Advertisement

Data-Driven Human Rights Investigations

  • Alice Kohli
Chapter

Abstract

Journalists often have to rely on non-governmental organisations and their sources when they research human rights abuses in remote and dangerous environments. It is highly likely that such collaborations will increase in the future, due to the budget cuts for major investigations in many media outlets. In many ways, the techniques of NGOs, advocacy groups and other human rights fact-finders are similar to those of journalists. But to some extent they differ, for example when it comes to the underlying political agenda that many organisations follow. This chapter explores, what exactly human rights investigations entail, why this work is important for journalists and to what extent the developments of data journalism have reached human rights investigations. It will also give examples of successful data-driven investigations conducted by NGOs while at the same time pointing out the difficulties that arise in the special circumstances surrounding human rights fact-finding.

References

  1. Amnesty International, Benetech, and The Engine Room. (2016). DatNav: How to Navigate Digital Data for Human Rights Research. Retrieved from https://www.theengineroom.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/en-datnav-report_high-quality_web_.pdf.
  2. BankTrack. (n.d.). [Homepage]. Retrieved from https://www.banktrack.org/.
  3. Benetech. (n.d.). [Homepage]. Retrieved from https://benetech.org/.
  4. Bergsmo, M. (Ed.). (2013). Quality Control in Fact-Finding. Retrieved from http://www.toaep.org/ps-pdf/19-bergsmo.
  5. Hafiza Merkezi. (n.d.). [Homepage]. Retrieved from http://hafiza-merkezi.org/.
  6. Human Rights Data Analysis Group. (n.d.). [Homepage]. Retrieved from https://hrdag.org/.
  7. Huridocs. (n.d.). [Homepage]. Retrieved from https://www.huridocs.org/.
  8. Public Eye. (2016). Dirty Diesel. How Swiss Traders Flood Africa with Toxic Fuels. Retrieved from Public Eye website: https://www.publiceye.ch/fileadmin/files/documents/Rohstoffe/DirtyDiesel/PublicEye2016_DirtyDiesel_A-Public-Eye-Investigation.pdf.
  9. Publish What You Pay. (n.d.). [Homepage]. Retrieved from http://www.publishwhatyoupay.org/.
  10. Robertson, G. (2010). Human Rights Fact-Finding: Some Legal and Ethical Dilemmas. University College London Human Rights Review, 3, 15–43. Retrieved from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/human-rights/research/ucl-hrr/docs/hrreviewissue3/robertson.
  11. Syrian Archive. (n.d.). Syrian Archive. Curating Visual Documentation for Justice and Human Rights. Retrieved from https://syrianarchive.org.
  12. The Engine Room. (n.d.). [Homepage]. Retrieved from https://www.theengineroom.org/.
  13. Utmedlidze, I. (2013). Information Technology and Quality Control in Non-Criminal Justice Fact-Work. In M. Bergsmo (Ed.), Quality Control in Fact-Finding. Retrieved from http://www.toaep.org/ps-pdf/19-bergsmo.
  14. Widmann, N. (2017, March 21). Applying Machine Learning to Detect Judicial Bias in the Pacific Islands [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://huridocs.org/2017/03/applying-machine-learning-to-find-judicial-bias-in-the-pacific-islands/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Kohli
    • 1
  1. 1.Public EyeZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations