Advertisement

EUS-Guided Core Biopsy

  • Ali Siddiqui
Chapter

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by using fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has been introduced so as to overcome the limitations of fine needle aspiration (FNA). There are currently several commercially available FNB needles now available. FNB allows for a superior diagnostic yield to FNA and allows us to obtain actual histologic tissue. Overall, the ability of EUS to obtain core tissue specimens from primary tumors, lymph nodes, the liver, and metastases makes these devices invaluable in the era of modern, interventional EUS. Ongoing studies will further clarify ideal needle types and sizes for different indications and target locations.

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound Fine needle biopsy Fine needle aspiration Pancreatic cancer Liver biopsy Lymphadenopathy Gastrointestinal stromal tumors 

Supplementary material

Video 8.1

EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of a pancreatic head mass (Courtesy of Boston Scientific Corporation) (MP4 21932 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, Sandha GS. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23:26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hébert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S, et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Jhala N, et al. Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2841–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalaitzakis E, Panos M, Sadik R, et al. Clinicians’ attitudes towards endoscopic ultrasound: a survey of four European countries. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:100–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braat H, Bruno M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Pancreatic cancer: promise for personalised medicine? Cancer Lett. 2012;318:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wakatsuki T, Irisawa A, Terashima M, et al. ATP assay-guided chemosensitivity testing for gemcitabine with biopsy specimens obtained from unresectable pancreatic cancer using endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011;16:387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brais RJ, Davies SE, O’Donovan M, et al. Direct histological processing of EUS biopsies enables rapid molecular biomarker analysis for interventional pancreatic cancer trials. Pancreatology. 2012;12:8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiersema MJ, Levy MJ, Harewood GC, et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies of perigastric organs. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:275–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, et al. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided Trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:101–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shah SM, Ribeiro A, Levi J, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with and without Trucut biopsy of pancreatic masses. JOP. 2008;9:422–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wahnschaffe U, Ullrich R, Mayerle J, et al. EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies as first-line diagnostic method for patients with intestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2351–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:384–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ribeiro A, Pereira D, Escalón MP, et al. EUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis and classification of lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:851–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:417–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A, et al. Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy. 2005;37:362–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larghi A, Capurso G, Carnuccio A, et al. Ki-67 grading of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on histologic samples obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:570–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:316–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:336–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3733–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, et al. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:321–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JB, et al. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:909–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DiMaio CJ, Kolb JM, Benias PC, et al. Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(9):E974–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(6):1034–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jovani M, Abidi WM, Lee LS. Novel fork-tip needles versus standard needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid masses of the upper GI tract: a matched cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(6-7):784–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nayar MK, Paranandi B, Dawwas MF, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(5):1017–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mitri RD, Rimbaş M, Attili F, et al. Performance of a new needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in patients with pancreatic solid lesions: a retrospective multicenter study. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_33_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee JH, Cho CJ, Park YS, et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy for the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors larger than 2 cm. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(4):486–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    El Chafic AH, Loren D, Siddiqui A, et al. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(3):510–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Storch I, Shah M, Thurer R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: when tissue is the issue. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pathrabe R, Udawat H, Dave D, et al. Randomized study comparing conventional needle fine needle aspiration to procore biopsy needle in patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and masses of unknown origin. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017;6(Suppl 1):S10.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nagula S, Pourmand K, Aslanian H, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration and endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy for solid lesions in a multicenter, randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017:16(8):1307–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Cummings O, et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided Tru-cut biopsy of benign liver disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:535–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gleeson FC, Clayton AC, Zhang L, et al. Adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound core needle biopsy specimen of nonmalignant hepatic parenchymal disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mathew A. EUS-guided routine liver biopsy in selected patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2354–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Z, et al. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:310–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Diehl DL, Johal AS, Khara HS, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a multicenter experience. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nguyen P, Feng JC, Chang KJ. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of liver lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:357–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    tenBerge J, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of the liver: indications, yield, and safety based on an international survey of 167 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:859–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Singh P, Erickson RA, Mukhopadhyay P, et al. EUS for detection of the hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling using core biopsy needle as a percutaneous biopsy rescue for diagnosis of solid liver mass: combined histological-cytological analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(7):1161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Siddiqui
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyFish Memorial HospitalOrange CityUSA

Personalised recommendations