Advertisement

Interactivity to the Rescue

  • Johanna Fulda
Chapter

Abstract

As the news moved from print to digital media, dynamic, interactive content was seen as a key ingredient to higher reader engagement. Now after a few years of experience we learn that the “interactivity wherever possible” approach is not necessarily the way to go. Studies suggest that readers often do not notice, or do not care too much about hover/click/discover features inside graphics or charts—especially if the implementation is ragged. In this chapter I want to summarise the current research on interactivity—especially in the news context, to show what practitioners say about standards and the usefulness of interactives, and finally offer some rules of thumb for when and when not to use interactives.

References

  1. Aisch, G. (2016, September 13). Information+ Conference: Gregor Aisch [Video file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/182590214.
  2. Aisch, G. (2017, March 31). In Defense of Interactive Graphics [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.vis4.net/blog/posts/in-defense-of-interactive-graphics/.
  3. Baur, D. (2017, March 13). The Death of Interactive Infographics? [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@dominikus/the-end-of-interactive-visualizations-52c585dcafcb.
  4. Bertini, E., & Stefaner, M. (Producers). (2017, July 17). Datastories 102: Understanding Comics and Visual Storytelling with Scott McCloud [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://datastori.es/102-comics-and-visual-storytelling-with-scott-mccloud.
  5. Boy, J., Detienne, F., & Fekete, J. D. (2015). Storytelling in Information Visualizations: Does It Engage Users to Explore Data? In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1449–1458). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  6. Boy, J., Eveillard, L., Detienne, F., & Fekete, J. D. (2016). Suggested Interactivity: Seeking Perceived Affordances for Information Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 639–648.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burmester, M., Mast, M., Tille, R., & Weber, W. (2010, July). How Users Perceive and Use Interactive Information Graphics: An Exploratory Study. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2010 14th International Conference (pp. 361–368). London: IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. Chung, D. S. (2008). Interactive Features of Online Newspapers: Identifying Patterns and Predicting Use of Engaged Readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coddington, M. (2015). Clarifying Journalism’s Quantitative Turn: A Typology for Evaluating Data Journalism, Computational Journalism, and Computer-assisted Reporting. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 331–348.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dada, J. (2016). Engaging to Explore? An Online Experiment to Investigate the Impact of Interactivity in Data Visualizations. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Deuze, M. (1999). Journalism and the Web: An Analysis of Skills and Standards in an Online Environment. International Communication Gazette, 61(5), 373–390.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549299061005002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deuze, M. (2003). The Web and Its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dick, M. (2014). Interactive Infographics and News Values. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 490–506.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.841368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geidner, N., Pjesivac, I., Imre, I., Coman, I., & Yuran, D. (2015). The Role of Interactive Graphics in Reducing Misperceptions in the Electorate. Visual Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 133–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2015.1069195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Günther, E., & Scharkow, M. (2014). Recycled Media: An Automated Evaluation of News Outlets in the Twenty-First Century. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 524–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hermida, A. (2011). Mechanisms of Participation. In J. B. Singer (Ed.), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers (pp. 11–33). Malden, MA: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hermida, A., & Young, M. L. (2017). Finding the Data Unicorn: A Hierarchy of Hybridity in Data and Computational Journalism. Digital Journalism, 5(2), 159–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1162663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lorenz, M. (2010, June 29). Data-Driven Journalism: What Is There to Learn? (Stanford, June 2010) [Talk Slides]. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/mirkolorenz/datadriven-journalism-what-is-there-to-learn.
  20. Luyckx, D. (2017, February 9). 3 Ways to Make Data Visualisations and Interactives Work on Mobile. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.co.uk/skills/3-ways-to-make-data-visualisations-and-interactives-work-on-mobile/s7/a699519/.
  21. McAthy, R. (2012, August 1). Visual Journalism: Advice on Building Interactives and Engaging the Audience. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/tips-engage-the-audience-with-interactive-journalism/s2/a549988/.
  22. Milatz, M. (2013). Moving Graphics: The Effects of Interactive Infographics on Media Users’ Recall Accuracy. Unpublished master’s thesis.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, M. (2016, August 12). The “Bart and Lisa” Theory of Information Design. Retrieved from https://www.fastcodesign.com/3066148/the-bart-and-lisa-theory-of-information-design.
  24. Rogers, S., Cairo, A., & Daniels, M. (2017, March 31). News Lab Data Visualization Round Up: March 2017—With Special Guest, Matt Daniels [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqLAxpumENs.
  25. Schwabish, J. (Producer). (2017, June 6). PolicyViz Episode #89: Priya Krishnakumar [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://policyviz.com/podcast/episode-89-priya-krishnakumar/.
  26. Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated Visibility: Secondary Gatekeeping in a Shared Media Space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., & Curry, A. L. (2016). The Presence and Use of Interactive Features on News Websites. Digital Journalism, 4(3), 339–358.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.104298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tse, A. (2016, March 21). Why We Are Doing Fewer Interactives [talk slides]. Retrieved from https://github.com/archietse/malofiej-2016/blob/master/tse-malofiej-2016-slides.pdf.
  30. Wojdynski, B. W. (2015). Interactive Data Graphics and Information Processing. Journal of Media Psychology, 27(1), 11–21.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yi, J. S., ah Kang, Y., & Stasko, J. (2007). Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), 1224–1231.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2007.70515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Young, M. L., Hermida, A., & Fulda, J. (2017). What Makes for Great Data Journalism? Journalism Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1270171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao, L., & Huang, T. (2013). Experimental Research on the Effectiveness of Animated Instruction. In 3rd International Conference on Multimedia Technology (ICMT-13) (pp. 562–569). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanna Fulda
    • 1
  1. 1.Data Visualisation Design and DevelopmentVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations