Advertisement

European Co-productions in a Digital Single Market: EUtopia or Dystopia?

  • Nina Vindum Rasmussen
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave European Film and Media Studies book series (PEFMS)

Abstract

The European Commission’s Digital Single Market strategy has sparked heated debate in the film industry. The key ambition of the strategy is to break down national silos online and facilitate cross-border access to digital content. The Commission’s vision runs counter to the way that co-productions are financed in Europe, and the film industry therefore warns that a DSM will rip up their entire business model. This chapter examines the arguments on both sides of the debate by employing Fairclough and Fairclough’s Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students (London: Routledge, 2012). The results show that the disagreement primarily arises over whether or not the existing film model can adapt to the rapid technological changes. The debate also echoes earlier quarrels over the film industry’s inherent tension between commerce and creativity.

References

  1. Aft, Rob H., and Charles-Eduard Renault. 2011. From Script to Screen: The Importance of Copyright in the Distribution of Films. World Intellectual Property Organization. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/copyright/950/wipo_pub_950.pdf.
  2. Ansip, Andrus. 2015. Getting the Digital Single Market Off the Ground: The Next Steps Forward. European Commission [blog post], November 18. Accessed January 7, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/ansip/blog/getting-digital-single-market-ground-next-steps-forward_en.
  3. Barraclough, Leo. 2015. European Film Industry Focuses on Twin Threats: Netflix and Digital Single Market. Variety, August 30. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://variety.com/2015/digital/global/european-film-industry-focuses-on-twin-threats-netflix-and-digital-single-market-1201581507.
  4. Bartsch, Marlen. 2014. The Return of the Cultural Exception and Its Impact on International Agreements. Global Media Journal 4 (1). Accessed January 7, 2018. https://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbt_derivate_00029860/GMJ7_Bartsch_final.pdf.
  5. Blaney, Martin. 2015. EC’s Andrus Ansip Talks DSM Plans. Screen Daily, November 19. Accessed January 7, 2018. https://www.screendaily.com/news/ecs-andrus-ansip-talks-dsm-plans/5097081.article.
  6. Bondebjerg, Ib, and Eva N. Redvall. 2015. Introduction: Mediated Cultural Encounters in Europe. In European Cinema and Television: Cultural Policy and Everyday Life, ed. I. Bondebjerg, E.N. Redvall, and A. Higson, 1–22. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera Blázquez, Francisco Javier, Maja Cappello, Christian Grece, and Sophie Valais. 2015. Territoriality and Its Impact on the Financing of Audiovisual Works. IRIS Plus. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  8. De Vinck, Sophie, and Caroline Pauwels. 2015. Beyond Borders and into the Digital Era: Future-proofing European-level Film Support Schemes. In European Cinema and Television: Cultural Policy and Everyday Life, ed. I. Bondebjerg, E.N. Redvall, and A. Higson, 102–123. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. 2010. Guidelines on Vertical Restraints [Commission Notice]. Brussels: SEC(2010) 411.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2015a. Antitrust: Commission Sends Statement of Objections on Cross-Border Provisions of Pay-TV Services Available in UK and Ireland [Press Release], July 23. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5432_en.htm.
  11. ———. 2015b. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. Brussels: Communication of May 6. COM(2015) 192 final.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2015c. Digital Single Market Strategy: European Commission Agrees Areas for Action [Press Release], March 25. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-4653_en.htm.
  13. ———. 2015d. Questions and Answers—Digital Single Market Strategy [Fact Sheet], May 6. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-4920_da.htm.
  14. ———. 2015e. Towards a Modern, More European Copyright Framework. Brussels: Communication of December 9, 2015. COM(2015) 626 final.Google Scholar
  15. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Finney, Angus. 2016. The State of European Cinema: A New Dose of Reality. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, Eran. 2010. Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Spirit of Networks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuchs, Christian. 2011. Foundations of Critical Media and Information Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hesmondhalgh, David. 2013. The Cultural Industries. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo. 2015. Copyright Licensing and the EU Digital Single Market Strategy. In Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property and High Technology, ed. R.D. Blair and D.D. Sokol, 2017. New York: Cambridge University Press. LSE Legal Studies Working Paper 19/2015. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2697178.
  21. IVF, FIAPF, IFTA, and MPA. 2015. Case Studies on the Financing and Distribution of Recent European Films & Television Series. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://www.ivf-video.org/new/public/media/FIAPF_IFTA_IVF_MPA_Case_Studies_July_24_2015.pdf.
  22. Jäckel, Anne. 2003. European Film Industries. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kanzler, Martin, Susan Newman-Baudais, and André Lange. 2008. The Circulation of European Co-productions and Entirely National Films in Europe, 2001–2007. European Audiovisual Observatory. Accessed November 7, 2017. http://www.obs.coe.int/documents/205595/452480/Coproduction+Krakow+2008+EN.pdf/f3371c64-a1a1-48b9-a0e0-f74ba4a936f7.
  25. OECD. 2013. Competition Issues in Television and Broadcasting. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/TV-and-broadcasting2013.pdf.
  26. Oxera and O&O. 2016. The Impact of Cross-Border Access to Audiovisual Content on EU Consumers. Oxford: Oxera, Oliver & Ohlbaum. Accessed January 7, 2018. https://www.oxera.com/getmedia/5c575114-e2de-4387-a2de-1ca64d793b19/Cross-border-report-(final).pdf.aspx.
  27. Puppis, Manuel, Seamus Simpson, and Hilde Van den Bulck. 2016. Contextualising European Media Policy in the Twenty-First Century. In European Media Policy for the Twenty-First Century: Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future, ed. S. Simpson, M. Puppis, and H. Van den Bulck, 1–19. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rasmussen, Nina V. 2016. Unpublished interview with Anders Kjærhauge. June 2016, Zentropa offices, Hvidovre.Google Scholar
  29. Roxborough, Scott. 2015. Europe Unveils Plans for Digital Single Market. The Hollywood Reporter, May 6. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/europe-unveils-digital-single-market-793781.
  30. Ryan, Michael. 2016. The EU’s Digital Single Market Strategy Is Regulatory Hubris That Will Damage Europe’s Audiovisual Production. Politico, June 16. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://www.politico.eu/sponsored-content/the-eus-digital-single-market-strategy-is-regulatory-hubris-that-will-damage-europes-audiovisual-production.
  31. Tavernier, Bertrand. 2015. [Letter to Andrus Ansip]. Society of Audiovisual Authors (SAA), June 29. Accessed January 7, 2018. http://www.saa-authors.eu/file/85/download.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Vindum Rasmussen
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations