Advertisement

Breaking through the East-European Ceiling: Minority Co-production and the New Symbolic Economy of Small-Market Cinemas

  • Petr Szczepanik
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave European Film and Media Studies book series (PEFMS)

Abstract

This chapter combines questions about the structural position that minority co-production occupies within the Czech screen industry ecology and about local producers as its key agency. It starts with a picture of minority co-production vis-à-vis other international “production technologies” and with reconstructing producers’ cautionary discourse on majority co-production. After providing basic structural industry and policy analysis, it switches to day-to-day collaborative processes as seen by the local independent producers, focusing on their strategic thinking and lived realities. It asks about the role of knowledge transfer and symbolic capital accumulation on one hand, and about the new power hierarchies and barriers emerging from such transnational production contexts on the other.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation [project reference 17-13616S] and by the European Regional Development Fund [project “Creativity and Adaptability as Conditions of the Success of Europe in an Interrelated World”, No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000734].

References

  1. Baltruschat, Doris. 2010. Global Media Ecologies: Networked Production in Film and Television. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berčík, Pavel. 2012. Půjčka za oplátku aneb Počátky minoritních koprodukcí v Česku. Iluminace 24 (4): 103–109.Google Scholar
  3. Bergfelder, Tim. 2005. National, Transnational or Supranational Cinema? Rethinking European Film Studies. Media, Culture & Society 27 (3): 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bondebjerg, Ib, Eva Novrup Redvall, Rasmus Helles, et al. 2017. Transnational European Television Drama: Production, Genres and Audiences. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Bruun, Hanne. 2016. The Qualitative Interview in Media Production Studies. In Advancing Media Production Research: Shifting Sites, Methods, and Politics, ed. Chris Paterson, David Lee, Anamik Saha, and Anna Zoellner, 131–144. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Caldwell, John T. 2008. Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EEIP. 2017. Ekonomická analýza českého filmového průmyslu. Praha: EEIP.Google Scholar
  9. Ernst, Dieter, and Linsu Kim. 2002. Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capability Formation. Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1417–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grece, Christian. 2016. How Do Films Circulate on VOD Services and in Cinemas in the European Union? Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  11. Halle, Randall. 2008. German Film after Germany: Toward a Transnational Aesthetic. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  12. Havens, Timothy. 2014. Towards a Structuration Theory of Media Intermediaries. In Making Media Work: Cultures of Management in the Entertainment Industries, ed. Derek Johnson, Derek Kompare, and Avi Santo, 39–63. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jäckel, Anne. 2003. European Film Industries. London: BFI.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, Deborah, and Judith K. Pringle. 2015. Unmanageable Inequalities: Sexism in the Film Industry. The Sociological Review 63 (1): 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanzler, Martin. 2008. The Circulation of European Co-productions and Entirely National Films in Europe (2001 to 2007). Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  16. Lauzen, Martha M. 2018. The Celluloid Ceiling: Behind-the-Scenes Employment of Women on the Top 100, 250, and 500 Films of 2017. https://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2017_Celluloid_Ceiling_Report.pdf.
  17. Liz, Mariana. 2014. From European Co-productions to the Euro-Pudding. In The Europeanness of European Cinema: Identity, Meaning, Globalization, ed. Mary Harrod, Mariana Liz, and Alissa Timoshkina, 73–85. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, Toby, et al. 2005. Global Hollywood 2. London: BFI, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Morawetz, Norbert, Jane Hardy, Colin Haslam, and Keith Randle. 2007. Finance, Policy and Industrial Dynamics: The Rise of Co-productions in the Film Industry. Industry and Innovation 14 (4): 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olsberg, S.P.I. 2006. Economic Impact Study of the Film Industry in the Czech Republic. London: Olsberg SPI.Google Scholar
  21. Strnad, Pavel. 2000. Transformace české kinematografie v letech 1989–1999. MA thesis, FAMU, Praha.Google Scholar
  22. Szczepanik, Petr. 2016a. Najít si svou skupinu diváků na co nejvíce místech světa Rozhovor s Viktorem Taušem. Iluminace 28 (1): 129–148.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2016b. Transnational Crews and the Post-socialist Precarity: Globalizing Screen Media Labor in Prague. In Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor, ed. Michael Curtin and Kevin Sanson, 88–103. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2018. Post-socialist Producer: Production Culture of a Small-Nation Media Industry. Critical Studies in Television 13 (2, Summer): 207–226.Google Scholar
  25. Szczepanik, Petr, et al. 2015. Studie vývoje českého hraného kinematografického díla [A Study of Czech Feature Film Development]. Praha: Státní fond kinematografie. www.fondkinematografie.cz/assets/media/publikace/studie_vyvoj_hrany_final.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Szczepanik
    • 1
  1. 1.Charles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations