Advertisement

Green Infrastructure Planning to Tackle Climate Change in Latin American Cities

  • Alexis VásquezEmail author
  • Emanuel Giannotti
  • Elizabeth Galdámez
  • Paola Velásquez
  • Carolina Devoto
Chapter

Abstract

Green infrastructure (GI) offers a new perspective on the benefits of urban and peri-urban green spaces. In Latin America, the urbanization process has involved a loss of these green spaces of high environmental value. These changes have had a series of consequences on the climate of Latin American cities that have been intensified by climate change. Although the contribution of GI to urban climate regulation and to climate change mitigation and adaptation is growing in recognition, the debate has still had little influence on urban planning initiatives, with exceptions in North America and Europe. In Latin America and Africa little is known about how climate change adaptation plans incorporate the development of urban GI. This chapter explores institutional actions to develop GI as an alternative to tackle climate change in Latin American cities. A bibliographic review was conducted using the terms “green infrastructure” or “climate change.” The analysis focused on identifying: responsible institutions, objectives, and the understanding and use of the GI concept. Results indicate that GI has been recently and slowly incorporated into urban planning. This scenario suggests a growing awareness of the need to plan sustainable, green, and more prepared cities to face climate change. However, planners have not considered enough the potential contribution of GI; thus, the role of GI has not been properly identified and valued in urban planning, and planning and design efforts do not maximize the benefits of GI.

Keywords

Green infrastructure Ecosystem services Urban planning Climate change adaptation and mitigation 

References

  1. Ahern, J. (2007). Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension. In V. Novotny & P. Brown (Eds.), Cities for the future towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management (pp. 265–283). London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Alphandéry, P., & Fortier, A. (2012). La trame verte et bleue et ses réseaux: science, acteurs et territoires. VertigO La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 12, 1–15.Google Scholar
  3. Andrade, G. I., Remolina, F., & Wiesner, D. (2013). Assembling the pieces: a framework for the integration of multi-functional ecological main structure in the emerging urban region of Bogotá, Colombia. Urban ecosystems, 16, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AQUAFONDO (2016). SEDAPAL y AQUAFONDO firman alianza para la recuperación ecológica de ríos Rímac, Chillón y Lurín. Accessed 26 June 2016, from http://aquafondo.org.pe/sedapal-y-aquafondo-buscan-recuperacion-ecologica-de-rios-rimac-chillon-y-lurin/
  5. Ayuntamiento de Barcelona. (2013). Barcelona green infrastructure and biodiversity plan 2020. Accessed 4 July 2016, from http://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/sites/default/files/Barcelona%20green%20infrastructure%20and%20biodiversity%20plan%202020.pdf.
  6. Ayuntamiento de Barcelona. (2014). Barcelona, ciutat resilient al canvi climatic. Accessed 4 July 2016, from http://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/sites/default/files/BCN_resilient_def.pdf
  7. Baró, F., Chaparro, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Langemeyer, J., Nowak, D. J., & Terradas, J. (2014). Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: The case of urban forests in Barcelona Spain. Ambio, 43, 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baró, F., Haase, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Mismatches between ecosystems services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecological Indicators, 55, 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baró, F., Palomo, I., Zulian, G., Vizcaino, P., Haase, D., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2016). Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 57, 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benedict, M. A., & McMahon, E. T. (2006). Green infrastructure: Linking landscapes and communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bertrand, F., & Simonet, G. (2012). Les trames vertes urbaines et l’adaptation au changement climatique: perspectives pour l’aménagement du territoire. VertigO La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement.  https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.11869.
  12. Camp-Calvet, M., Langemeyer, J., Calvet-Mir, L., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2016). Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cariola, C., & Lacabana, M. (2003). Globalización y desigualdades socioterritoriales: la expansión de la periferia metropolitana de Caracas. Eure, 29, 5–21.Google Scholar
  14. Carrillo, M. (2011). La dinámica de crecimiento del borde urbano sobre los Cerros Orientales de Bogotá. Posibilidades de gestión en zonas de ladera. Proyecto para optar al título de profesional en Gestión y Desarrollo Urbanos. Bogotá: Facultad de Ciencia Política y Gobierno/Universidad Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario.Google Scholar
  15. Carrión, F., & Dammert, M. (2016). Los estudios urbanos en América Latina: un espejo donde mirarse. In P. Metzger, J. Rebotier, J. Robert, P. Urquieta, & P. Vega (Eds.), La cuestión urbana en la región andina: miradas sobre la investigación y la formación (pp. 241–280). Quito: Babel.Google Scholar
  16. Carter, J. G., Cavan, G., Connelly, A., Guy, S., Handley, J., & Kazmierczak, A. (2015). Climate change and the city: Building capacity for urban adaptation. Progress in Planning, 95, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CIDES-UMSA. (2011). Ciudades en transformación: Disputas por el espacio, apropiación de la ciudad y prácticas de ciudadanía. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
  18. City of Mexico. (2014). Programa de Acción Climática Ciudad de México 2014–2020. Accessed 24 June 2016, from http://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/164914/PACCM-2014-2020completo.pdf
  19. Climate Change Department, Division of Natural Resources and Biodiversity at the Ministry of Environment. (2014). Climate change adaptation plan for biodiversity. Santiago: Andros Impresores.Google Scholar
  20. Committee on Pathways to Urban Sustainability. (2016). Pathways to urban sustainability. challenges and opportunities for The United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Consalès, J. N., Goiffon, M., & Barthélémy, C. (2012). Entre aménagement du paysage et ménagement de la nature à Marseille: la trame verte à l’épreuve du local. Développement durable et territoires. Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
  22. Cormier, L., De Lajartre, A., & Carcaud, N. (2010). La planification des trames vertes, du global au local: réalités et limites. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography.  https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.23187.
  23. Davies, C., Hansen, R., Rall, E., Pauleit, S., Lafortezza, R., De Bellis, Y., Santos, A., & Tosics, I. (2015). Green infrastructure planning and implementation. The status of European green space planning and implementation based on an analysis of selected European city-regions. GREEN SURGE Deliverable 5.1, Unversity of Aachen.Google Scholar
  24. Delgado, G., Campos, C., & Rentería, P. (2012). Cambio climático y el metabolismo urbano de las Megaurbes Latinoamericanas. Habitat Sustentable, 2(1), 2–25.Google Scholar
  25. Doswald, N., & Osti, M. (2011). Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation and mitigation: Good practice examples and lessons learned in Europe. Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz/Federal Agency for Nature Conservation.Google Scholar
  26. Economides, C. (2014). Green Infrastructure: Sustainable Solutions in 11 Cities across the United States. Columbia: Columbia University Water Center.Google Scholar
  27. Environment Secretariat. (2016a). Programas y proyectos: Bogotá Construcción Sostenible. Accessed 15 Aug 2016, from http://ambientebogota.gov.co/gestion-ambiental-constructoras.
  28. Environment Secretariat. (2016b). Programas y proyectos: Bogotá Construcción Sostenible Documento Técnico de Soporte. Accessed 20 June 2016, from http://www.ambientebogota.gov.co/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=9d44366f-8dbd-47bc-bdfd-60a55bd364af&groupId=3564131
  29. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Green infrastructure case studies: Municipal policies for managing stormwater with green infrastructure. Accessed 15 Dec 2016, from https://goo.gl/KAn1Of
  30. European Parliament. (2015). U.S. climate change policy. Accessed 18 Jan 2017, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536321/IPOL_IDA(2015)536321_EN.pdf
  31. Fontanari, E., Marpillero, S., & Pollak, L. (2014). Changing New York City 2002–13. Design as competitive advantage. Lotus International, 153, 98–103.Google Scholar
  32. Generalitat de Catalunya. (2012a). Pla de l’Energia i Canvi Climàtic de Catalunya 2012–2020. Accessed 13 July 2016, from http://canviclimatic.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/actualitat/docs/pecac_informacio_publica.pdf
  33. Generalitat de Catalunya. (2012b). Estrategia catalana de adaptación al cambio climático 2013–2020. Accessed 12 July 2016, from http://canviclimatic.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/campanyes_i_comunicacio/publicacions/els_papers_de_l_occc/resum_executiu_escacc.doc_es.pdf
  34. Gill, S. (2009). Planning for green infrastructure: Adapting to climate change. In S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, & A. Mehmood (Eds.), Planning for Climate Change. Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners. London/Sterling: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Gill, S. E., Handley, J. F., Ennos, A. R., & Pauleit, S. (2007). Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment, 33, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Government of the City of Buenos Aires. (2010). Buenos Aires action plan 2030. Buenos Aires: Government of the City of Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  37. Hamin, E. M., & Gurran, N. (2009). Urban form and climate change: Balancing adaptation and mitigation in the US and Australia. Habitat International, 33(3), 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hansen, R., & Pauleit, S. (2014). From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio, 43, 516–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hansen, R., Rall, E. L., & Pauleit, S. (2014). A transatlantic lens on green infrastructure planning and ecosystem services. Assessing implementation in Berlin and Seattle. In T. Hauck, D. Czechowski, & G. Hausladen (Eds.), Revising green infrastructure: Concepts between nature and design (pp. 247–265). London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hardoy, J., Hernández, I., Pacheco, J. A., & Sierra, G. (2014). Institutionalizing climate change adaptation at municipal and state level in Chetumal and Quintana Roo, Mexico. Environment and Urbanization, 26, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hellmund, P., & Smith, D. (2006). Designing greenways: Sustainable landscapes for nature and people. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hough, M. (1995). Cities and natural process. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. (2007). The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kazmierczak, A., & Carter, J. (2010). Adaptation to climate change using green and blue infrastructure, A database of case studies. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  46. Keeley, M., Koburger, A., Dolowitz, D. P., Medearis, D., Nickel, D., & Shuster, W. (2013). Perspectives on the use of green infrastructure for stormwater management in Cleveland and Milwaukee. Environmental Management, 51, 1093–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (Eds.). (2009). Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Kremer, P., Hamstead, Z. A., & McPhearson, T. (2016). The value of urban ecosystem services in New York City: A spatially explicit multicriteria analysis of landscape scale valuation scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lafortezza, R., Davies, C., Sanesi, G., & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2013). Green infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lennon, M. (2014). Green infrastructure and planning policy: A critical assessment. Local Environment, 20, 957–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Magrin, G. (2015). Adaptación al cambio climático en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: Naciones Unidas.Google Scholar
  52. Marchal, J. Y., & Palma, R. (1985). Análisis gráfico de un espacio regional: Veracruz. Xalapa: INIREB-ORSTOM.Google Scholar
  53. Matthews, T., Lo, A., & Byrne, J. (2015). Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mazza, L., Bennett, G., De Nocker, L., Gantioler, S., Losarcos, L., Margerison, C., & Tucker, G. (2011). Green infrastructure implementation and efficiency. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy.Google Scholar
  55. McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  56. McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 152–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mehdi, L., Weber, C., Di Pietro, F., & Selmi, W. (2012). Évolution de la place du végétal dans la ville, de l’espace vert a la trame verte. VertigO La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 12, 1–16.Google Scholar
  58. Mell, I. C. (2010). Green infrastructure: concepts, perceptions and its use in spatial planning. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
  59. Mell, I. C. (2014). Aligning fragmented planning structures through a green infrastructure approach to urban development in the UK and USA. Forestry & Urban Greening, 13, 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mell, I. C. (2016). Global green infrastructure: Lessons for successful policy-making, investment and management. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mesa, N., & de Rosa, C. (2005). Estudio de los patrones de apropiación del suelo urbano por la expansión de las áreas residenciales: Análisis del Área Metropolitana de Mendoza. Avances en Energías Renovables y Medio Ambiente, 9, 591–596.Google Scholar
  62. Metropolitan Municipality of Lima. (2015). Estrategia de adaptación y acciones de mitigación de la provincia de Lima al cambio climático. Accessed 13 June 2016, from https://pruebafuerzasocial.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/estrategia-de-adaptacic3b3n-y-mitigacic3b3n-de-la-provincia-de-lima-al-cambio-climc3a1tico.pdf
  63. Mollá, M. (2006). El crecimiento de los asentamientos irregulares en áreas protegidas: La delegación Tlalpan. Investigaciones geográficas, 1, 83–109.Google Scholar
  64. Municipal Committee on Climate Change, Working Groups for Transportation, Energy, Construction, Land Use, Solid Waste and Health. (2011). Diretrizes para o Plano de Ação da Cidade de São Paulo para Mitigação e Adaptação às Mudanças Climáticas. Accessed in 14 June 2016, from https://goo.gl/spHZLx
  65. National Climate Assessment. (2014). Report. Accessed 15 June 2016, from http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/downloads.
  66. Naumann, S., Anzaldua, G., Gerdes, H., Frelih-Larsen, A., McKenna, D., Berry, P., Burch, S., & Sanders, M. (2011). Assessment of the potential of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation in Europe. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment.Google Scholar
  67. NYC Environmental Agency. (2010). NYC Green infrastructure plan. A sustainable strategy for clean waterways. Accessed 13 July 2016, from http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/pdf/green_infrastructure/NYCGreenInfrastructurePlan_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
  68. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Progress report on approaches to mobilizing institutional investment for green infrastructure. Accessed in 18 Nov 2016, from https://goo.gl/HPfbZr
  69. Planning Policy Statement 12. PPS12. (2008). Planning shapes the places where people live and work and the country we live in. It plays a key role in supporting the Government’s wider social, environmental and economic objectives and for sustainable communities. Accessed 10 Oct2016, from http://www.communityplanning.net/pub-film/pdf/PlanningPolicyStatement12.pdf
  70. Prefecture of Rio de Janeiro. (2013a). Plano Diretor da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Accessed 12 Nov 2016, from http://www.rio.rj.gov.br/web/smu/plano-diretor1
  71. Prefecture of Rio de Janeiro. (2013b). Inventário das emissões de gases de efeito estufa da cidade do Rio de Janeiro em 2012. E Atualização do plano de ação municipal para redução das emissõe. Accessed 20 Jan 2016, from http://www.rio.rj.gov.br/documents/91265/0/CRJ_InventarioGEE-2012_resumo_tecnico+-+PORTUGUES+-+FINAL.pdf.
  72. Prefecture of Rio de Janeiro. (2015). Plano Diretor de arborização urbana da cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Accessed 15 Jan 2016, from http://www.rio.rj.gov.br/dlstatic/10112/5560381/4146113/PDAUtotal5.pdf.
  73. Rankovic, A., Pacteau, C., & Abbadie, L. (2012). Services écosystémiques et adaptation urbaine interscalaire au changement climatique: un essai d’articulation. VertigO La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.11851
  74. Republic of Colombia. (2016). Plan Nacional de Adaptación al Cambio Climático. Accessed 15 Apr 2016, from https://goo.gl/FufvKV
  75. Roebelling, P., Saraiva, M., Palla, A., Gnecco, I., Teotónio, C., Fidelis, T., & Rocha, J. (2017). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of green/blue space, urban residential and road infrastructure projects in the Confluence (Lyon): A hedonic pricing simulation approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60, 482–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Romero, L. (2007). Are we missing the point? Particularities of urbanization, sustainability and carbon emissions in Latin American cities. Environment and Urbanization, 19, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Romero, H., & Sarricolea, P. (2006, September 18–21). Patrones y factores de crecimiento espacial de la ciudad de Santiago de Chile y sus efectos en la generación de islas de calor urbanas de superficie. Paper presented at Towards Clima, Sociedad y Medio Ambiente: V Congreso de la Asociación Española de Climatología, Zaragoza, España.Google Scholar
  78. Rouse, D. C., & Bunster-Ossa, I. F. (2013). Green infrastructure: A landscape approach. Chicago: American Planning Association.Google Scholar
  79. SEDAPAL. (2016). SEDAPAL y AQUAFONDO buscan recuperación ecológica de ríos Rímac, Chillón y Lurín. Accessed 17 Aug 2016, from https://goo.gl/lrqu5t
  80. Seto, K., Parnel, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2013). A global outlook on urbanization. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. Marcotullio, R. McDonald, S. Parnell, M. Schewenius, M. Sendstad, K. Seto, & C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  81. Sosa-Rodriguez, F. S. (2014). From federal to city mitigation and adaptation: Climate change policy in Mexico City. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19, 969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. SUNASS. (2016). SUNASS: invertir en infraestructura verde permitirá conservar el agua y la biodiversidad. Accessed 12 Oct 2016, from http://www.sunass.gob.pe/websunassi/index.php/es/noticias/item/406-sunass-invertir-en-infraestructura-verde-permitira-conservar-el-agua-y-la-biodiversidad
  83. Székely, A. (2009). Latinoamérica y la biodiversidad. Accessed 29 Sept 2016, from https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/6/2673/18.pdf
  84. The City of New York. (2011). A greener, greater New York. Accessed 25 Dec 2016, from http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc/downloads/pdf/publications/planyc_2011_planyc_full_report.pdf
  85. The City of New York. (2013). A stronger, more resilient New York. Accessed 13 Oct 2016, from https://riskcenter.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/2013-StrongerNewYork.pdf
  86. The City of New York. (2015). One New York. The Plan for a strong and Just City. Accessed 29 Nov 2016, from http://www.nyc.gov/html/onenyc/downloads/pdf/publications/OneNYC.pdf
  87. Toublanc, M., & Bonin, S. (2012). Planifier les trames vertes dans les aires urbaines: une alliance à trouver entre paysagisme et écologie. Développement durable et territoires. Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
  88. United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects. New York: Highlights.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vásquez, A. (2016). Infraestructura verde, servicios ecosistémicos y sus aportes para enfrentar el cambio climático en ciudades: El caso del corredor ribereño del río Mapocho en Santiago de Chile. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 63, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vásquez, A., Lukas, M., Salgado, M., & Mayorga, J. (2017). Urban environmental (in)justice in Latin America: The case of Chile. In G. Walker & R. Holifield (Eds.), Handbook of environmental justice (pp. 556–566). London: Taylor & Francis Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ville de Lyon. (2013). Plan climat-énergie territorial de la ville. Plan d’Actions à l’horizon 2020 – la collectivité s’engage. Accessed 3 July 2016, from https://goo.gl/erQTSg
  92. Water Fund. (2015). AQUAFONDO Lima Perú. Accessed 25 July 2016, from http://www.fondosdeagua.org/sites/default/files/fact_sheet_lima_final_baja.pdf.
  93. Water Fund. (2017). Lima busca conservar sus fuentes de agua. Accessed 15 July 2016, from http://www.fondosdeagua.org/es/lima-busca-conservar-sus-fuentes-de-agua
  94. Yalçın, M., & Lefèvre, B. (2012). Local climate action plans in France: Emergence, limitations and conditions for success. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zahmatkesh, Z., Burian, S. J., Karamouz, M., Tavakol-Davani, H., & Goharian, E. (2014). Low-impact development practices to mitigate climate change effects on urban stormwater runoff: Case study of New York City. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 141, 04014043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Young, R., Zanders, J., Lieberknecht, K., & Fassman-Beck, E. (2014). A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2571–2583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexis Vásquez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emanuel Giannotti
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Galdámez
    • 1
  • Paola Velásquez
    • 2
  • Carolina Devoto
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de GeografíaUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Departamento de UrbanismoUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Departamento of ArquitecturaUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations