Digitally Mediated Memory and the Spanish Civil War

  • Paul Spence
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict book series


Spence provides a much-needed overview of the ways in which digital mediation influences both the emerging field of Memory Studies, and its object of study, memory formation. Using the Spanish Civil War as a case study, and drawing on disparate areas of digital theory and practice, the author explores how the study of contested memory is transformed in new media landscapes. Spence contrasts different digitally informed methodological approaches, and explores challenges in integrating these into a consolidated research toolkit connecting the work of archivists, historians, media theorists and researchers from Memory Studies and the Digital Humanities.


  1. Anderson, Sheila. “What Are Research Infrastructures?” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 7, no. 1–2 (2013): 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, Sheila, and Tobias Blanke. “Infrastructure as Intermeditation: From Archives to Research Infrastructures.” Journal of Documentation 71, no. 6 (2015): 1183–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aouragh, Miriyam. “Confined Offline: Traversing Online Palestinian Mobility Through the Prism of the Internet.” Mobilities 6, no. 3 (2011): 375–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assmann, Jan. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique 65 (1995): 125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbecho, Lidia Bocanegra, and Maucizio Toscano. “The Spanish Republican Exile: Identity, Belonging and Memory in the Digital World.” In Cultural Heritage in a Changing World, edited by Karol Jan Borowiecki, Neil Forbes, and Antonella Fresa, 237–53.Google Scholar
  6. Bearman, David. “Archival Strategies.” The American Archivist 58, no. 4 (1995): 380–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaulieu, Anne, and Sarah de Rijcke Bas van Heur “Authority and Expertise in New Sites of Knowledge Production.” In Virtual Knowledge: Experimenting in the Humanities and the Social Sciences, edited by Paul Wouters, Anne Beaulieu, Andrea Scharnhorst, and Sally Wyatt, 25–56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, David, ed. Understanding Digital Humanities. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
  9. Blanke, Tobias, Leonardo Candela, Mark Hedges, Mike Priddy, and Fabio Simeoni. “Deploying General-Purpose Virtual Research Environments for Humanities Research. Philosophical Transactions A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 368 (2010), 3813–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanke, Tobias, and Conny Kristel. “Integrating Holocaust Research.” Journal of Humanities & Arts Computing: A Journal of Digital Humanities 7, no. 1–2 (2013): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. Digital Humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  12. Bush, Vannevar, “As We May Think.” The Atlantic (1945) [online]: Accessed 25 September 2015.
  13. Dijck, José van. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, Stuart. “Praxes of ‘The Human’ and ‘The Digital’: Spatial Humanities and the Digitization of Place.” GeoHumanities 3, no. 1 (2017), 88–107.Google Scholar
  15. Eiroa, Matilde. “La Guerra Civil Española en la actualidad cibermediática.” Studia Historica: Historia Contemporánea 32 (2014): 357–69.Google Scholar
  16. Erraskin Agirrezabala, Mikel, and Rosa Martínez Rodríguez. “Realms of Memory and the Recovery of the Historical Memory of the Spanish Civil War and Franco’s Dictatorship (1936–2012).” In Challenging History in the Museum: International Perspectives, edited by Jenny Kidd, Sam Cairns, Alex Drago and Amy Ryall. Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge: And the Discourse on Language. Princeton, NJ: Vintage, 1982.Google Scholar
  18. Garde-Hansen, Joanne, Andrew Hoskins, and Anna Reading, eds. Save As… Digital Memories. Basingstoke; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Guldi, Jo. “What Is the Spatial Turn?” Spatial Humanities (2011),
  20. Haigh, Thomas. “We Have Never Been Digital.” Communications of the ACM 57, no. 9 (2014): 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hitchcock, Tim. “Academic History Writing and its Disconnects.” Journal of Digital Humanities (2012),
  22. ———. Confronting the Digital: Or How Academic History Writing Lost the Plot. Cultural and Social History 10, no. 1 (2013): 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoskins, Andrew. “Media, Memory, Metaphor: Remembering and the Connective Turn.” Parallax 17, no. 4 (2011): 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. “Anachronisms of Media, Anachronisms of Memory: From Collective Memory to a New Memory Ecology.” In On Media Memory: Collective Memory in a New Media Age, edited by Motti Neiger, Oren Meyers, and Eyal Zandberg, 278–88. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: AIAA, 2012.Google Scholar
  25. Huyssen, Andreas. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Lepore, Jill. “Can the Internet Be Archived?” New Yorker, 26 January 2015,
  27. Lévy, Pierre. The Semantic Sphere: Computation, Cognition and Information Economy. London: ISTE Ltd., 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, Alan. Theses on the Epistemology of the Digital: Advice for the Cambridge Centre for Digital Knowledge, 2014,
  29. Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations 26 (1989): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parikka, Jussi. “Archives in Media Theory: Material Media Archaeology and Digital Humanities.” In Understanding Digital Humanities, ed. David M. Berry, 85–104. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. What is Media Archaeology? Cambridge: Policy Press, 2012b.Google Scholar
  32. Presner, Todd. “Critical Theory and the Mangle of Digital Humanities.” In Patrik Svensson and David Theo Goldberg, Between Humanities and the Digital, 55–67.Google Scholar
  33. Reading, Anna. “The London Bombings: Mobile Witnessing, Mortal Bodies and Globital Time.” Memory Studies 4, no. 3 (2011): 298–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. Gender and Memory in the Globital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
  35. Svensson, Patrik. “The Humanistiscope: Exploring the Situatedness of Humanities Infrastructure.” In Between Humanities and the Digital, ed. Patrik Svensson and David Theo Goldberg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  36. Svensson, Patrik, and David Theo Goldberg, eds. Between Humanities and the Digital. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  37. Tanner, Simon. “Managing Containers, Content and Context in Digital Preservation: Towards a 2020 Vision.” Archiving (2006): 19–23.Google Scholar
  38. Underberg, Natalie, and Elayne Zorn. Digital Ethnography: Anthropology, Narrative, and New Media. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  39. Unsworth, John. Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common, and How Might Our Tools Reflect This? (2000),
  40. Zephyr, Frank. “Spatial History as Scholarly Practice.” In Patrik Svensson and David Theo Goldberg, Between Humanities and the Digital, 411–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Spence
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations