Advertisement

Conclusion: ASEAN as a Successful Regional Organization? OIC as an Alternative to the Caliphate? Revisiting the Main Puzzles

  • Mujtaba Ali Isani
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I summarize the findings and revisit my main questions. The chapter submits that Muslims’ public opinion toward regional organizations might not everywhere be negative. In the case of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), confidence among Muslims in Malaysia and Indonesia is quite high. Hence, I argue that performance evaluations, rather than religious/regional identity or anti-Western attitudes, explain Muslim attitudes toward regional organizations. Regional differences in the attitudes of Muslims across the world represent a very compelling future puzzle. Additionally, I point toward the need to collect more data on the Organisation for Islamic Cooperation (OIC), as this institution might come closest to the concept of the Caliphate. How can we make sense of the findings of the dissertation? I argue that performance might have a large influence on Muslim citizens’ evaluations of international institutions; perhaps, Muslims only yearn for the Caliphate if they are disappointed in the current global order.

Keywords

ASEAN OIC Performance Muslim Attitudes 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2011). Engagement or entrapment? Scholarship and policymaking on Asian regionalism. International Studies Review, 13(1), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Akbarzadeh, S. (2013). Rejuvenating the organisation of Islamic cooperation. In OIC 2013: Proceedings of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation 2013 convention. Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.Google Scholar
  4. Baba, N. A. (1994). Organisation of Islamic conference: Theory and practice of pan-Islamic cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benny, G., & Abdullah, K. (2011). Indonesian perceptions and attitudes toward the ASEAN community. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(1), 39–67.Google Scholar
  6. Binder, L. (1995). Al-Ghazzali’s theory of Islamic government. The Muslim World, 45(3), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deutsch, K. W. (1957). Political community in the North Atlantic area. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Esposito, J. L., & Mogahed, D. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Hassan, M. (2017). Longing for the lost Caliphate: A transregional history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hayat, S. U. (2006). World Muslim unity efforts and the creation of the organization of the Islamic conference: An overview. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 43(1), 177.Google Scholar
  11. Hewstone, M. (1986). Understanding attitudes to the European community a socio-psychological study in four member states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, E. (1988). Al-Sanhuri and Islamic law: The place and significance of Islamic law in the life and work of ’Abd Al-Razzaq Ahmad Al-Sanhuri, Egyptian jurist and scholar, 1895–1971[I]. Arab Law Quarterly, 3(1), 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ihsanoglu, E. (2010). The Islamic world in the new century: The organisation of the Islamic conference. London: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Isani, M., & Silverman, D. (2016). Foreign policy attitudes toward Islamic actors an experimental approach. Political Research Quarterly, 69(3), 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamali, M. H. (2010). Constitutionalism and democracy: An Islamic perspective. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 2(1), 18.Google Scholar
  16. Khan, S. S. (2001). Reasserting international Islam: A focus on the organisation of the Islamic conference and other Islamic institutions. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, P. R. (2011). The emotional citizen: Emotion as a function of political sophistication. Political Psychology, 32(4), 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1983). Paranoia and the structure of powerlessness. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moinuddin, H. (1987). The charter of the Islamic conference and legal framework of economic co-operation among its member states: A study of the charter, the general agreement for economic, technical, and commercial co-operation and the Agreement for promotion, protection, and guarantee of investments among member states of the OIC. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Moravcsik, A. (2004). Is there a ‘democratic deficit’ in world politics? A framework for analysis. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 336–363.Google Scholar
  22. Moorthy, R., & Benny, G. (2012). Attitude towards community building in association of Southeast Asian nations. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moorthy, R., & Benny, G. (2013). Does public opinion count? Knowledge and support for an ASEAN community in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13(3), 399–423.Google Scholar
  24. Nischalke, T. I. (2000). Insights from ASEAN’s foreign policy co-operation: The ASEAN way, a real spirit or a phantom? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22(1), 89–112.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, C. (2012). State weakness and political values ramifications for the ASEAN community. In ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Rüland, J. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: Theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. The Pacific Review, 13(3), 421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanhuri, Abd al-Razzaq Aḥmad al-. (1926). Le Califat. Lyon: University of Lyon.Google Scholar
  28. Shalakany, A. (2001). Between identity and redistribution: Sanhuri, genealogy and the will to Islamise. Islamic Law and Society, 8(2), 201–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stepan, A. C., & Robertson, G. B. (2003). An ‘Arab’ more than a ‘Muslim’ democracy gap. Journal of Democracy, 14(3), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yousaf, N. (2005). Pakistan’s birth & Allama Mashraqi: Chronology & statements, period, 1947–1963. Liverpool: AMZ Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mujtaba Ali Isani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations