Advertisement

Leaving Care Work: Career Prospects in a Secondary Labor Market

  • Miloslav Bahna
  • Martina Sekulová
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the career paths of care workers after leaving care work. The live-in 24-hour personal home care work represents a typical example of a secondary labor market—a low-prestige job with limited career prospects. We find that retirement was the exit strategy for less than a third of the 24-hour personal home care workers. More than half of the care workers found employment after their return to Slovakia. However, well in line with the dual labor market theory, long exposure to care work in Austria is not helpful for career prospects back home. Carers spending five and more years in Austria have a higher risk of working in a less prestigious job than the one they used to have before they left.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (2000). Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. Barbiano di Belgiojoso, E., & Ortensi, L. E. (2018). Satisfied After All? Working Trajectories and Job Satisfaction of Foreign-Born Female Domestic and Care Workers in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1465401
  3. Baron, H. M., & Hymer, B. (1968). The Negro Worker in the Chicago Labor Movement. In J. Jacobson (Ed.), The Negro and the American Labor Movement (pp. 232–285). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Bonacich, E., Light, I. H., & Wong, C. C. (1977, September/October). Koreans in Business. Society, 14, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, C. F. (2016). Insiders and Outsiders: Policy and Care Workers in Taiwan’s Long-Term Care System. Ageing and Society, 36(10), 2090–2116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doeringer, P. B., Geldman, P., Gordon, D. M., Piore, M. J., & Reich, M. (1969). Urban Manpower Programs and Low-Income Labor Markets: A Critical Assessment. Washington, DC: Manpower Administration, Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  7. Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  8. Goździak, E. (2016). Biała emigracja: Variegated Mobility of Polish Care Workers. Social Identities, 22(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1110354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagner, D. (2000). Primary and Secondary Labor Markets: Implications for Vocational Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44(1), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haour-Knipe, M., & Davies, A. (2008). Return Migration of Nurses. Philadelphia, PA: ICNM – International Centre on Nurse Migration.Google Scholar
  11. Hirsch, E. (1980). Dual Labor Market Theory: A Sociological Critique. Sociological Inquiry, 50(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00381.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kniejska, P. (2016). Migrant Care Workers aus Polen in der häuslichen Pflege: Zwischen familiärer Nähe und beruflicher Distanz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurniati, A., Chen, C. M., Efendi, F., & Ogawa, R. (2017). A Deskilling and Challenging Journey: The Lived Experience of Indonesian Nurse Returnees. International Nursing Review, 64(4), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Reilly, J., & Fagan, C. (1998). Conceptualising Part-Time Work. In J. O’Reilly & C. Fagan (Eds.), Part-Time Prospects: An International Comparison of Part-Time Work in Europe, North America and the Pacific Rim (pp. 1–31). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. OECD. (2013). Pensions at a Glance 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/pension_glance-2013-en
  17. Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration, and Domestic Work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Piore, M. J. (1973). The Role of Immigration in Industrial Growth: A Case Study of the Origins and Character of Puerto Rican Migration to Boston. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  19. Piore, M. J. (1980). Comment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 33(3), 312–314.Google Scholar
  20. Ranci, C., & Sabatinelli, S. (2014). Long-Term and Child Care Politics. In M. Leon (Ed.), The Transformation of Care in European Societies (pp. 233–255). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Rogoz, M., & Sekulová, M. (n.d.). The Perceived Impacts of Care Mobility on Sending Countries and Institutional Responses: Healthcare, Long-Term Care and Education in Romania and Slovakia. Vienna.Google Scholar
  22. Taubman, P., & Wachter, M. L. (1986). Chapter 21 Segmented Labor Markets. Handbook of Labor Economics, 2(C), 1183–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(86)02011-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Triandafyllidou, A. (2013). Irregular Migration and Domestic Work in Europe: Who Cares? In A. Triandafyllidou (Ed.), Irregular Migrant Domestic Workers in Europe: Who Cares? (pp. 1–16). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Waddoups, J., & Assane, D. (1997). Duration and Mobility of Young Male Workers in a Segmented Labour Market. Applied Economics Letters, 4(3), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048597355456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watson, I. (2013). Bridges or Traps? Casualisation and Labour Market Transitions in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55, 6–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185612465535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wial, H. (1991). Getting a Good Job: Mobility in a Segmented Labor Market. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 30(3), 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1991.tb00795.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson, K. L., & Portes, A. (1980). Immigrant Enclaves: An Analysis of the Labor Market Experiences of Cubans in Miami. American Journal of Sociology, 86(2), 295. https://doi.org/10.1086/227240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winkelmann, J., Schmidt, A. E., & Leichsenring, K. (2015). Regulating Migrants as a Low-Cost Solution for Long-Term Care: The Formalisation of a Dual Care Labour Market in Austria. In N. Morel & C. Carbonnier (Eds.), The Political Economy of Household Services in Europe (pp. 172–194). London, Gordonsville, and South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137473721_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miloslav Bahna
    • 1
  • Martina Sekulová
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for SociologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations