Advertisement

BRIC Countries and Foreign Direct Investment: From IDI to ODI

  • Valeria Gattai
  • Rajssa Mechelli
  • Piergiovanna Natale
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we overview aggregated Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) originating (directed) from (to) Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC). The last 20 years have witnessed BRIC countries become an important hub for FDI. In 1995, BRIC countries attracted 13.5% of world Inward Direct Investment (IDI) flows and accounted for 4.5% of world IDI stocks. In 2016, they became the destination for 15.7% of world IDI flows and accounted for 10% of world IDI stocks. Regardless of how striking these figures may appear, BRIC countries’ performance in terms of Outward Direct Investment (ODI) has been even more impressive. In 1995, BRIC countries contributed 1.1% to world ODI flows and 1.7% to world ODI stocks. In 2016, they accounted for 14.2% of world ODI flows, and their share in world ODI stocks peaked at 7.4%. We argue that these patterns are consistent with the Investment Development Path model, and help explain how BRIC countries have turned from IDI recipients to ODI promoters. Next, we provide individual country overviews. To this aim, we discuss the evolution of FDI in BRIC countries and highlight the features of FDI policies—if any—governing and supporting FDI.

Keywords

FDI ODI IDI BRIC FDI policies FDI data 

References

  1. Andreff, W. (2015). Outward Foreign Direct Investment from BRIC Countries: Comparing Strategies of Brazilian, Russian, Indian and Chinese Multinational Companies. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 12, 79–131.Google Scholar
  2. Arbix, G., & Caseiro, L. (2011). Destination and Strategy of Brazilian Multinationals. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 6, 207–238.Google Scholar
  3. Davies, K. (2013). Outward FDI from China and Its Policy Context, 2012. In K. P. Sauvant, P. Mallampally, & G. McAllister (Eds.), Inward and Outward FDI Country Profiles (2nd ed., pp. 755–768). New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.Google Scholar
  4. De Abreu Campanario, M., Stal, E., & Muniz da Silva, M. (2013). Brazil: Outward FDI and Its Policy Context, 2012. In K. P. Sauvant, P. Mallampally, & G. McAllister (Eds.), Inward and Outward FDI Country Profiles (2nd ed., pp. 658–674). New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.Google Scholar
  5. Dunning, J. H. (1981). Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Development Approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 119, 30–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. (1998). The Investment Development Path Revisited: Some Emerging Issues. In J. H. Dunning & R. Narula (Eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and Governments. Catalysts for Economic Restructuring (pp. 1–41). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Export-Import Bank of India. (2014, May). Outward Direct Investment from India: Trends, Objectives and Policy Perspectives. Occasional Paper n. 165.Google Scholar
  8. Garcia-Herrero, A., & Deorukhakar, S. (2014, June). What Explains India’s Surge in Outward Direct Investment? BBVA WP 14/16.Google Scholar
  9. Garcia-Herrero, A., Xia, L., & Casanova, C. (2015, June). Chinese Outbound Foreign Direct Investment: How Much Goes Where After Round-Tripping and Offshoring? BBVA WP 15/17.Google Scholar
  10. Liuhto, K. T., & Majuri, S. S. (2014). Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Russia: A Literature Review. Journal of East-West Business, 20, 198–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pradhan, J. P. (2017). Indian Outward FDI: A Review of Recent Developments. Transnational Corporations (UNCTAD), 24, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sauvant, K. P. (2016). China, the G20 and the International Investment Regime. China & World Economy, 24, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sauvant, K. P., & Chen, V. Z. (2014). China’s Regulatory Framework for Outward Foreign Direct Investment. China Economic Journal, 7, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sauvant, K. P., Economou, P., Gal, K., et al. (2014). Trends in FDI, Home Country Measures and Competitive Neutrality. In A. K. Bjorklund (Ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012–2013 (pp. 3–107). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sauvant, K. P., & Nolan, M. D. (2015). China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment and International Investment Law. Journal of International Economic Law, 18, 893–934.Google Scholar
  16. The Economist. (2013, October 26). The Second Wave.Google Scholar
  17. The Economist. (2015, March 28). Gone Shopping.Google Scholar
  18. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2017). China Going Global Investment Index 2017. Retrieved from www.eiu.com.
  19. UNCTAD. (2005). Case Study on Outward Foreign Investment by Russian Enterprises. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/Docs/c3em26d2a4_en.pdf.
  20. UNCTAD. (2015). World Investment Report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  21. UNCTAD. (2017). World Investment Report 2016: Investment and the Digital Economy. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  22. Wei, S., Xie, Z., & Zhang, X. (2017). From “Made in China” to “Innovated in China”: Necessity, Prospect, and Challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valeria Gattai
    • 1
  • Rajssa Mechelli
    • 2
  • Piergiovanna Natale
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Catholic University of the Sacred HeartMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations