Emerging Affinities: WikiLeaks in the Context of a Legitimation Crisis

  • Stephen M. E. Marmura


Over time, WikiLeaks has adjusted its strategies to take better advantage of a densely populated and globally networked media environment, and the larger reality of an ongoing political legitimation crisis. By directing attention to injustices associated with free trade and the security state, the whistle-blower platform has provided fodder for foreign news operations such as Russia Today, progressive alternative platforms like Democracy Now and The Young Turks and right-wing populist and/or conspiracy-oriented news forums like Breitbart and InfoWars. In the process WikiLeaks has been able to deliver its message of an ostensibly corrupt and broken political/economic order to divergent audiences in a way compatible with its anarchist agenda.


Legitimation crisis Distrust Media fragmentation Strategy Conspiracy theories 


  1. Andrejevic, Mark. 2013. Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assange, Julian. 2006. Conspiracy as Governance. me @ 1–4.
  3. Bacon, David. 2017. NAFTA, The Cross-Border Disaster. The American Prospect, November 7.
  4. Bauman, Zygmunt, and David Lyon. 2013. Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, Daniel. 1976. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bimber, Bruce. 2003. Information and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blattberg, Eric. 2014. The Young Turks Is Running Circles Around News Networks on YouTube. Digiday, October 31.
  8. Calhoun, Craig. 1992. Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere. In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun, 1–50. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, Manuel. 1996. Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2013. Communication Power. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fenster, Mark. 2012. Disclosure’s Effects: WikiLeaks and Transparency. Iowa Law Review 97: 753–807.
  14. Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564–581. Scholar
  15. Habermas, Jurgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1989. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1998. The European Nation-State: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship. Trans. Ciaran Cronin. Public Culture 10: 397–416.
  18. Harding, Luke. 2012. The World Tomorrow: Julian Assange Proves a Useful Idiot. The Guardian, April 17.
  19. ———. 2016. What Are the Panama Papers? A Guide to History’s Biggest Data Leak. The Guardian, April 5.
  20. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Holtz, Colin. 2016. The Panama Papers Prove It: America Can Afford a Universal Basic Income. The Guardian, April 8.
  22. Lasch, Christopher. 1984. The Minimal Self: Psychic Survival in Troubled Times. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, Lisa. 2013. The Leak Heard Round the World? Cablegate in the Evolving Global Mediascape. In Beyond WikiLeaks: Implications of Communications, Journalism and Society, ed. Benedetta Brevini, Arne Hintz, and Patrick McCurdy, 56–77. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marmura, Stephen. 2010. Security Vs Privacy: Media Messages, State Policies, and American Public Trust in Government. In Surveillance, Privacy and the Globalization of Personal Information, ed. Elia Zureik, Lynda Harling Stalker, Emily Smith, David Lyon, and Yolande Chan, 100–126. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Milan, Stefania. 2013. WikiLeaks, Anonymous and the Exercises of Individuality: Protesting in the Cloud. In Beyond WikiLeaks: Implications of Communications, Journalism and Society, ed. Benedetta Brevini, Arne Hintz, and Patrick McCurdy, 85–100. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Naureckas, Jim. 2015. NYT Suggests Sanders Is ‘Unelectable’ for Siding with Majority on Tax Hikes for Rich. FAIR, July 1.
  27. Plant, Raymond. 1982. Jurgen Habermas and the Idea of Legitimation Crisis. European Journal of Political Research 10: 341–352.
  28. Shuster, Simon. 2015. The Global News Network RT is the Russian Government’s Main Weapon in an Intensifying Information War with the West—and Its Top Editor Has a Direct Phone Line to the Kremlin. Time, March 5.
  29. Solove, Daniel. 2007. ‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy. San Diego Law Review 44 (289): 745–772.
  30. Tufekci, Zeynep. 2013. “Not This One”: Social Movements, the Attention Economy, and Microcelebrity Activism. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (7): 848–870.
  31. Ventura, Jesse. 2012. DemoCRIPS and ReBLOODlicans: No More Gangs in Government. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen M. E. Marmura
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologySt. Francis Xavier UniversityAntigonishCanada

Personalised recommendations