Advertisement

Troikanomics pp 173-196 | Cite as

The EU as a Communal Endeavour: Ideal and Reality

  • Ray Kinsella
  • Maurice Kinsella
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we explore the ethic of ‘community’ that is central to sustaining healthy transnational relationships within the EU. This invites an examination into the democratic ideals that underpin the EU—in particular, solidarity and sovereignty. The issue, in this context, is to ask why these are so central, and how they can be discharged in a manner that fosters the national autonomy of individual member states while simultaneously attending to the ongoing stability of the wider community. A key existential crisis that is assailing the EU at present is continued internal dissonance and the threat of further fragmentation. This will put at risk the extraordinary and providential achievements of Schuman, Monnet, Adenauer, and De Gasperi—and threaten a possible Balkanisation of the EU. A reluctance to challenge the prevailing Conventional Wisdom underpinning these developments will, inevitably, lead to continued fracturing. Our proposition is that rediscovering these foundational democratic ideals (with a particular emphasis on solidarity and subsidiarity) is indispensable to the resolution of the deeper existential crisis that the EU is undergoing.

References

  1. Christman, J. (2014a). Coping or Oppression: Autonomy and Adaptation to Circumstance. In A. Veltman & M. Piper (Eds.), Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Christman, J. (2014b). Relational Autonomy and the Social Dynamics of Paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Commission of the European Communities. (1994). White Paper: European Social Policy – A Way Forward for the Union.Google Scholar
  4. de Areilza, J. M. (2009). The History and Foundations of European Integration: A Contribution to the Debate on the Future of the Union. In C. Arvanitopoulos (Ed.), Reforming Europe: The Role of the Centre-Right (pp. 9–21). s.l.: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Benoist, A. (1999). What Is Sovereignty? Telos, 1999(116), 99–118.Google Scholar
  6. European Union, C. o. t. R. o. t. G. o. t. M. S. (2007, December 13). Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community. Volume 2007/C 306/01.Google Scholar
  7. EurWORK European Observatory of Working Life. (2011). Solidarity Principle. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/industrial-relations-dictionary/solidarity-principleGoogle Scholar
  8. Frigot, F., & Bonadonna, E. (2016). Europe and Sovereignty: Reality, Limits and Outlook. s.l.: Robert Schuman Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The Affluent Society. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Gastille, J. (1994). A Definition and Illustration of Democratic Leadership. Human Relations, 47(8), 953–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grabow, K. (Ed.). (2010). Christian Democracy: Principles and Policy Making. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  12. Iglesias, T. (2001). The Dignity of the Individual: Issues of Bioethics and Law. Dublin: Pleroma Press.Google Scholar
  13. Innerarity, D. (2014). Does Europe Need a Demos to Be Truly Democratic? LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series, Volume 77.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. s.l.: s.n.Google Scholar
  15. Kiljunen, K. (2004). The European Constitution in the Making. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Kinsella, M. (2018). Egalitarianism in Therapeutic Dialogue: A Catalyst for Client Autonomy. The Irish Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 18(1), 5–10.Google Scholar
  17. Kinsella, R., & Kinsella, M. (2012, July). The Implosion of Solidarity: A Critique of the Euro Zone Crisis. Working Notes, (69), 22–28.Google Scholar
  18. Mason, A. (2000). Community, Solidarity and Belonging: Levels of Community and Their Normative Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mulcahy, R. E., & Massaro, T. (2003). Subsidiarity. In The New Catholic Encyclopedia (p. 567). United States of America: Gale.Google Scholar
  20. Nobelprize.org. (2012). The Nobel Peace Prize 2012 to the European Union (EU) – Press Release. [Online]. Retrieved May 31, 2018, from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2012/press.html
  21. Panizza, R. (2018). The Principle of Subsidiarity. [Online]. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_1.2.2.pdf
  22. Pimor, A. (2017). Solidarity Was a Founding Principle of European Unity – It Must Remain So. [Online]. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/solidarity-was-a-founding-principle-of-european-unity-it-must-remain-so-74580
  23. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. (2005). Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  24. Pope Benedict XVI. (2009). Caritas in Veritate. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  25. Pope John Paul II. (1991). Centesimus Annus. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  26. Pope John Paul II. (1995). Evangelium Vitae. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  27. Raspotnik, A., Jacob, M., & Ventura, L. (2012). The Issue of Solidarity in the European Union. s.l.: TEPSA.Google Scholar
  28. Schuman, R., & Monnet, J. (1950). The Schuman Declaration. [Online]. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_en
  29. Taylor, C. (1992). The Politics of Recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. The Economist. (2006). The Suez Crisis: An Affair to Remember. [Online]. Retrieved May 19, 2018, from https://www.economist.com/node/7218678
  31. The European Parliament. (2012). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C(326), 391–407.Google Scholar
  32. The Holy See. (1992). Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  33. Van Til, K. A. (2008). Subsidiarity and Sphere-Sovereignty: A Match Made in…? Theological Studies, 69, 610–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wachtel, P. L. (2014). An Integrative Relational View. Psychotherapy, 49(4), 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weiler, J. (1991). The Transformation of Europe. The Yale Law Review, 100(8), 2403–2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weiler, J. (1999). The Constitution of Europe. “Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?” And Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Kinsella
    • 1
  • Maurice Kinsella
    • 2
  1. 1.Michael Smurfit Graduate School of Business (Formerly)Co DublinIreland
  2. 2.The Galilee House of StudiesAthyIreland

Personalised recommendations