Advertisement

Mathematical Learning and Its Difficulties in Australia

  • Robert A. ReeveEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reviews current perspectives on math learning difficulties in Australia. It presents an overview of Australia’s math performance ranking on several international indices. It describes state-by-state differences in definitions of MLD, assessment approaches, and support offered to students with MLD. Furthermore, it describes limitations in many professional training programs in facilitating an understanding of MLD and dyscalculia and highlights cases where professional training is based on contemporary educational neuroscience research. The chapter reviews state-by-state math curricula and suggests they tend to be more pragmatic than informed by theory. Insofar as theory is articulated, it is usually in the context of Piagetian or Vygotskian theory, rather than contemporary educational neuroscience. Moreover, many teaching practices recommended in curricula documents are arguably aligned with embodied cognition theory, although this is not mentioned in the documents. It is noted that some best practice training programs are aware of the DSM-V’s definition of specific learning disabilities and dyscalculia, as well as contemporary research on MLD. The chapter concludes with a review of recent Australian math neurocognition research that is slowly being incorporated into math educational practice.

Keywords

International math ranking Definitions of MLD Professional training Theory informing math curricula Math developmental neurocognition research 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AUSPELD. (2015). Understanding learning difficulties: A practical guide. Available from http://auspeld.org.au/resources
  3. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (AAMT). (1997). Policy on numeracy education in schools. Adelaide, Australia: AAMT.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Capital Territory: Education and Training. (2013). Taskforce on Students with Learning Difficulties: Final Report. http://www.det.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/483819/taskforce-learning-difficultiesFAweb.pdf
  5. Australian Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2017). Mathematics – Australian curriculum. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Content_for_Foundation_-_Learning_area_content_descriptions.pdf
  6. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). National Assessment Program Literacy and numeracy. http://www.nap.edu.au/_resources/NAPLAN_2013_National_Report.
  7. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). Annual Report 2015–2016. www.acara.edu.au/docs/default-source/corporate-publications/acara-2015-16-annual-report.pdf?sfvrsn=2
  8. Australian Senate Stansding Committee on Education and Employment. (2016). http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Education_and_Employment
  9. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Butterworth, B. (2003). The dyscalculia screener. London: NferNelson.Google Scholar
  11. Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetic abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.00374.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Real math building blocks. Easton Commons: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Education Services Australia. (2016). https://www.esa.edu.au/
  15. Elkins, J. (2001). Learning disabilities in Australia in research and global perspectives in learning disabilities. In D. P. Hallahan & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Essay in honor of William M. Cruickshank (pp. 181–195). New Yory: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Gelman, R., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Number and language: How are they related? Trends Cognitive Science, 9, 6–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray, S. A., & Reeve, R. A. (2014). Preschoolers’ dot enumeration abilities are markers of their arithmetic competence. PLoS One, 9(4), e94428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray, S. A., & Reeve, R. A. (2016). Number-specific and general cognitive markers of preschoolers’ math ability profiles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Learning differences convention. (n.d.). http://www.learningdifferenceconvention.com/
  20. Milton, M. (2001). Who helps children who have learning difficulties in numeracy. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom., 6, 6–10.Google Scholar
  21. National Assessment Program – Numeracy and Literacy. (2016). https://www.nap.edu.au/
  22. Nationally Consistent Collection of Data on School Students with Disability. (2015). https://www.education.gov.au/nationally-consistent-collection-data-students-disability-guidelines
  23. Peard, D. (2010). Dyscalculia: What is its prevalence? Research evidence from case studies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(2010), 106–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reeve, R. A., & Gray, S. A. (2015). Number difficulties in young children: Deficits in core number? In S. Chinn (Ed.), The international handbook for mathematical difficulties and dyscalculia (pp. 44–59). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Reeve, R. A., Reynolds, F., Humberstone, J., & Butterworth, B. (2012). Stability and change in markers of Core numerical competencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General., 141, 649–666.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reeve, R. A., & Waldecker, C. (2017). Evidence-based assessment and intervention for dyscalculia and Maths disabilities in school psychology. In M. Thielking & M. D. Terjesen (Eds.), Handbook of Australian school psychology: Integrating international research, practice, and policy (pp. 197–213). Switzerland, Europe: Springer International.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rohl, M., & Greaves, D. (2005). How are pre-service teachers in Australia being prepared for teaching literacy and numeracy to a diverse range of students? Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities., 10, 3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19404150509546780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skues, J. L., & Cunningham, E. G. (2011). A contemporary review of the definition, prevalence, identification and support of learning disabilities in Australian schools. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(2), 159–180.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2011.605154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. South Australia Department of Education and Child Development. (2016). https://www.decd.sa.gov.au/
  30. Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2016). PISA 2015: A first look at. Australia's results. Melbourne, Australia: Australian council for educational research https://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/ Google Scholar
  31. Thomson, S., Wernert, N., O'Grady, E., & Rodrigues. (2016). TIMSS: A first look at Australia's results. http://research.acer.edu.au/timss_2015/
  32. TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS Advanced 2015 International Results. (n.d.). TIMSS International Study Center. Retrieved 15 December 2016.Google Scholar
  33. United Nations Human Development Index. (2013). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/education-index
  34. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2017). Victorian Curriculum: Foundation–10. [electronic version]. Retrieved January 30, 2017 from http://victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/
  35. APA Publication Guide is I have correctly referenced the publication Childhood Development. (2014).Google Scholar
  36. Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2014). Mathematics learning pathways for children birth to five years. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  37. Victorian Department of Education and Training Review of the Program for Students with Disabilities. (2016). http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/department/PSD-Review-Report.pdf
  38. Watson, J., & Bond, T. G. (2007). Walking the walk: Rasch analysis of an exploratory survey of secondary teachers’ attitudes and understanding of students with learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 12, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. White, C. Y., & Elkins, J. (2000). Preservice primary education and the teaching of students with learning difficulties or with disabilities in the areas of literacy and numeracy. In C. E. Van Kraayenoord & J. Elkins (Eds.), Literacy, numeracy and students with disabilities: Teacher Education (pp. 21–50). Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne School of Psychological ScienceUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations