Advertisement

Crossborder Care in the Long Term: Intersections of Age, Gender, and Circularity

  • Miloslav Bahna
  • Martina Sekulová
Chapter

Abstract

Extensive numbers of Slovak caregivers are compensating for a lack in long-term care capacities in Austria. Circular cross-border commuting is a life strategy for many of them. This chapter focuses on the long-term effects of the migration from Slovakia directed toward 24-hour personal home care for seniors and dependent persons in Austria. The analysis uses research data collected in two fieldwork rounds within a period of seven years. We explore how these care workers’ life projects are impacted by mutual interconnections between gender, age, and temporal circularity. Their personal biographies reflect the diverse ways in which care migration challenges their finances, health, social life, and gender across life-cycle stages.

References

  1. Alwin, D. F. (2012). Integrating Varieties of Life Course Concepts. Journals of Gerontology – Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2001). Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  3. Asis, M. (1995). Family Ties in a World Without Borders. Philippine Sociological Review, 42, 16–26.Google Scholar
  4. Bachinger, A. (2010). 24-Stunden-Betreuung – Gelungenes Legalisierungsprojekt oder prekäre Arbeitsmarktintegration? SWS – Rundschau, 4, 399–412.Google Scholar
  5. Bahna, M. (2014). Slovak Care Workers in Austria: How Important Is the Context of the Sending Country? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2014.902365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, G., & Österle, A. (2016). Mid and Later Life Care Work Migration: Patterns of Re-organising Informal Care Obligations in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Aging Studies, 37, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2016.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boccagni, P. (2017). Aspirations and the Subjective Future of Migration: Comparing Views and Desires of the “Time Ahead” Through the Narratives of Immigrant Domestic Workers. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-016-0047-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosá, M., Bútorová, Z., Filadelfiová, J., Gyárfášová, O., Minarovič, M., Sekulová, M., … Velšic, M. (2009). She and He in Slovakia: Gender and Age in the Period of Transition (Z. Bútorová, Ed.). Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  9. Ciuhu, I. (2018, January 22). “Sindromul Italia”, depresia femeilor plecate la muncă în străinătate. Profesori italieni cercetează experienţa victimelor la Institutul “Socola” de la Iaşi. Adevarul.Google Scholar
  10. Degiuli, F. (2016). Caring for a Living: Migrant Women, Aging Citizens, and Italian Families. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Der Standard. (2018, February 19). Familienbeihilfe: Van der Bellen warnt vor rechtlichen Problemen. Der Standard. Retrieved from https://derstandard.at/2000074574095/Familienbeihilfe-Van-der-Bellen-warnt-vor-rechtlichen-Problemen
  12. Elder, G. H., Johnson Kirkpatrick, M., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the Life Course (p. 728). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Eurostat. (2018). Median Gross Hourly Earnings. Statistics Explained. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  14. Ezzeddine, P. (2012). Mateřství na dálku. Transnacionální mateřství ukrajinských migrantek v České republice. Gender, Rovné Příležitosti, Výzkum, 13(1), 24–32.Google Scholar
  15. Gálisová, L’. (2015). Rodové nerovnosti v odmeňovaní a dôchodkoch v Slovenskej republike. Bratislava: Fórum pre pomoc starším.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia, A. B., & Gruat, J. V. (2003). Social Protection: A Life Cycle Continuum Investment for Social Justice, Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  17. Gendera, S. (2011). Gaining an Insight into Central European Transnational Care Spaces: Migrant Live-In Care Workers in Austria. In G. Bommes & S. Michael (Eds.), Foggy Social Structures: Irregular Migration, European Labour Markets and the Welfare State (p. 229). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gonzáles-Ferrer, A. (2007). The Process of Family Reunification Among Original Guest-Workers in Germany. Zeitschrift Für Familienforschung, 19(1), 10–33.Google Scholar
  19. Goździak, E. (2016). Biała emigracja: Variegated Mobility of Polish Care Workers. Social Identities, 22(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1110354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001). Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (1997). “I’m Here, but I’m There”: The Meanings of Latina Transnational Motherhood. Gender & Society, 11(5), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520225619.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kontos, M., & Bonifacio, G. L. A. T. (Eds.). (2015). Migrant Domestic Workers and Family Life: International Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Kuchyňková, A., & Ezzeddine, P. (2015). ‘Ještě nepatřím do starého železa’ aneb paradoxy migrace péče z ČR do Rakouska. Gender, Rovné Příležitosti, Výzkum, 16(2), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumagai, N. (2017). Distinct Impacts of High Intensity Caregiving on Caregivers’ Mental Health and Continuation of Caregiving. Health Economics Review, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-017-0151-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lutz, H. (2007). The ‘Intimate Others’: Migrant Domestic Workers in Europe. In E. Berggren et al. (Eds.), Irregular Migration, Informal Labour and Community: A Challenge for Europe. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Lutz, H. (2011). The New Maids: Transnational Women and the Care Economy. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  27. Michalitsch, G. (2010). Trh a moc. Ekonomické (re)produkovanie rodovej nerovnosti. In J. Cviková (Ed.), Rodová perspektíva v ekonómii (p. 158). Aspekt: Záujmové združenie žien ASPEKT.Google Scholar
  28. Morokvasic, M. (2004). “Settled in Mobility”: Engendering Post-Wall Migration in Europe. Feminist Review, 77(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morokvasic, M. (2013). Transnational Mobilities and Gender in Europe. Ars & Humanitas, 7(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.4312/ah.7.2.45-59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morokvašić, M. (2014). Gendering Migration. Migracijske i Etničke Teme, 30(3), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.11567/met.30.3.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MPSVR. (2017). Pomoc pre slovenské opatrovatel’ky v Rakúsku. Bratislava: Ministerstvo práce, sociálnych vecí a rodiny SR. Retrieved April 18, 2018, from https://www.employment.gov.sk/sk/informacie-media/aktuality/pomoc-slovenske-opatrovatelky-rakusku.html
  32. Österle, A., & Bauer, G. (2016). The Legalization of Rotational 24-Hour Care Work in Austria: Implications for Migrant Care Workers. Social Politics, 23(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pacherová, S. (2017, July 11). Rezort práce chce regulovať firmy sprostredkujuce pracu opatrovateliek. Denník Pravda. Retrieved from https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/435065-rezort-prace-chce-regulovat-firmy-sprostredkujuce-pracu-opatrovateliek/
  34. Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Mothering from a Distance: Emotions, Gender, and Intergenerational Relations in Filipino Transnational Families. Feminist Studies, 27(2), 361–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parreñas, R. (2005). Long Distance Intimacy: Gender and Intergenerational Relations in Transnational Families. Global Networks, 5(4), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00122.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parreñas, R. S. (2015). Servants of Globalization: Migration and Domestic Work (2nd ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Radvanský, M., & Lichner, I. (2013). Impact of Ageing on Long-Term Care Demand and Supply in Slovakia. Bratislava: Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  38. Rogoz, M., & Sekulová, M. (2018). The Perceived Impacts of Care Mobility on Sending Countries and Institutional Responses: Healthcare, Long-Term Care and Education in Romania and Slovakia. Manuscript Submitted for Publication. Vienna: International Centre for Migration Policy Development.Google Scholar
  39. Schulz, R., & Sherwood, P. (2008). Physical and Mental Health Effects of Family Caregiving. The American Journal of Nursing, 108(9), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000336406.45248.4cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sekulová, M. (2013a). Migrantky a Sféra Domácej Práce. Opatrovatel’ky v Rakúsku v Transnacionálnej Perspektíve. Bratislava: Comenius University Bratislava.Google Scholar
  41. Sekulová, M. (2013b). Transnational Households in the Context of Female Migration from Slovakia to Austria. Urban People, 15(2), 217–236.Google Scholar
  42. Solari, C. (2010). Resource Drain vs. Constitutive Circularity: Comparing the Gendered Effects of Post-Soviet Migration Patterns in Ukraine. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 28(1), 215–238.Google Scholar
  43. Tolstokorova, A. (2009). Who Cares for Carers? Feminization of Labor Migration from Ukraine and Its Impact on Social Welfare. International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, 18(1), 62–84.Google Scholar
  44. Tolstokorova, A. (2010). Where Have All the Mothers Gone? The Gendered Effect of Labour Migration and Transnationalism on the Institution of Parenthood in Ukraine. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 28(1), 184–214.Google Scholar
  45. Tolstokorova, A. (2012). The Woman and Sixpence: Gendered Impact of Remittances on Social Sustainability of Ukrainian Transnational Households. Analytical Journal, 5(1), 74–97.Google Scholar
  46. Triandafyllidou, A. (Ed.). (2013). Circular Migration Between Europe and Its Neighbourhood Choice or Necessity? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Uhde, Z. (2012). Slepá ulička instituce nájemní domácí péče. Gender, Rovné Příležitosti, Výzkum, 13(1), 12–23.Google Scholar
  48. Verd, J. M., & López, M. (2011). The Rewards of a Qualitative Approach to Life-Course Research. The Example of the Effects of Social Protection Policies on Career Paths. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 15. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1753/3259
  49. Winkelmann, J., Schmidt, A. E., & Leichsenring, K. (2015). Regulating Migrants as a Low-Cost Solution for Long-Term Care: The Formalisation of a Dual Care Labour Market in Austria. In C. Carbonnier & N. Morel (Eds.), The Political Economy of Household Services in Europe (p. 288). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. WKO. (2018). Statistical Data on Self-Employed Persons in Personal Home Care in Austria 2013–2017. Vienna: Wirtschaftskammer Ӧsterreich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miloslav Bahna
    • 1
  • Martina Sekulová
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for SociologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations