Hybrid Dandyism: European Woolen Fabric in East Asia

  • Kyunghee Pyun
Part of the East Asian Popular Culture book series (EAPC)


Although East Asia is known for its production of fine silk fabrics and also as a major exporter of luxurious textiles, it gradually consumed European fabrics in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Using extant costume and textile objects in the late nineteenth century, this essay introduces types of European woolen fabrics. Imported woolen fabrics in Japan, predominantly British in the beginning, were eventually being replaced by those produced in Australia and other parts of the world in the early twentieth century. Literary descriptions, news articles, advertising images, and fashion magazines are used as primary sources along with surviving uniforms and dresses. The manufacturing of woolen fabrics in Japan and Korea from the 1920s to the 1940s demonstrated how a foreign luxury became a necessity in a war-obsessed colonial government. Along with mass production of cotton, the making of woolen fabrics became part of an essential military enterprise and a monopoly of the Empire of Japan. This essay discusses how the intellectuals who had studied abroad and the social elite who had positions in public service adopted the fashionable styling of woolen clothing, and why this trend of hybrid dandyism continued after WWII in Korea and Japan.


Hybridity Luxury Monopoly Colonialism Dandyism 


  1. Amies, Hardy. “The Englishman’s Suit.” RSA Journal 140, no. 5434 (1992): 780–787.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczyk, Regina Lee. “Styling Synthetics: DuPont’s Marketing of Fabrics and Fashions in Postwar America.” The Business History Review 80, no. 3 (2006): 485–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. “Rule-Following in Dandyism: ‘Style’ as an Overcoming of ‘Rule’ and ‘Structure,’” Modern Language Review 90, no. 2 (1995): 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bracken, Gregory. ed. Asian Cities: Colonial to Global. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cambridge, Nicolas. “Cherry-Picking Sartorial Identities in Cherry-Blossom Land: Uniforms and Uniformity in Japan.” Journal of Design History 24, no. 2 (2011): 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, Hyaeweol. Gender and Mission Encounters in Korea. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, Donald N., ed. Missionary Photography in Korea: Encountering the West Through Christianity. New York: The Korea Society, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. “Cold Weather Clothing for Korea,” The British Medical Journal 2, no. 4745 (1951): 1457–1458.Google Scholar
  9. Finnane, Antonia. “Department Stores and the Commodification of Culture: Artful Marketing in a Globalizing World.” In Production, Destruction and Connection, 1750–Present: Shared Transformations?, edited by John McNeill and Kenneth Pomeranz, 137–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  10. Fulton, Bruce, and Young-min Kwon, eds. Modern Korean Fiction: An Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. Geum, Gi-sook 금기숙, et al. Hyeondae paesyeon 100-nyeon 현대패션 100년 [Modern Fashion One Hundred Years]. Seoul: Gyomunsa, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. Hanscom, Christopher P. “Modernism and Hysteria in One Day in the Life of the Author, Mr. Kubo.” In The Real Modern: Literary Modernism and the Crisis of Representation in Colonial Korea, 59–77. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2013.Google Scholar
  13. Hatsuda, Tōru 初田亨, Hyakkaten no tanjō 百貨店の誕生 [Birth of the Department Store]. Tōkyō: Chikuma Shobō, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Henry, Todd A. Assimilating Seoul: Japanese Rule and the Politics of Public Space in Colonial Korea, 1910–1945. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  15. Hunter, Janet. “Technology Transfer and the Gendering of Communications Work: Meiji Japan in Comparative Historical Perspective.” Social Science Japan Journal 14, no. 1 (2011): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauster, Martina. “Walter Benjamin’s Myth of the ‘Flâneur’.” Modern Language Review 102, no. 1 (2007): 139–156.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, Ann Sung-hi. Yi Kwang-su and Modern Korean Literature: Mujong. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, Jungtaek. “The Birth of Modern Fashion in Korea: Sartorial Transition Between Hanbok and Yangbok and Colonial Modernity of Dress Culture.” PhD dissertation, SOAS University of London, 2015.Google Scholar
  19. ———. “The Birth of Modern Fashion in Korea: Sartorial Transition between Hanbok and Yangbok Through Production, Mediation and Consumption.” International Journal of Fashion Studies 4, no. 2 (2017): 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynn, Hyung Gu. “Fashioning Modernity: Changing Meanings of Clothing in Colonial Korea.” Journal of International and Area Studies 11, no. 3 (2004): 75–93.Google Scholar
  21. McDermott, Hiroko T. “Meiji Kyoto Textile Art and Takashimaya.” Monumenta Nipponica 65, no. 1 (2010): 37–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, Harriet. “Japan’s Wool Supply and the Dispute with Australia,” Far Eastern Survey 5, no. 16 (1936): 172–173.Google Scholar
  23. Nakagawa, Keiichirō, and Henry Rosovsky. “The Case of the Dying Kimono: The Influence of Changing Fashions on the Development of the Japanese Woolen Industry.” The Business History Review 37, no. 1/2 (1963): 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nettl, Peter. “Some Economic Aspects of the Wool Trade.” Oxford Economic Papers 4, no. 2 (1952): 172–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ogawa, Morihiro, ed. Art of the Samurai: Japanese Arms and Armor, 1156–1868. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2009.Google Scholar
  26. Slade, Toby. “Japanese Sartorial Modernity.” In Berg Encyclopedia of World Dress and Fashion: East Asia, edited by John E. Vollmer. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2010.
  27. Utagawa, Sadahide. Russians Raising Sheep for Wool. 1860. Color Woodblock Print, Gift from Emily Crane Chadbourne, Acc. No. 1926.1741. Art Institute, Chicago.
  28. Wolin, Richard. “‘Modernity’: The Peregrinations of a Contested Historiographical Concept.” American Historical Review 116, no. 3 (2011): 741–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wongsurawat, Wasana. Sites of Modernity: Asian Cities in the Transitory Moments of Trade, Colonialism, and Nationalism. New York: Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
  30. Wrigley, Richard. “Unreliable Witness: The Flâneur as Artist and Spectator of Art in Nineteenth-Century Paris.” Oxford Art Journal 39, no. 2 (2016): 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yi Kwangsu 이광수, Yi Kwangsu jeonjip 이광수 전집 李光洙全集 [Anthology of Yi Kwangsu’s Writings]. Vol. 20. Seoul: Samjungdang, 1961.Google Scholar
  32. Yōmō shigen to Chōsen no menyō 羊毛資源と朝鮮の緬羊 [Woolen Materials and Ships of Joseon]. Seoul: Chōsen Shokusan Josei Zaidan, 1940.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyunghee Pyun
    • 1
  1. 1.Fashion Institute of TechnologyNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations