Advertisement

The Digital Classroom: A Historical Consideration on the Redesigning of the Contexts of Learning

  • Inés Dussel
Chapter
Part of the Educational Governance Research book series (EGTU, volume 9)

Abstract

In the digital age, it is increasingly common that classrooms show a significant presence of technological devices that redesign their layout and daily interactions. However, this redesigning is less the result of the direct intervention of designers and architects than the effect of local and usually more silent arrangements that find ways to accommodate the demands of these devices in the existing physical and pedagogical environments. In the chapter, I present some of the current debates on transforming schools into ‘smart and sentient’ environments for learning and the new role of digital devices in them. Based on research done in Argentinean and Mexican classrooms, I then argue that there is a visible trend in their interactions and material layout that shows a shift from several artifacts and pedagogical devices (window, blackboard, fieldtrips, and playgrounds) that used to invite different trajectories for learning to an overwhelming presence of a single artifact that appears to synthetize all these possibilities: the screen. In the final section, I reflect on the direction of this shift and on the orientations that new design and pedagogies could take. I claim that studying the redesigning of classrooms in digitalized schools gives us access to ‘a history of our contemporary infrastructures of sense and knowledge’, in Orit Halpern’s terms, a history that is perhaps unsettling but that, precisely for that reason, needs to be interrogated.

Keywords

Digital classrooms Design Screen Window Blackboard 

References

  1. Barnard, H. (1854). School architecture, or contributions to the improvement of schoolhouses in the United States. New York: Charles B. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, W. (1968). Theses on the philosophy of History. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 253–264). New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades project (H. Eiland & K. McLaughlin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, C. (2005). Light: Metaphor and materiality in the history of schooling. In M. Lawn & I. Grosvenor (Eds.), Materialities of schooling. Design, technology, objects, routines (pp. 125–141). Oxford.: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, C. (2013a). The decorated school: Cross-disciplinary research in the history of art as integral to the design of educational environments. Paedagogica Historica, 49(6), 813–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, C. (2013b). A life in education and architecture. Mary Beaumont Medd. Surrey: Ashgate Publ. Ltd..Google Scholar
  7. Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2008). School. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  8. Burkhalter, G. (2016). The playground project. In X. Salle and others (Eds.), The playground project (pp. 10–48). Zurich: JRP Ringier Kunstverlag AG.Google Scholar
  9. Chateau, D., & Mouré, J. (Eds.). (2016). Screens. From materiality to spectatorship – A historical and theoretical reassessment. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  10. da Barra, V. M. L. (2016). Da pedra ao pó. O itinerário da lousa na escolar pública paulista do século XIX [From stone to dust: The itinerary of the blackboard in Sao Paulo’s public schools in the 19th century]. Goiânia: Gráfica UFG.Google Scholar
  11. Darian-Smith, K., & Willis, J. (Eds.). (2017). Designing schools. Space, place, and pedagogy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30, 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. di Robilant, M., Maak, N., Koolhaas, R., & Boom, I. (2015). Window. Venezia: Marsilio.Google Scholar
  14. Dussel, I. & Caruso, M. (2000). La invención del aula. Una genealogía de las formas de enseñar [The invention of the classroom. A genealogy of the ways of teaching]. Buenos Aires: Santillana.Google Scholar
  15. Feldman, D. (2010). Enseñanza y escuela [Teaching and school]. Buenos Aires: Aique.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, K., & Newton, C. (2014). Transforming the twenty-first-century campus to enhance the net-generation student learning experience: Using evidence-based design to determine what works and why in virtual/physical teaching spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 903–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flusser, V. (1999a). The designer’s way of seeing. In Flusser (Ed.), The shape of things. A philosophy of design (A. Matthews, Trans., pp. 39–42). London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  18. Flusser, V. (1999b). The factory. In The shape of things. A philosophy of design (A. Matthews, Trans., pp. 43–50). London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  20. Friedberg, A. (2006). The virtual window. From Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Halpern, O. (2014). Beautiful data. A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hanke, M. (2014). Vilem Flusser’s philosophy of design: Sketching the outlines and mapping the sources. Flusser Studies, 21, 1–21.Google Scholar
  23. Hébrard, J. (1995). La leçon et l’exercice. Quelques réflexions sur l’histoire des pratiques de scolarisation. In A. Bentolila (Ed.), Savoirs et savoir-faire. Les entretiens Nathan -Actes V (pp. 155–162). Paris: Éditions Nathan.Google Scholar
  24. Hunter, I. (1988). Culture and government: The emergence of literary education. Hampshire/London: The MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenkins, H. (2007). The wow climax: Tracing the emotional impact of popular culture. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Latour, B. (2005). From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik. Or how to make things public. In B. Latour, & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public. Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 14–43). Karlsruhe/Cambridge, MA: ZKM/Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Le Coeur, M. (2011). La chaire et les gradins. De la salle de classe a la salle de cours dans les lycées au XIXe siècle. Histoire de l’Éducation, 130, 85–109.Google Scholar
  28. Lippman, P. C. (2002). “Practice theory, pedagogy, and the design of learning environments,” CAE Net. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Committee of Architecture for Education, 2. Available at: http://network.aia.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=c6d686b8-1265-4904-b45d-437769e426f0&forceDialog=0. Last accessed on 13 Nov 2015.
  29. Logan, C. (2017). Open shut them: Open classrooms in Australian schools, 1967–1983. In K. Darian-Smith & J. Willis (Eds.), Designing schools. Space, place, and pedagogy (pp. 83–95). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lungstrum, J. W. (1999). The display window: Designs and desires of weimar consumerism. New German Critique, (76), 115–160.Google Scholar
  31. Masschelein, J. (2014). Making the school: Stories of caves and tables. In W. Lambrecht, & N. Vansieleghem (Eds.), Old school/Nieuwe Klas (43–53). Ghent: LUCA School for the Arts.Google Scholar
  32. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defence of the school. A public issue (J. McMartin, Trans.). Leuven: Education, Culture and Society Publishers KU Leuven.Google Scholar
  33. McGuirk, J. (2014). Radical cities: Across Latin America in search of a new architecture. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  34. Nespor, J. (2000). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Rudd, T., Gifford, C., Morrison, J., & Facer, K. (2006). What if …? Reimagining learning spaces. Bristol: Futurelab.Google Scholar
  36. Sarmiento, D. F. (2001). “La pizarra (El Monitor, 15 de enero de 1853),” [The blackboard]. In Obras Completas. Tomo XXVIII. Ideas pedagógicas [Complete works. Vol 28: Pedagogical ideas]. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universidad de la Matanza.Google Scholar
  37. Sobe, N. W. (2006). Embodied knowledge and the nation: The school field trip. In I. Epstein (Ed.), Recapturing the personal: Education. Embodied knowledge and comparative inquiry (pp. 143–162). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Tondeur, J., & others. (2015). The physical placement of classroom technology and its influences on educational practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 537–556.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.998624.
  39. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. van den Driessche, M. (2009). Architecture of the educational complex in the Belgian context. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University Ghent.Google Scholar
  41. van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willis, J. (2017). Architecture and the school in the twentieth century. In K. Darian-Smith & J. Willis (Eds.), Designing schools. Space, place, and pedagogy (pp. 1–8). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Yates, L. (2012). My School, My University, My Country, My World, My Google, Myself… What is education for now? Australian Educational Researcher, 39, 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inés Dussel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchCINVESTAVMexico cityMexico

Personalised recommendations