Advertisement

Processing Baseline: The Easy Poem

  • Davide Castiglione
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is the first of three analytical chapters, focusing on the lack of difficulty. Strand’s ‘The Late Hour’ and Betjeman’s ‘Loneliness’ are virtually devoid of LIDs. By contrast, they feature aids to comprehension, processing and interpretation in the dimensions of accessibility, readability and interpretability, respectively. Shared schema, immersive techniques and concrete settings enhance accessibility; syntax/line match, narrativity, repetition and stanzaic structure enhance readability; interpretability is ensured by an appeal to intrinsically meaningful themes. Although less explicit than business letters or recipes, easy poems draw on a ‘ready-made’ literary meaning which can be retrieved top-down. High intersubjective topic agreement, elaborations on emotions, high reading speed and a tendency to paraphrase the text are the most notable RIDs elicited by this aesthetic typology.

Bibliography

  1. Adamson, S. (1999). The Literary Language. In S. Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, 4, 1776–The Present Day (pp. 589–692). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, M. C. (2012). Anti-Romanticism in Mark Strand’s Dark Harbour XXXIV. The Explicator, 70(3), 209–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castiglione, D. (2017). Difficult Poetry Processing: Reading Times and the Narrativity Hypothesis. Language and Literature, 26(2), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 Million Words, 1990–Present. Available at https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
  6. Emmott, C., Sanford, A. J., & Morrow, L. I. (2006). Capturing the Attention of Readers? Stylistic and Psychological Perspectives on the Use and Effect of Text Fragmentation in Narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics, 35, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fabb, N. (2014). The Verse-Line as a Whole Unit in Working Memory, Ease of Processing, and the Aesthetic Effects of Form. Philosophy Supplement Volume, 75, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner, K. J. (2004). Anglicanism and the Poetry of John Betjeman. Christianity and Literature, 53(4), 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gavins, J. (2007). Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green, K. (2015). Deixis in Literature. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics (pp. 400–415). London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  11. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  13. Hidalgo-Downing, L. (2000). Negation, Text Worlds, and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  14. Hühn, P., Goerke, B., Plooy, H., & Schenk-Haupt, S. (2016). Facing Loss and Death: Narrative and Eventfulness in Lyric Poetry. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jagt, R. K., Hoeks, J. C. J., Dorleijn, G., & Hendriks, P. (2014). Look Before You Leap. How Enjambment Affects the Processing of Poetry. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  18. Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007 [1981]). Style in Fiction. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Mahlberg, M., Conklin, K., & Bisson, M. (2014). Reading Dickens’s Characters: Employing Psycholinguistic Methods to Investigate the Psychological Reality of Patterns in Text. Language and Literature, 23(4), 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sklar, H. (2013). The Art of Sympathy in Fiction: Forms of Ethical and Emotional Persuasion. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strand, M. (1978). The Late Hour. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  23. Testa, E. (1997). Lo stile semplice. Discorso e romanzo. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  24. Toolan, M. (2001 [1988]). Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, G. (1974). The Lyric Present: Simple Present Verbs in English Poems. PMLA, 89(3), 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yaron, I. (2002). Processing of Obscure Poetic Texts: Mechanisms of Selection. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31(2), 133–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Castiglione
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of English PhilologyVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations