Seed. New York: Berkley.Google Scholar
  16. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lovecraft, H.P. 2009/1927. Supernatural Horror in Literature. http://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/essays/shil.aspx. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  18. Matheson, Richard. 1995/1954. I am Legend. New York: Tor Books.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2017/1953. Long Distance Call. In The Best of Richard Matheson, ed. Victor LaValle, 253–265. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Mays, Sas, and Neil Matheson. 2013. The Machine and the Ghost: Technology and Spiritualism in Nineteenth-to Twenty-First-Century Art and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McKinney, Devin. 2014. Phone Horror (2). HiLowBrow. http://hilobrow.com/2014/06/11/phone-horror-2/. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  22. Natale, Simone. 2016. Supernatural Entertainments: Victorian Spiritualism and the Rise of Modern Media Culture. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  23. Piatti-Farnell, Lorna. 2014. The Vampire in Contemporary Popular Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Ruston, Sharon. 2015. The Science of Life and Death in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. The Public Domain Review. http://publicdomainreview.org/2015/11/25/the-science-of-life-and-death-in-mary-shelleys-frankenstein/. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  25. Sconce, Jeffrey. 2000. Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Shelley, Mary. 2012/1818. Frankenstein. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  27. Stoker, Bram. 2013/1897. Dracula. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/345/345-h/345-h.htm. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  28. Suarez, Daniel. 2009. Daemon. London: Quercus.Google Scholar
  29. Tolstoy, Leo. 1902. What is Religion?: And Other New Articles and Letters. Transl. V. Tchertkoff and A.C. Fifield. New York: T.Y. Crowell. https://archive.org/details/whatisreligionot00tols. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  30. Tropp, Martin. 1990. Images of Fear: How Horror Stories Helped Shape Modern Culture (1818–1918). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  31. Wells, H.G. 2012/1896. The Island of Dr. Moreau. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/159/159-h/159-h.htm. Accessed January 14, 2018.
  32. Wicke, Jennifer. 1992. Vampiric Typewriting: Dracula and Its Media. ELH 59 (2): 467–493. http://users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/Bibliomania!/Vampiric%20Typewriting%20Dracula%20and%20Its%20Media.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Woodward, Kathleen. 2004. A Feeling for the Cyborg. In Data Made Flesh: Embodying Information, ed. Robert Mitchell and Phillip Thurtle, 181–197. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gwyneth Peaty
    • 1
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations