Advertisement

Motivational and Math Anxiety Perspective for Mathematical Learning and Learning Difficulties

  • Elke BatenEmail author
  • Silvia Pixner
  • Annemie Desoete
Chapter

Abstract

Studies on the predictors of mathematical learning and learning difficulties have been receiving growing attention. It is well established in the literature that IQ is a powerful predictor of several psychosocial outcomes, including school achievement. Other well-consolidated literature shows that cognitive–motivational effects exist but are rather small. There seems to be a big interaction between interest and specific knowledge in a domain (expertise). Variance is confounded. In this chapter, motivation and math anxiety are described within the opportunity–propensity (O-P) model including antecedent, opportunity, and propensity indicators to predict mathematical accuracy and fluency. Analyses on secondary data using this O-P model revealed that motivation as a propensity factor accounted for 10% of unique variance in addition to other predictors. Motivation and engagement were stronger predictors from kindergarten till second grade than from third till sixth grade. In addition, math anxiety might be considered a moderator of the relationship between mathematical achievement and motivation. Aside from acute effects, math anxiety might cause long-term negative impairments in mathematical performance that are kept up by a negative approach to mathematics and resulting avoidance behavior.

Keywords

Motivation Math anxiety Opportunities Propensities Mathematics Learning difficulties 

References

  1. Arkin, R. M., Kolditz, M., & Kolditz, K. K. (1983). Attributions of the test-anxious student: Self-assessments in the classroom. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(2), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baten, E., & Desoete, A. (2016). Motivation and well-being in (a)typical numerical skills. Poster (received the Jeannette Klingner award) at the 40th Annual IARLD Conference (28–30 June 2016), Austin: Texas.Google Scholar
  5. Beilock, S. L., & Willingham, D. T. (2014). Math anxiety: Can teachers help students reduce it? American Educator, 38, 28–32.Google Scholar
  6. Brownlee, J., & Bertelsen, D. (2008). Developing relational epistemology through relational pedagogy. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs. Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 405–422). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes, J. P., & Miller, C. D. (2006). The relative importance of predictors of math and science achievement : An opportunity-propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 599–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrnes, J. P., & Miller, C. D. (2016). The growth of mathematics and reading skills in segregated and diverse schools: An opportunity-propensity analysis of a national database. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceulemans, A. (2014). Small numbers and numerical interaction: The building blocks of early numerical competencies. Unpublished PhD thesis, Gent, Belgium: Ghent University.Google Scholar
  10. Ceulemans, A., Titeca, D., Loeys, T., Hoppenbrouwers, K., Rousseau, S., & Desoete, A. (2014). The sense of small number discrimination: The predictive value in infancy and toddlerhood for numerical competencies in kindergarten. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 150–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., et al. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chinn, S. (2009). Mathematics anxiety in secondary students in England. Dyslexia, 15, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Claessens, A., & Engel, M. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115(6).Google Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Boston: Springer US.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Desoete, A. (2008). Co-morbidity in mathematical learning disabilities: Rule or exception? The Open Rehabilitation Journal, 1(1), 15–26.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943700801010015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desoete, A. (2014). Cognitive predictors of mathematical abilities and disabilities. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 899–914). Oxford: Medicine UK.Google Scholar
  17. Desoete, A. (2015). Predictive indicators for mathematical learning disabilities/dyscalculia in kindergarten children. In S. Chinn (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of dyscalculia and mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 90–100). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Desoete, A., & Baten, E. (2017). Indicators for a specific learning disorder in mathematics or dyscalculia in toddlers and in kindergarten children. Belgian Journal of Paediatrics, 19(2), 117–120.Google Scholar
  19. Desoete, A., Praet, M., Titeca, D., & Ceulemans, A. (2013). Cognitive phenotype of mathematical learning disabilities: What can we learn from siblings? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 404–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowker, A. (2015). Individual differences in arithmetical abilities. The componential nature of arithmetic. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 862–878). Oxford: Medicine UK.Google Scholar
  21. Duncan, G., & Magnuson, K. (2009). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention and behavior problems. Presented at the Russel Sage Foundation conference on Social Inequality and Educational Outcomes, November 19–20.Google Scholar
  22. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428;  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.supp (Supplemental).
  23. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garon-Carrier, G., Boivin, M., Guay, F., Kovas, Y., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J. P., et al. (2016). Intrinsic motivation and achievement in mathematics in elementary school: A longitudinal investigation of their association. Child Development, 87(1), 165–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gifford, S., & Rockliffe, F. (2012). Mathematics difficulties: Does one approach fit all? Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jansen, B. R. J., Louwerse, J., Straatemeier, M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Klinkenberg, S., & Van der Mass, H. L. J. (2013). The influence of experiencing success in math on math anxiety, perceived math competence, and math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Judge, T., & Robbins, S. (2013). Motivation concepts. In Organizational behavior (pp. 201–238). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  29. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kriegbaum, K., Jansen, M., & Spinath, B. (2015). Motivation: A predictor of PISA’s mathematical competence beyond intelligence and prior test achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 140–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krinzinger, H., Kaufmann, L., & Willmes, K. (2009). Math anxiety and math ability in early primary school years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 206–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lens, W., Vansteenkiste, M., & Matos, L. (2008). Motivation: Quantity and quality matter.Google Scholar
  33. Lu, L., Weber, H. S., Spinath, F. M., & Shi, J. (2011). Predicting school achievement from cognitive and non-cognitive variables in a Chinese sample of elementary school children. Intelligence, 39(2–3), 130–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maloney, E. A., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Math anxiety: Who has it, why it develops, and how to guard against it. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Middleton, J. A., Jansen, A., & Goldin, G. A. (2017). Motivation. In G. A. Goldin, M. S. Hannula, E. Heyd-Metzuyanim, A. Jansen, R. Kaasila, S. Lutovac, P. Di Martino, F. Morselli, J. A. Middleton, M. Pantziara, & Q. Zhang, (Eds.), (2016). Attitudes, beliefs, motivation and identity in mathematics education. An overview of the field and future directions (pp. 17–23).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32811-9. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-32811-9.pdf Google Scholar
  36. Milyavskaya, M., & Koestner, R. (2011). Psychological needs, motivation, and well-being: A test of self-determination theory across multiple domains. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 387–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, A. M., Rudig, N. O., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2015). Affect, motivation, working memory, and mathematics. (pp. 918–936). In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 917–936). Oxford: Medicine UK.Google Scholar
  38. Moreno, J. A., Gonzalez-Cutre, D., Sicilia, A., & Spray, C. M. (2010). Motivation in the exercise setting: Integrating constructs from the approach-avoidance achievement goal framework and self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(6), 542–550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ntoumanis, N. (2001). Empirical links between achievement goal theory and self-determination theory in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(6), 397–409.  https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101300149357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pieters, S., Roeyers, H., Rosseel, Y., Van Waelvelde, H., & Desoete, A. (2015). Identifying subtypes among children with developmental coordination disorder and mathematical learning disabilities, using model-based clustering. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 83–95.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413491288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Praet, M., Titeca, D., Ceulemans, A., & Desoete, A. (2013). Language in the prediction of arithmetics in kindergarten and grade 1. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 90–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shores, M. L., & Shannon, D. M. (2007). The effects of self-regulation, motivation, anxiety, and attributions on mathematics achievement for fifth and sixth grade students. School Science and Mathematics, 107, 225–236.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb18284.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 97–110.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2010). Detecting children with arithmetic disabilities from kindergarten: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study on the role of preparatory arithmetic abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 250–268.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409345011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., et al. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Petegem, S., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2015). Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory. Child Development, 86(3), 903–918.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vanbinst, K., Ghesquière, P., & De Smedt, B. (2015). Does numerical processing uniquely predict first graders’ future development of single-digit arithmetic? Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 671–688.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zakaria, E., & Nordin, N. M. (2008). The effects of math anxiety on matriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4, 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao, N., Valcke, M., Desoete, A., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2012). The quadratic relationship between socioeconomic status and learning performance in China by multilevel analysis: Implications for policies to foster education equity. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 412–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao, N. N., Valcke, M., Desoete, A., Verhaeghe, J., & Xu, K. (2011). Multilevel analysis on predicting mathematics performance in Chinese primary schools: Implications for practice. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20, 503–520.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental Clinical and Health PsychologyUniversity of GhentGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Institut for Psychology, Department for Psychology and Medical SciencesUniversity for Health Sciences, Medical Information and Technique (UMIT)Hall in TirolAustria
  3. 3.Artevelde University CollegeGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations