Advertisement

Discussing Dolls: Horror and the Human Double

  • Sandra Mills
Chapter

Abstract

The animate doll is a firm fixture of the horror genre; from the infamous homicidal Chucky, to recent incarnations of troubled toy narratives including Annabelle and The Boy, in horror cinema, talking dolls are now commonplace. Similarly, these totemic miniature humans populate horror literature. Writers continue to capitalize on their eerie nature, creating narratives which transgress bodily borders, where troubled toys come to life. These literary “living” doll narratives have received scant critical attention in comparison to their visual counterparts. With this in mind, this chapter considers the animate doll’s place in contemporary horror fiction by providing an overview of their position in the genre more widely and through close analysis of one key text: Ramsey Campbell’s The Doll Who Ate His Mother.

Bibliography

  1. Aldana Reyes, Xavier. 2016a. Introduction: What, Why and When Is Horror Fiction. In Horror: A Literary History, ed. Xavier Aldana Reyes, 7–17. London: The British Library.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2016b. Post-Millennial Horror, 2000–16. In Horror: A Literary History, ed. Xavier Aldana Reyes, 189–214. London: The British Library.Google Scholar
  3. Bachelard, Gaston. 1994. The Poetics of Space: The Classic Look at How We Experience Intimate Places. Trans. Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birch, Dinah, ed. 2016. The Oxford Companion to English Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780192806871.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackmore, Leigh. 2014. ‘A Puppets Parody of Joy’: Dolls, Puppets, and Mannikins as Diabolical Other in Ramsey Campbell. In Ramsey Campbell: Critical Essays on the Modern Master of Horror, ed. Gary William Crawford, 23–46. Lanham: Scarecrow Press Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, Ramsey. 1988. The Doll Who Ate His Mother. London: Arrow Books Limited.Google Scholar
  7. Corsini, Raymond J., ed. 2002. The Dictionary of Psychology. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, Sigmund. 2003. The Uncanny. Trans. David McLintock. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Hurley, Kelly. 2004. The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism, and Degeneration at the Fin De Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jentsch, Ernst. 2008. On the Psychology of the Uncanny. Trans. Roy Sellars. In Uncanny Modernity: Cultural Theories, Modern Anxieties, ed. Jo Collins and John Jervis, 216–228. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Jervis, John. 2008. Uncanny Presences. In Uncanny Modernity: Cultural Theories, Modern Anxieties, ed. Jo Collins and John Jervis, 10–50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, Stephen. 1993. Danse Macabre. London: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  13. Neale, Stephen. 1980. Genre. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Simms, Eva-Maria. 1996. Uncanny Dolls: Images of Death in Rilke and Freud. New Literary History 27 (4): 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wood, Gaby. 2002. Living Dolls: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life. London: Faber and Faber Limited.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Mills
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations